A verbal invitation and specimen collection on the spot are crucial to maximise sexually transmissible infection testing uptake in non-traditional settings.

Non-traditional settings offer an opportunity to increase access to sexually transmissible infection testing for at-risk populations, but they have not yet proven to be an efficient option and current models are unlikely to be effective if scaled up.

[1]  C. Swannell.  Socio-demographic and structural barriers to being tested for chlamydia in general practice , 2016 .

[2]  M. Chiasson,et al.  Exploring pharmacy and home-based sexually transmissible infection testing. , 2015, Sexual health.

[3]  Jane Hall,et al.  The use of financial incentives in Australian general practice , 2015, The Medical journal of Australia.

[4]  J. Kaldor,et al.  Chlamydia prevalence in young attenders of rural and regional primary care services in Australia: a cross‐sectional survey , 2014, The Medical journal of Australia.

[5]  J. Kaldor,et al.  Outreach for chlamydia and gonorrhoea screening: a systematic review of strategies and outcomes , 2013, BMC Public Health.

[6]  R. Clifford,et al.  Chlamydia screening interventions from community pharmacies: a systematic review. , 2013, Sexual health.

[7]  J. Kaldor,et al.  Home-based chlamydia and gonorrhoea screening: a systematic review of strategies and outcomes , 2013, BMC Public Health.

[8]  J. Hocking,et al.  Community pharmacy and cash reward: a winning combination for chlamydia screening? , 2012, Sexually Transmitted Infections.

[9]  Boris V. Schmid,et al.  Effectiveness of yearly, register based screening for chlamydia in the Netherlands: controlled trial with randomised stepped wedge implementation , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[10]  J. Hocking,et al.  Advertising sexual health services that provide sexually transmissible infection screening for rural young people - what works and what doesn't. , 2011, Sexual health.