Deep learning model fitting for diffusion-relaxometry: a comparative study

Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging (qMRI) signal model fitting is traditionally performed via non-linear least square (NLLS) estimation. NLLS is slow and its performance can be affected by the presence of different local minima in the fitting objective function. Recently, machine learning techniques, including deep neural networks (DNNs), have been proposed as robust alternatives to NLLS. Here we present a deep learning implementation of qMRI model fitting, which uses DNNs to perform the inversion of the forward signal model. We compare two DNN training strategies, based on two alternative definitions of the loss function, since at present it is not known which definition leads to the most accurate, precise and robust parameter estimation. In strategy 1 we define the loss as the l2-norm of tissue parameter prediction errors, while in strategy 2 as the l2-norm of MRI signal prediction errors. We compare the two approaches on synthetic and 3T in vivo saturation inversion recovery (SIR) diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI data, using a model for joint diffusion-T1 mapping. Strategy 1 leads to lower tissue parameter root mean squared errors (RMSEs) when realistic noise distributions are considered (e.g. Rician vs Gaussian). However, strategy 2 offers lower signal reconstruction RMSE, and allows training to be performed on both synthetic and actual in vivo MRI measurements. In conclusion, both strategies are valid choices for DNN-based fitting. Strategy 2 is more practical, as it does not require pre-computation of reference tissue parameters, but may lead to worse parameter estimation.

[1]  Bibek Dhital,et al.  Gibbs‐ringing artifact removal based on local subvoxel‐shifts , 2015, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  F. Kruggel,et al.  Quantitative mapping of the per‐axon diffusion coefficients in brain white matter , 2015, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  Daniel C. Alexander,et al.  Machine learning based compartment models with permeability for white matter microstructure imaging , 2017, NeuroImage.

[4]  Roger C. Tam,et al.  Myelin water imaging data analysis in less than one minute , 2020, NeuroImage.

[5]  Daan Christiaens,et al.  Integrated and efficient diffusion-relaxometry using ZEBRA , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[6]  Jelle Veraart,et al.  Multi-parametric quantitative in vivo spinal cord MRI with unified signal readout and image denoising , 2020, NeuroImage.

[7]  Ming Zhao,et al.  Saturation-inversion-recovery: A method for T1 measurement. , 2017, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[8]  Jan Sijbers,et al.  Denoising of diffusion MRI using random matrix theory , 2016, NeuroImage.

[9]  Cheng Guan Koay,et al.  Analytically exact correction scheme for signal extraction from noisy magnitude MR signals. , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[10]  Ben Jeurissen,et al.  T1 relaxometry of crossing fibres in the human brain , 2016, NeuroImage.

[11]  Sébastien Ourselin,et al.  Reconstructing a 3D structure from serial histological sections , 2001, Image Vis. Comput..

[12]  Stephen J. Wright,et al.  Numerical Optimization , 2018, Fundamental Statistical Inference.

[13]  Stefan Skare,et al.  How to correct susceptibility distortions in spin-echo echo-planar images: application to diffusion tensor imaging , 2003, NeuroImage.

[14]  Daniel Cremers,et al.  q-Space Deep Learning: Twelve-Fold Shorter and Model-Free Diffusion MRI Scans , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Fast robust automated brain extraction , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[16]  George Cybenko,et al.  Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function , 1989, Math. Control. Signals Syst..

[17]  Hans Knutsson,et al.  Bayesian uncertainty quantification in linear models for diffusion MRI , 2017, NeuroImage.

[18]  Jimmy Ba,et al.  Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.

[19]  W. M. Rainforth,et al.  Segregation mediated heterogeneous structure in a metastable β titanium alloy with a superior combination of strength and ductility , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[20]  J. Veraart,et al.  Degeneracy in model parameter estimation for multi‐compartmental diffusion in neuronal tissue , 2016, NMR in biomedicine.

[21]  Sebastiano Barbieri,et al.  Submitted to Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Deep Learning How to Fit an Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Model to Diffusion-Weighted MRI , 2019 .

[22]  D K Smith,et al.  Numerical Optimization , 2001, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[23]  Mara Cercignani,et al.  Brain microstructure by multi-modal MRI: Is the whole greater than the sum of its parts? , 2017, NeuroImage.

[24]  Daniel C. Alexander,et al.  SANDI: A compartment-based model for non-invasive apparent soma and neurite imaging by diffusion MRI , 2019, NeuroImage.