Influence of rider on lameness in trotting horses.

REASONS FOR PERFORMING STUDY Equine lameness is commonly evaluated when the horse is being ridden, but the influence of the rider on the lameness has not been documented. OBJECTIVE To document the effect of 2 riders of different training levels on the vertical movement of the head and croup. METHODS Twenty mature horses were ridden at trot by an experienced dressage rider and a novice rider, as well as trotted in hand. Kinematic measurements of markers placed on the horse's head and sacral bone were carried out. The asymmetries of the vertical head and sacral bone motion were calculated as lameness parameters and compared with paired t tests. RESULTS Trotting in hand, 17 horses showed forelimb lameness (1-4/10) and 13 hindlimb lameness (1-2/10). Intra-individually, 11 horses showed significant differences in forelimb lameness and 4 horses showed significant differences in hindlimb lameness when ridden. Over all horses, hindlimb lameness increased significantly under the dressage rider compared to unridden horses. CONCLUSIONS The presence of a rider can alter the degree of lameness; however, its influence cannot be predicted for an individual horse. POTENTIAL RELEVANCE In order to evaluate mild lameness, horses should be evaluated at trot both under saddle and in hand. If lameness is exacerbated, a second rider may be helpful; the level of training of the rider should be taken into consideration.

[1]  T. Licka,et al.  Supporting forelimb lameness: clinical judgement vs. computerised symmetry measurement. , 1999, Equine veterinary journal.

[2]  P F Pai,et al.  Signal decomposition method of evaluating head movement to measure induced forelimb lameness in horses trotting on a treadmill. , 2010, Equine veterinary journal.

[3]  T. Licka,et al.  Hindlimb lameness: clinical judgement versus computerised symmetry measurement , 2001, Veterinary Record.

[4]  P. Pourcelot,et al.  Kinematic analysis of the symmetry of limb movements in lame trotting horses. , 2001, Equine veterinary journal. Supplement.

[5]  H. Buchner,et al.  Body centre of mass movement in the lame horse. , 2001, Equine veterinary journal. Supplement.

[6]  E. Birks,et al.  Effects of mild forelimb lameness on exercise performance. , 2010, Equine veterinary journal. Supplement.

[7]  Marjorie Skubic,et al.  Detection of lameness and determination of the affected forelimb in horses by use of continuous wavelet transformation and neural network classification of kinematic data. , 2003, American journal of veterinary research.

[8]  Christian Peham,et al.  A new method to quantify harmony of the horse–rider system in dressage , 2001 .

[9]  S. May,et al.  Identification of hindleg lameness. , 1987, Equine veterinary journal.

[10]  C Peham,et al.  Compensatory movements of horses with a stance phase lameness. , 1997, Equine veterinary journal. Supplement.

[11]  P. Pourcelot,et al.  Kinematic symmetry index: a method for quantifying the horse locomotion symmetry using kinematic data. , 1997, Veterinary research.

[12]  H C Schamhardt,et al.  Head and trunk movement adaptations in horses with experimentally induced fore- or hindlimb lameness. , 1996, Equine veterinary journal.

[13]  Bryan K. Smith,et al.  Evaluation of mild lameness in horses trotting on a treadmill by clinicians and interns or residents and correlation of their assessments with kinematic gait analysis. , 1998, American journal of veterinary research.

[14]  C Peham,et al.  A method of signal processing in motion analysis of the trotting horse. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  Bryan K. Smith,et al.  Kinematics of the hind limb in trotting horses after induced lameness of the distal intertarsal and tarsometatarsal joints and intra-articular administration of anesthetic. , 2000, American journal of veterinary research.