A network approach for modeling and design of agile supply chains using a flexibility construct

Agility can be viewed as a need to encourage the enterprise-wide integration of flexible and core competent resources so as to offer value-added product and services in a volatile competitive environment. Since flexibility is considered a property that provides change capabilities of different enterprise-wide resources and processes in time and cost dimensions, supply chain flexibility can be considered a composite state to enterprise-wide resources to meet agility needs. Enterprise modeling frameworks depicting these composite flexibility states are difficult to model because of the complex and tacit interrelationship among system parameters and also because agility thrives on many business objectives. In view of this, the modeling framework presented in this paper is based on analytical network process (ANP) since this methodology can accommodate the complex and tacit interrelationship among factors affecting enterprise agility. The modeling framework forms a three-level network with the goal of attaining agility from the perspective of market, product, and customer as the actors. The goal depends on substrategies that address the characteristics of the three actors. Each of these substrategies further depends on manufacturing, logistic, sourcing, and information technology (IT) flexibility elements of the enterprise supply chain (SC). The research highlights that, under different environmental conditions, enterprises require synergy among appropriate supply chain flexibilities for practising agility. In the present research, the ANP modeling software tool Super Decisions™ has been used for relative prioritization of the supply chain flexibilities. We demonstrate through sensitivity analysis that dynamic conditions do require adjustments in the enterprise-wide flexibility spectrum.

[1]  D. Upton Process range in manufacturing: an empirical study of flexibility , 1997 .

[2]  Giovani J.C. da Silveira,et al.  Mass customization: Literature review and research directions , 2001 .

[3]  Stanley E. Fawcett,et al.  ENHANCING LOGISTICS PERFORMANCE TO IMPROVE THE COMPETITIVENESS OF MANUFACTURING ORGANIZATIONS , 1996 .

[4]  Sai Ho Chung,et al.  A heuristic methodology for order distribution in a demand driven collaborative supply chain , 2004 .

[5]  Patricia M. Swafford A Model of Global Supply Chain Agility and its Impact on Competitive Performance , 2000 .

[6]  Joseph Sarkis A STRATEGIC DECISION FRAMEWORK FOR GREEN SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT , 2003 .

[7]  John A. Sharp,et al.  A review of manufacturing flexibility , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  N. R. Srinivasa Raghavan,et al.  Flexibility in manufacturing enterprises , 1997 .

[9]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Analyzing organizational project alternatives for agile manufacturing processes: An analytical network approach , 1999 .

[10]  R. Nagel,et al.  Agile Competitors and Virtual Organizations: Strategies for Enriching the Customer , 1994 .

[11]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision making with dependence and feedback : the analytic network process : the organization and prioritization of complexity , 1996 .

[12]  Ian Barclay,et al.  Agile manufacturing: A management and operational framework , 2001 .

[13]  Paul T. Kidd,et al.  Agile Manufacturing: Forging New Frontiers , 1994 .

[14]  S. Wadhwa,et al.  Modeling FMS with decision Petri nets , 1989 .

[15]  Robert J. Vokurka,et al.  The journey toward agility , 1998 .

[16]  A. Gunasekaran,et al.  Agile manufacturing: The drivers, concepts and attributes , 1999 .

[17]  Stefan H. Thomke,et al.  The Role of Flexibility in the Development of New Products , 1997 .

[18]  Danny Berry,et al.  Leagility: Integrating the lean and agile manufacturing paradigms in the total supply chain , 1999 .

[19]  Robert J. Vokurka,et al.  A conceptual model of supply chain flexibility , 2003, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[20]  Ram Narasimhan,et al.  Manufacturing agility and supply chain management practices , 1999 .

[21]  I. Nonaka,et al.  How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation , 1995 .

[22]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Justifying strategic alliances and partnering: a prerequisite for virtual enterprising , 1997 .

[23]  R. Handfield,et al.  Supply Chain Management: Supplier Performance and Firm Performance , 1998 .

[24]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  AGILE MANUFACTURING: ENABLERS AND AN IMPLEMENTATION FRAMEWORK , 1998 .

[25]  Jeffrey Miller,et al.  Flexibility: The Next Competitive Battle: The Manufacturing Futures Survey , 1989 .

[26]  A. Meyer,et al.  Lasting Improvements in Manufacturing Performance: In Search of a New Theory , 1990 .

[27]  Hossein Sharifi,et al.  A methodology for achieving agility in manufacturing organisations : An introduction , 1999 .

[28]  Subhash Wadhwa,et al.  Flexibility: an emerging meta-competence for managing high technology , 2000, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[29]  Stanley E. Fawcett,et al.  Comparative Logistics and Production Costs for Global Manufacturing Strategy , 1993 .

[30]  Mohamed A. Youssef,et al.  The impact of some recent developments in e‐business on the management of next generation manufacturing , 2001 .

[31]  David Upton,et al.  Flexibility as process mobility: The management of plant capabilities for quick response manufacturing , 1995 .

[32]  Jan Olhager,et al.  The house of flexibility: using the QFD approach to deploy manufacturing flexibility , 2002 .

[33]  R. Jaikumar Postindustrial manufacturing , 1986 .

[34]  S. L. Yang,et al.  Agility Evaluation of Mass Customization Product Manufacturing , 2002 .

[35]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Agile manufacturing: A framework for research and development , 1999 .

[36]  K. E. Stecke,et al.  Procedures to determine part mix ratios for independent demands in flexible manufacturing systems , 1992 .