Hearing preservation and intraoperative auditory brainstem response and cochlear nerve compound action potential monitoring in the removal of small acoustic neurinoma via the retrosigmoid approach

Objective: Hearing preservation is the main focus of small acoustic neurinoma (AN) removal. Refinement of intraoperative auditory monitoring may improve postoperative hearing. We have introduced a newly designed intracranial electrode enabling continuous monitoring of the cochlear nerve compound action potential (CNAP). We performed simultaneous monitoring of the auditory brainstem response (ABR) and CNAP during retrosigmoid small AN removal, and clarified the surgical outcome and the usefulness of CNAP monitoring. Methods: Twenty-two consecutive patients with a small AN underwent retrosigmoid tumour removal with attempting hearing preservation. ABR and CNAP were simultaneously monitored during tumour removal. Results: AN was totally removed in all patients without facial palsy. Preservation rate of useful and serviceable hearing was 82% and 91%, respectively. During microsurgical tumour removal, various surgical equipments and procedures intensified artefacts of ABR, and reliable ABR monitoring with distinct wave V was obtained in 9/22 patients. Unaffected by artefacts, reliable CNAP monitoring was obtained more frequently (in 20/22 patients) than ABR (p = 0.0005). CNAP on completion of tumour removal predicted hearing preservation with no false positive or negative (100% sensitivity and 100% specificity). CNAP changed dynamically and stepwise with surgical manipulations. Conclusion: The retrosigmoid approach using auditory monitoring for a small AN can accomplish total tumour removal with an excellent hearing preservation rate. CNAP provides reliable auditory monitoring more frequently than ABR, reflects the intraoperative auditory function almost in real-time, predicts postoperative hearing with excellent sensitivity and specificity, and is more useful for monitoring in the removal of small AN with hearing preservation.

[1]  A. De Stefano,et al.  Intraoperative Cochlear Nerve Monitoring in Vestibular Schwannoma Surgery – Does It Really Affect Hearing Outcome? , 2007, Audiology and Neurotology.

[2]  D. Kondziolka,et al.  Long-term follow-up of acoustic schwannoma radiosurgery with marginal tumor doses of 12 to 13 Gy. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  P. Theodosopoulos,et al.  Microsurgical Treatment of Small Acoustic Neuromas , 2007 .

[4]  A. Samii,et al.  Improved preservation of hearing and facial nerve function in vestibular schwannoma surgery via the retrosigmoid approach in a series of 200 patients. , 2006, Journal of neurosurgery.

[5]  A. Muacevic,et al.  Functional outcome after gamma knife treatment in vestibular schwannoma , 2006, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Head & Neck.

[6]  J. Rubinstein,et al.  Small Acoustic Neuromas: Surgical Outcomes Versus Observation or Radiation , 2006, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[7]  H. El-Kashlan,et al.  Hearing Preservation and Facial Nerve Outcomes in Vestibular Schwannoma Surgery: Results Using the Middle Cranial Fossa Approach , 2006, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[8]  G. Mohr,et al.  Preservation of hearing in patients undergoing microsurgery for vestibular schwannoma: degree of meatal filling. , 2005, Journal of neurosurgery.

[9]  G. Horstmann,et al.  Increased preservation of functional hearing after gamma knife surgery for vestibular schwannoma. , 2005, Journal of neurosurgery.

[10]  G. Horstmann,et al.  Increased preservation of functional hearing after gamma knife surgery for vestibular schwannoma. , 2005, Journal of neurosurgery.

[11]  B. Warf,et al.  Hydrocephalus in Uganda: the predominance of infectious origin and primary management with endoscopic third ventriculostomy. , 2005, Journal of neurosurgery.

[12]  R. Cueva,et al.  A Comparison of Direct Eighth Nerve Monitoring and Auditory Brainstem Response in Hearing Preservation Surgery for Vestibular Schwannoma , 2004, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[13]  A. Yamaura,et al.  Removal of large acoustic neurinomas (vestibular schwannomas) by the retrosigmoid approach with no mortality and minimal morbidity , 2004, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[14]  S. Schmerber,et al.  Intraoperative auditory monitoring in vestibular schwannoma surgery: new trends , 2004, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[15]  K. Kaga,et al.  Effects of deep hypothermia and circulatory arrest on the auditory brain stem responses , 2004, Archives of oto-rhino-laryngology.

[16]  A. Yamaura,et al.  Intraoperative monitoring of cochlear nerve compound action potential in cerebellopontine angle tumour removal , 2003, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[17]  A. Yamaura,et al.  [Intraoperative monitoring of hearing function in the removal of cerebellopontine angle tumor: auditory brainstem response and cochlear nerve compound action potential]. , 2002, No shinkei geka. Neurological surgery.

