Creativity and collaboration: Revisiting cybernetic serendipity

> The Sackler Colloquium “Creativity and Collaboration: Revisiting Cybernetic Serendipity” was held at the building of the National Academy of Sciences in Washington, DC on March 13–14, 2018 (www.nasonline.org/Cybernetic_Serendipity). This Sackler Colloquium celebrated the 50th anniversary of the famed art exhibit “Cybernetic Serendipity” by reconsidering how disciplinary partnerships could more reliably produce breakthrough discoveries and powerful innovation (Fig. 1). The organizer’s ambition was to redirect the history of ideas, restoring the Leonardo-like close linkage between art/design and science/engineering through widespread use of internet-enabled creativity and collaboration. > > > > Fig. 1. > Poster announcement for National Academy of Sciences’ Sackler Colloquium on “Creativity and Collaboration: Revisiting Cybernetic Serendipity.” > > Abraham Lincoln founded the US National Academy of Sciences in 1863 by way of an Act of Congress. The National Academy of Sciences Congressional Charter stipulated a nongovernmental advisory organization of scholars whose role was to “investigate, examine, experiment, and report upon any subject of science or art.” That charter, which combined “science and art” came at a time in which those disciplines were seen as closely related, maybe still infused with the spirit of Renaissance thinkers, such as Leonardo da Vinci, whose brilliant integration of art, design, science, and engineering produced astonishing breakthroughs and bold creations that have endured for 500 y. Leonardo’s training as an artist enabled him to make more accurate medical drawings, see the movement of bird wings, understand the dynamics of flowing water, and much more. Leonardo’s integrative style inspired 19th century scientists, engineers, designers, and artists, such as Charles Darwin, Louis Pasteur, James Audubon, Ada Lovelace, Samuel Morse, and others who gracefully wove together these diverse disciplines. However, during the 20th century the pressures for specialization and the emphasis on rational thinking methods pulled the sciences away from the arts. This split led to C. P. Snow’s controversial essay that portrayed the gulf … [↵][1]1Email: ben{at}cs.umd.edu. [1]: #xref-corresp-1-1

[1]  A. Klug,et al.  The structure of small viruses. , 1960, Advances in virus research.

[2]  R. Horne,et al.  Symmetry in virus architecture. , 1961, Virology.

[3]  鈴木 鎮一 Nurtured by love : a new approach to education , 1969 .

[4]  Leonard Shlain Art and Physics: Parallel Visions in Space, Time and Light - Abstract , 1991 .

[5]  I. Braverman,et al.  Use of fine art to enhance visual diagnostic skills. , 2001, JAMA.

[6]  Nadrian C. Seeman Nanotechnology and the double helix. , 2004 .

[7]  C. P. Snow TWO CULTURES , 2006, Science.

[8]  Robert Root-Bernstein,et al.  Simultaneous origin of homochirality, the genetic code and its directionality. , 2007, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[9]  S. Lipsitz,et al.  Formal Art Observation Training Improves Medical Students’ Visual Diagnostic Skills , 2008, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[10]  Randall Neff,et al.  Computer history museum , 2008, 2008 IEEE Hot Chips 20 Symposium (HCS).

[11]  Robert Root-Bernstein,et al.  Arts foster scientific success: Avocations of Nobel, National Academy, Royal Society, and Sigma Xi members. , 2008 .

[12]  Paul Glinkowski,et al.  Insight and Exchange: An evaluation of the Wellcome Trust's Sciart programme , 2009 .

[13]  Nadia Kellam,et al.  An Interdisciplinary Design Studio: How Can Art and Engineering Collaborate to Increase Students’ Creativity? , 2010 .

[14]  I. Braverman To see or not to see: how visual training can improve observational skills. , 2011, Clinics in dermatology.

[15]  T. C. Duffy,et al.  LOOKING Is Not SEEING and LISTENING Is Not HEARING: Effect of an Intervention to Enhance Auditory Skills of Graduate‐Entry Nursing Students , 2012, Nursing education perspectives.

[16]  Nadia Kellam,et al.  Quality in Interpretive Engineering Education Research: Reflections on an Example Study , 2013 .

[17]  Hearing, listening, action: Enhancing nursing practice through aural awareness education , 2014 .

[18]  L. Mckenna,et al.  Hearing, Listening, Action: Enhancing nursing practice through aural awareness education. , 2014, Contemporary nurse.

[19]  N. Seeman Art as a Stimulus for Structural DNA Nanotechnology , 2014, Leonardo.

[20]  B. Costello Correction to: Rhythm, Play and Interaction Design , 2018 .

[21]  Brigid M. Costello Rhythm, Play and Interaction Design , 2018, Springer Series on Cultural Computing.

[22]  E. Edmonds,et al.  Practice-Based Research in the Creative Arts: Foundations and Futures from the Front Line , 2017, Leonardo.

[23]  Policy,et al.  The Integration of the Humanities and Arts with Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine in Higher Education , 2018 .

[24]  D. Skorton,et al.  The Integration of the Humanities and Arts with Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine in Higher Education: Branches from the Same Tree. Consensus Study Report. , 2018 .

[25]  Sara Diamond,et al.  Addressing the imagination gap through STEAMM+D and indigenous knowledge , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Brandon G. Morton,et al.  Enabling creative collaboration for all levels of learning , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  R. Root-Bernstein,et al.  A Review of ACD-STEMM Integration, Part 2: Controlled Studies of Transdisciplinary Tools-for-Thinking Bridges for Arts-Science Pedagogy , 2017, Leonardo.

[28]  D. Skorton Branches from the same tree: The case for integration in higher education , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Interaction design of community-driven environmental projects (CDEPs): A case study from the Anacostia Watershed , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  Robert Root-Bernstein,et al.  Correlation between tools for thinking; arts, crafts, and design avocations; and scientific achievement among STEMM professionals , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  Laura Trouille,et al.  Citizen science frontiers: Efficiency, engagement, and serendipitous discovery with human–machine systems , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  J. Parrish,et al.  Hoping for optimality or designing for inclusion: Persistence, learning, and the social network of citizen science , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  Dafna Shahaf,et al.  Scaling up analogical innovation with crowds and AI , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  Jeffrey Heer,et al.  Agency plus automation: Designing artificial intelligence into interactive systems , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  Katy Börner,et al.  Data visualization literacy: Definitions, conceptual frameworks, exercises, and assessments , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  Mark Clements Co-creation Across Spaces of Uncertainty: Interdisciplinary Research and Collaborative Learning , 2020 .

[37]  Mark Clements,et al.  Cocreation across Spaces of Uncertainty: Interdisciplinary Research and Collaborative Learning , 2020, Leonardo.

[38]  N. Finkelstein,et al.  Surely You Must Be Joking, Mr. Twain!: Reengaging Science Students through Visual Aesthetics , 2020, Leonardo.