Adding attenuation corrected images in myocardial perfusion imaging reduces the need for a rest study

BackgroundThe American Society of Nuclear Cardiology and the Society of Nuclear Medicine conclude that incorporation of attenuation corrected (AC) images in myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) will improve diagnostic accuracy. The aim was to investigate the value of adding AC stress-only images for the decision whether a rest study is necessary or not.Methods1,261 patients admitted to 99mTc MPS were studied. The stress studies were interpreted by two physicians who judged each study as “no rest study necessary” or “rest study necessary”, by evaluating NC stress-only and NC + AC stress-only images. When there was disagreement between the two physicians, a third physician evaluated the studies. Thus, agreement between 2 out of 3 physicians was evaluated.ResultsThe physicians assessed 214 more NC + AC images than NC images as “no rest study necessary” (17% of the study population). The number of no-rest-study-required was significantly higher for NC + AC studies compared to NC studies (859 vs 645 cases (p < 0.0001). In the final report according to clinical routine, ischemia or infarction was reported in 23 patients, assessed as “no rest study necessary” (22 NC + AC cases; 8 NC cases), (no statistically significant difference). In 11 of these, the final report stated “suspected/possible ischemia or infarction in a small area”.ConclusionsAdding AC stress-only images to NC stress-only images reduce the number of unnecessary rest studies substantially.

[1]  E G DePuey,et al.  Optimal specificity of thallium-201 SPECT through recognition of imaging artifacts. , 1989, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[2]  D. Berman,et al.  Exercise myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients without known coronary artery disease: incremental prognostic value and use in risk stratification. , 1996, Circulation.

[3]  T R Miller,et al.  Rapidly converging iterative reconstruction algorithms in single-photon emission computed tomography. , 1993, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  G V Heller,et al.  Multicenter clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of correction for photon attenuation and scatter in SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. , 1999, Circulation.

[5]  E. E. van der Wall,et al.  Should imaging at stress always be followed by imaging at rest in Tc-99m MIBI SPECT? , 1997, The International Journal of Cardiac Imaging.

[6]  J. Sýkora,et al.  Attenuation-corrected thallium-201 single-photon emission tomography using a gadolinium-153 moving line source: clinical value and the impact of attenuation correction on the extent and severity of perfusion abnormalities , 1998, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  R. Hendel,et al.  American Society of Nuclear Cardiology and Society of Nuclear Medicine joint position statement: Attenuation correction of myocardial perfusion SPECT scintigraphy , 2004, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[8]  A. Vija,et al.  An Attenuation Correction System for a Dedicated Small FOV, Dual Head, Fixed-90°, Cardiac Gamma Camera Using Arrays of Gd-153 Line Sources , 2006, 2006 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[9]  A. Iskandrian,et al.  Risk assessment using single-photon emission computed tomographic technetium-99m sestamibi imaging. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  Jonathan M. Links,et al.  Attenuation correction and gating synergistically improve the diagnostic accuracy of myocardial perfusion SPECT , 2002, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[11]  Frans J. Th. Wackers,et al.  Clinical validation of SPECT attenuation correction using x-ray computed tomography—derived attenuation maps: Multicenter clinical trial with angiographic correlation , 2005, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[12]  M. Lomsky,et al.  Can Nuclear Medicine Technologists Assess Whether a Myocardial Perfusion Rest Study Is Required? , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

[13]  Randall C. Thompson,et al.  Value of attenuation correction on ECG-gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging related to body mass index , 2005, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[14]  D. Berman,et al.  Incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography for the prediction of cardiac death: differential stratification for risk of cardiac death and myocardial infarction. , 1998, Circulation.

[15]  J M Links,et al.  Combined corrections for attenuation, depthdependent blur, and motion in cardiac SPECT: A multicenter trial , 2000, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[16]  A. Fung,et al.  Comparison of stress-only vs. stress/rest with technetium-99m methoxyisobutylisonitrile myocardial perfusion imaging , 2004, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[17]  S. Blum,et al.  Normal stress-only versus standard stress/rest myocardial perfusion imaging: similar patient mortality with reduced radiation exposure. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  E. Ficaro,et al.  Clinical review of attenuation-corrected cardiac SPECT , 1999, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[19]  J. Case,et al.  Clinical value of attenuation correction in stress-only Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT imaging , 2004, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[20]  J. Knuuti,et al.  EANM/ESC procedural guidelines for myocardial perfusion imaging in nuclear cardiology , 2005, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.