TRAINING LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS TO DETECT DECEPTION : A CRITIQUE OF PREVIOUS RESEARCH AND FRAMEWORK FOR THE FUTURE

This article reviews principles of effective training (Beebe, Mottet, & Roach, 2004), explicates the strengths and weaknesses of deception detection training research, and proposes a research agenda for deception detection training within the law enforcement context. Overall, deception detection training studies to-date fail to follow principles of effective training. Trainee needs are not assessed, training content is lacking, and the trainer and trainee engage in passive roles. A model is proposed with the aim of providing a conceptual framework for thinking about deception detection training and establishing a research agenda for future studies. In particular, it extends previously suggested changes to deception detection training research (Frank & Feeley, 2003), applies principles of effective training methods (Beebe et al., 2004), and calls for a context-dependent (Flyvbjerg, 2001) shift in deception detection training studies.

[1]  James J. Lindsay,et al.  Cues to deception. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  Maria Hartwig,et al.  Strategic Use of Evidence During Police Interviews: When Training to Detect Deception Works , 2006, Law and human behavior.

[3]  B. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain , 1966 .

[4]  Kenneth D. Craig,et al.  Detecting Deception in Facial Expressions of Pain: Accuracy and Training , 2004, The Clinical journal of pain.

[5]  Thomas Hugh Feeley,et al.  Testing the Effects of Nonverbal Behavior Training on Accuracy in Deception Detection with the Inclusion of a Bogus Training Control Group , 2005 .

[6]  Aldert Vrij,et al.  Who killed my relative? police officers' ability to detect real-life high-stake lies , 2001 .

[7]  K. Fiedler,et al.  Training lie detectors to use nonverbal cues instead of global heuristics , 1993 .

[8]  Gerald R. Miller,et al.  Training Observers to Detect Deception: Effects of Self-Monitoring and Rehearsal. , 1990 .

[9]  A. Vrij Detecting Lies and Deceit: The Psychology of Lying and the Implications for Professional Practice , 2000 .

[10]  Mark A. deTurck Training observers to detect spontaneous deception: Effects of gender , 1991 .

[11]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  A Comparison of Instructor-Led vs. Web-based Training for Detecting Deception , 2007 .

[12]  Dr Aldert Vrij,et al.  Individual differences between liars and the ability to detect lies , 1997 .

[13]  Alan H. Schoenfeld,et al.  When Good Teaching Leads to Bad Results: The Disasters of 'Well-Taught' Mathematics Courses , 1988 .

[14]  R. Koestner,et al.  Learning to detect deception. , 1984 .

[15]  Aldert Vrij,et al.  The impact of information and setting on detection of deception by police detectives , 1994 .

[16]  Thomas Hugh Feeley,et al.  Vocal and visual cue training in behavioral lie detection , 1997 .

[17]  L. Shulman Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform , 1987 .

[18]  Fred E. Inbau,et al.  Criminal Interrogation and Confessions , 1967 .

[19]  B. Depaulo,et al.  On-the-Job Experience and Skill at Detecting Deception1 , 1986 .

[20]  B. Flyvbjerg,et al.  Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again , 2001 .

[21]  Paul Ekman,et al.  A Few Can Catch a Liar , 1999 .

[22]  Gerald R. Miller,et al.  Deception and arousal: Isolating the behavioral correlates of deception. , 1985 .

[23]  Alan H. Schoenfeld,et al.  Problem Solving in the Mathematics Curriculum. A Report, Recommendations, and an Annotated Bibliography. MAA Notes, Number 1. , 1983 .

[24]  Maria Hartwig,et al.  Police Officers’ Lie Detection Accuracy: Interrogating Freely Versus Observing Video , 2004 .

[25]  Günter Köhnken,et al.  Training police officers to detect deceptive eyewitness statements: Does it work? , 1987 .

[26]  P. Ekman,et al.  Who can catch a liar? , 1991, The American psychologist.

[27]  R. Koestner,et al.  Learning to detect deception from three communication channels , 1985 .

[28]  Robert J. Kibler,et al.  Objectives for Instruction and Evaluation , 1974 .

[29]  Christina T. Fong,et al.  “I'm Innocent!”: Effects of Training on Judgments of Truth and Deception in the Interrogation Room , 1999 .

[30]  Ray Bull,et al.  Suspects, Lies, and Videotape: An Analysis of Authentic High-Stake Liars , 2002, Law and human behavior.

[31]  Thomas Hugh Feeley,et al.  To Catch a Liar: Challenges for Research in Lie Detection Training , 2003 .

[32]  Douglas Carnine,et al.  Direct Instruction , 1998 .

[33]  Mark A. deTurck,et al.  The effects of training social perceivers to detect deception from behavioral cues , 1990 .

[34]  Ray Bull,et al.  Detecting true lies: police officers' ability to detect suspects' lies. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.