The point of no return in planar hand movements: an indication of the existence of high level motion primitives

Previous psychophysical studies have sought to determine whether the processes of movement engagement and termination are dissociable, whether stopping an action is a generic process, and whether there is a point in time in which the generation of a planned action is inevitable (“point of no return”). It is not clear yet, however, whether the action of stopping is merely a manifestation of low level, dynamic constraints, or whether it is also subject to a high level, kinematic plan. In the present study, stopping performance was studied while nine subjects, who generated free scribbling movements looking for the location of an invisible circular target, were requested unexpectedly to impede movement. Temporal analysis of the data shows that in 87% of the movements subsequent to the ‘stop’ cue, the tangential motion velocity profile was not a decelerating function of the time but rather exhibited a complex pattern comprised of one or more velocity peaks, implying an unstoppable motion element. Furthermore, geometrical analysis shows that the figural properties of the path generated after the ‘stop’ cue were part of a repetitive geometrical pattern and that the probability of completing a pattern after the ‘stop’ cue was correlated with the relative advance in the geometrical plan rather than the amount of time that had elapsed from the pattern initiation. Altogether, these findings suggest that the “point of no return” phenomenon in humans may also reflect a high level kinematic plan and could serve as a new operative definition of motion primitives.

[1]  M. Kendall Statistical Methods for Research Workers , 1937, Nature.

[2]  P. Ladefoged,et al.  Interruptibility of Speech , 1970 .

[3]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  P Ladefoged,et al.  Letter: Interruptibility of speech. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  M. Hallett,et al.  Ballistic flexion movements of the human thumb. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  G. Logan On the ability to inhibit thought and action , 1984 .

[7]  J. Bachorowski,et al.  Impulsivity in adults: Motor inhibition and time-interval estimation. , 1985 .

[8]  D. Meyer,et al.  The point of no return in choice reaction time: controlled and ballistic stages of response preparation. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  Gordon D. Logan,et al.  Effects of methylphenidate on inhibitory control in hyperactive children , 1989, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[10]  J. Cooke,et al.  Movement-related phasic muscle activation. I. Relations with temporal profile of movement. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  G. Logan,et al.  In search of the point of no return: the control of response processes. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  S Kornblum,et al.  Does motor programming necessitate response execution? , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  J. Bachorowski,et al.  Impulsive motor behavior: effects of personality and goal salience. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  T. Carr,et al.  Inhibitory Processes in Attention, Memory and Language , 1994 .

[15]  G D Logan,et al.  Strategies and mechanisms in nonselective and selective inhibitory motor control. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  T. Flash,et al.  Minimum-jerk, two-thirds power law, and isochrony: converging approaches to movement planning. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  J. Sergeant,et al.  Inhibition in ADHD, aggressive, and anxious children: A biologically based model of child psychopathology , 1996, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[18]  I M Franks,et al.  A horse race between independent processes: evidence for a phantom point of no return in preparation of a speeded motor response. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  Jaap Oosterlaan,et al.  Inhibitory dysfunction in hyperactive boys , 1998, Behavioural Brain Research.

[20]  G. Logan,et al.  Development of inhibitory control across the life span. , 1999, Developmental psychology.

[21]  G. Band,et al.  Inhibitory motor control in stop paradigms: review and reinterpretation of neural mechanisms. , 1999, Acta psychologica.

[22]  Rosemary Tannock,et al.  Inhibitory Control Differences Following Mild Head Injury , 1999, Brain and Cognition.

[23]  I M Franks,et al.  Against a final ballistic process in the control of voluntary action: evidence using the Hoffmann reflex. , 2000, Motor control.

[24]  Gordon D. Logan,et al.  Confirmation of an Inhibitory Control Deficit in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder , 2000, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[25]  I M Franks,et al.  Inhibitory motor control in stop paradigms: comment on Band and van Boxtel (1999). , 2000, Acta psychologica.

[26]  Geert J. M. van Boxtel,et al.  Inhibitory motor control in stop paradigms : reply to McGarry and Franks (2000) , 2000 .

[27]  B. Pennington,et al.  A Comparison of the Neuropsychological Profiles of the DSM-IV Subtypes of ADHD , 2001, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[28]  G. Glover,et al.  Error‐related brain activation during a Go/NoGo response inhibition task , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[29]  M. W. Molen,et al.  A psychophysiological analysis of inhibitory motor control in the stop-signal paradigm , 2001, Biological Psychology.

[30]  David Zipser,et al.  Reaching to grasp with a multi-jointed arm. I. Computational model. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  Sharon Morein-Zamir,et al.  The Effect of Methylphenidate on Three Forms of Response Inhibition in Boys with AD/HD , 2003, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[32]  Ian M Franks,et al.  Stopping and Restarting an Unfolding Action at Various Times , 2003, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[33]  T. Robbins,et al.  Stop-signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior frontal gyrus in humans , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[34]  T. Flash,et al.  When practice leads to co-articulation: the evolution of geometrically defined movement primitives , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[35]  Nachshon Meiran,et al.  Individual stopping times and cognitive control: converging evidence for the stop signal task from a continuous tracking paradigm. , 2003, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[36]  M. Rieger,et al.  Inhibition of ongoing responses following frontal, nonfrontal, and basal ganglia lesions. , 2003, Neuropsychology.

[37]  D. Munoz,et al.  Inhibitory control of eye movements during oculomotor countermanding in adults with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[38]  Katya Rubia,et al.  Right inferior prefrontal cortex mediates response inhibition while mesial prefrontal cortex is responsible for error detection , 2003, NeuroImage.

[39]  J. D. Cooke,et al.  Initial agonist burst duration changes with movement amplitude in a deafferented patient , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[40]  J. Cooke,et al.  Movement-related phasic muscle activation , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[41]  D. M. MacKay Do ‘evaluation potentials’ reflect cognitive assessment? , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[42]  J. Cooke,et al.  Initial agonist burst duration depends on movement amplitude , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[43]  Romeo Chua,et al.  Inhibiting prepared and ongoing responses: Is there more than one kind of stopping? , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[44]  Sharon Morein-Zamir,et al.  Executive functioning in boys with ADHD: primarily an inhibition deficit? , 2004, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.

[45]  Robert Licht,et al.  Effects of stop signal modality, stop signal intensity and tracking method on inhibitory performance as determined by use of the stop signal paradigm. , 2005, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[46]  J. Kenemans,et al.  The pure electrophysiology of stopping. , 2005, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[47]  Daniel H. Mathalon,et al.  Fore-period effect and stop-signal reaction time , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[48]  M. Brammer,et al.  Abnormal brain activation during inhibition and error detection in medication-naive adolescents with ADHD. , 2005, The American journal of psychiatry.

[49]  Eran Stark,et al.  Partial cross-correlation analysis resolves ambiguity in the encoding of multiple movement features. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[50]  Elizabeth Torres,et al.  Space-time separation during obstacle-avoidance learning in monkeys. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[51]  Neeraj J Gandhi,et al.  Behavioral evaluation of movement cancellation. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[52]  Tamar Flash,et al.  The acquisition and implementation of the smoothness maximization motion strategy is dependent on spatial accuracy demands , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[53]  Pierpaolo Pani,et al.  Inhibitory control of reaching movements in humans , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.