[18]  S. Wolf,et al.  Enlarged Middle Fossa Vestibular Schwannoma Surgery: Experience With 735 Cases , 2001, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[19]  A. Yamaura,et al.  Prevention of cerebrospinal fluid leakage and delayed loss of preserved hearing after vestibular schwannoma removal: reconstruction of the internal auditory canal in the suboccipital transmeatal approach--technical note. , 2000, Neurologia medico-chirurgica.

[20]  M. Samii,et al.  Gamma surgery for vestibular schwannoma. , 2000, Journal of neurosurgery.

[21]  Jackson Le,et al.  Acoustic neuroma surgery: use of cochlear nerve action potential monitoring for hearing preservation. , 2000, The American journal of otology.

[22]  R. Battista,et al.  Evaluation of three intraoperative auditory monitoring techniques in acoustic neuroma surgery. , 2000, The American journal of otology.

[23]  A. Mazzoni,et al.  A modified retrosigmoid approach for direct exposure of the fundus of the internal auditory canal for hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma surgery. , 2000, The American journal of otology.

[24]  J. Roberson,et al.  Acoustic neuroma surgery: use of cochlear nerve action potential monitoring for hearing preservation. , 2000, The American journal of otology.

[25]  J. Roberson,et al.  Acoustic neuroma surgery: Absent auditory brainstem response does not contraindicate attempted hearing preservation , 1999, The Laryngoscope.

[26]  F. Fiorino,et al.  Retrosigmoid-Transmeatal en Bloc Removal of Small to Medium-Sized Acoustic Neuromas , 1996, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[27]  J. Régis,et al.  Preservation of Hearing in Acoustic Neuromas Treated by Gamma Knife Surgery , 1998, Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery.

[28]  C. Matula,et al.  Neurotopographic considerations in the microsurgical treatment of small acoustic neurinomas. , 1998, Journal of neurosurgery.

[29]  V. Colletti,et al.  ECochG, CNAP and ABR monitoring during vestibular Schwannoma surgery. , 1998, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[30]  D. Brackmann,et al.  Middle fossa approach for hearing preservation with acoustic neuromas. , 1997, The American journal of otology.

[31]  T. Fukushima,et al.  Individualizing Hearing Preservation in Acoustic Neuroma Surgery , 1997, The Laryngoscope.

[32]  M. Samii,et al.  Management of Vestibular Schwannomas (Acoustic Neuromas): The Value of Neurophysiology for Evaluation and Prediction of Auditory Function in 420 Cases , 1997 .

[33]  M. Samii,et al.  Management of vestibular schwannomas (acoustic neuromas): the value of neurophysiology for evaluation and prediction of auditory function in 420 cases. , 1997, Neurosurgery.

[34]  D. Brackmann,et al.  Direct cochlear nerve action potentials as an aid to hearing preservation in middle fossa acoustic neuroma resection. , 1996, The American journal of otology.

[35]  A. Møller.  Monitoring auditory function during operations to remove acoustic tumors. , 1996, The American journal of otology.

[36]  L. Sacchetto,et al.  Iatrogenic impairment of hearing during surgery for acoustic neuroma. , 1996, Skull base surgery.

[37]  Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium Guidelines for the Evaluation of Hearing Preservation in Acoustic Neuroma (Vestibular Schwannoma) ∗ : Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium , 1995 .

[38]  A. Bricolo,et al.  Changes in directly recorded cochlear nerve compound action potentials during acoustic tumor surgery. , 1994, Skull base surgery.

[39]  R A Levine,et al.  Preservation of hearing and facial nerve function in resection of acoustic neuroma , 1992, The Laryngoscope.

[40]  A. Møller,et al.  Avulsion rupture of the internal auditory artery during operations in the cerebellopontine angle: a study in monkeys. , 1987, Neurosurgery.

[41]  A. Lam,et al.  The Effects of Isoflurane and Isoflurane‐Nitrous Oxide Anesthesia on Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potentials in Humans , 1985, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[42]  A. Jones,et al.  American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation, Inc. , 2004 .

[43]  A. Møller,et al.  Intracranially recorded auditory nerve response in man. New interpretations of BSER. , 1982, Archives of otolaryngology.

[44]  A. Møller,et al.  Compound action potentials recorded intracranially from the auditory nerve in man , 1981, Experimental Neurology.

[45]  D. Brackmann,et al.  Acoustic tumor detection with brain stem electric response audiometry. , 1977, Archives of otolaryngology.