Controlling dynamical behavior of drive-response system through linear augmentation

Abstract Unidirectionally coupled chaotic systems give rise to driver induced bistability in response system under certain parameters setting. Such a system is studied here with augmented dynamics. A linear augmentation provides a controlled dynamical behavior of response system in two different ways: augmented drive system brings the stabilization of the steady state where as augmented response system is able to control the bistability. We present a detailed analysis of Lorenz–Rössler system with linear augmentation for controlled dynamical behavior.

[1]  Awadhesh Prasad,et al.  Targeting fixed-point solutions in nonlinear oscillators through linear augmentation. , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[2]  Ramakrishna Ramaswamy,et al.  Amplitude death in nonlinear oscillators with nonlinear coupling. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[3]  K. Bar-Eli,et al.  On the stability of coupled chemical oscillators , 1985 .

[4]  Ramakrishna Ramaswamy,et al.  Dynamical effects of integrative time-delay coupling. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[5]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Synchronization: Phase locking and frequency entrainment , 2001 .

[6]  A N Pisarchik,et al.  Experimental demonstration of attractor annihilation in a multistable fiber laser. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[7]  A. Prasad Universal occurrence of mixed-synchronization in counter-rotating nonlinear coupled oscillators , 2010, 1008.2600.

[8]  A N Pisarchik,et al.  Synchronization of semiconductor lasers with coexisting attractors. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[9]  Ira B. Schwartz,et al.  Tracking controlled chaos: Theoretical foundations and applications. , 1997, Chaos.

[10]  Goswami,et al.  Annihilation of one of the coexisting attractors in a bistable system , 2000, Physical review letters.

[11]  C. Grebogi,et al.  Multistability and the control of complexity. , 1997, Chaos.

[12]  Alexander N. Pisarchik,et al.  Oscillation death in coupled nonautonomous systems with parametrical modulation , 2003 .

[13]  K. Kaneko Dominance of Milnor Attractors and Noise-Induced Selection in a Multiattractor System , 1997 .

[14]  Awadhesh Prasad,et al.  Driving-induced bistability in coupled chaotic attractors. , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[15]  Schwartz,et al.  Tracking sustained chaos: A segmentation method , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[16]  S. Sinha,et al.  Adaptive control in nonlinear dynamics , 1990 .

[17]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Synchronization - A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences , 2001, Cambridge Nonlinear Science Series.

[18]  Awadhesh Prasad,et al.  Amplitude death in the absence of time delays in identical coupled oscillators. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[19]  Mark Hess,et al.  TRANSITION TO PHASE SYNCHRONIZATION OF CHAOS , 1998 .

[20]  Alexander N. Pisarchik,et al.  Control of multistability in a directly modulated diode laser , 2002 .

[21]  Manish Dev Shrimali,et al.  Bio-inspired computation using synthetic genetic network , 2013 .

[22]  Sen,et al.  Experimental evidence of time-delay-induced death in coupled limit-cycle oscillators , 1998, Physical review letters.

[23]  Wen-Xing Yang,et al.  Coherent control of optical bistability in an open Λ-type three-level atomic system , 2012 .

[24]  H. Fujisaka,et al.  Stability Theory of Synchronized Motion in Coupled-Oscillator Systems , 1983 .

[25]  F. Atay Distributed delays facilitate amplitude death of coupled oscillators. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[26]  Awadhesh Prasad,et al.  Controlling bistability by linear augmentation , 2013 .