Iterative Sparse Channel Estimation and Spatial Correlation Learning for Multichannel Acoustic OFDM Systems

This article addresses the problem of coherent detection of acoustic orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) signals using a sparse channel estimation method based on a physical model of multipath propagation. Unlike the conventional sample-spaced and subsample-spaced methods, such as least squares and orthogonal matching pursuit (OMP), which target the taps of an equivalent discrete-delay channel response, the path identification (PI) method targets the physical propagation paths in a continuous-delay domain, and focuses on explicit estimation of delays and complex amplitudes of the channel paths in an iterative fashion. When multiple receive elements are available, two situations are possible: one in which the array elements see uncorrelated channel responses, and another in which the channel responses are correlated. In the first case, channel estimation must be accomplished element-by-element. This is done simply by applying the PI algorithm to each element individually. In the second case, correlation between the elements can be exploited. In doing so, our goal is to reduce the signal processing complexity without compromising the performance. Toward this goal, an adaptive precombining method is proposed. Without requiring any a priori knowledge about the spatial distribution of received signals, the method exploits spatial coherence between receive channels by linearly combining them into fewer output channels so as to reduce the number of subsequent channel estimators. The algorithm learns the spatial coherence pattern recursively over the carriers, thus effectively achieving broadband beamforming. The reduced-complexity precombining method relies on differential encoding that keeps the receiver complexity at a minimum and requires a very low pilot overhead. Using synthetic data as well as 210 experimental signals transmitted over a 3–7-km shallow-water channel in the 10.5–15.5-kHz acoustic band during a 3.5-h experiment, we study the system performance in terms of data detection mean-squared error (MSE), symbol error rate, and bit error rate (BER), and show that the PI algorithm achieves excellent MSE performance while its complexity is considerably lower than that of the OMP algorithm. We also demonstrate that the receiver equipped with the proposed reduced-complexity precombining scheme requires three times fewer channel estimators while achieving the same MSE and BER performance as the full-complexity receiver.

[1]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[2]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  Underwater acoustic communication channels: Propagation models and statistical characterization , 2009, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[3]  Jon Hamkins Performance of low-density parity-check coded modulation , 2010, 2010 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[4]  S.K. Wilson,et al.  On channel estimation in OFDM systems , 1995, 1995 IEEE 45th Vehicular Technology Conference. Countdown to the Wireless Twenty-First Century.

[5]  Geoffrey Ye Li,et al.  Robust channel estimation for OFDM systems with rapid dispersive fading channels , 1998, ICC '98. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Communications. Conference Record. Affiliated with SUPERCOMM'98 (Cat. No.98CH36220).

[6]  Lee Freitag,et al.  Performance of Micro-Modem PSK signaling with a mobile transmitter during the 2010 MACE experiment , 2015, OCEANS 2015 - Genova.

[7]  L. Freitag,et al.  This article has been accepted for inclusion in a future issue of this journal. Content is final as presented, with the exception of pagination. IEEE JOURNAL OF OCEANIC ENGINEERING 1 Peer-Reviewed Technical Communication Multicarrier Communication Over Un , 2022 .

[8]  Yashar M. Aval,et al.  Differentially Coherent Multichannel Detection of Acoustic OFDM Signals , 2015, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[9]  Shu Lin,et al.  Channel Codes: Classical and Modern , 2009 .

[10]  M. Stojanovic,et al.  This article has been accepted for inclusion in a future issue of this journal. Content is final as presented, with the exception of pagination. IEEE JOURNAL OF OCEANIC ENGINEERING 1 Multiple-Resampling Receiver Design for OFDM Over Doppler-Distorted Unde , 2011 .

[11]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Matrix computations , 1983 .

[12]  J. Preisig,et al.  Estimation of Rapidly Time-Varying Sparse Channels , 2007, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[13]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  Low-Complexity Superresolution Frequency Offset Estimation for High Data Rate Acoustic OFDM Systems , 2019, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[14]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  Estimation and tracking of time-varying channels in OFDM systems , 2014, 2014 52nd Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton).

[15]  O. Edfors,et al.  OFDM channel estimation by singular value decomposition , 1996, Proceedings of Vehicular Technology Conference - VTC.

[16]  Patrick Robertson,et al.  Two-dimensional pilot-symbol-aided channel estimation by Wiener filtering , 1997, 1997 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[17]  Shengli Zhou,et al.  Sparse channel estimation for multicarrier underwater acoustic communication: From subspace methods to compressed sensing , 2009, OCEANS 2009-EUROPE.

[18]  M. Stojanovic,et al.  An adaptive algorithm for differentially coherent detection in the presence of intersymbol interference , 2005, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[19]  R. Negi,et al.  Pilot Tone Selection For Channel Estimation In A Mobile Ofdm System * , 1998, International 1998 Conference on Consumer Electronics.

[20]  Geert Leus,et al.  Pilot-Assisted Time-Varying Channel Estimation for OFDM Systems , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[21]  Ramjee Prasad,et al.  OFDM for Wireless Multimedia Communications , 1999 .

[22]  J. Navarro-Pedreño Numerical Methods for Least Squares Problems , 1996 .

[23]  Ronald A. Iltis,et al.  Iterative Carrier Frequency Offset and Channel Estimation for Underwater Acoustic OFDM Systems , 2008, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[24]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Introduction to Applied Linear Algebra , 2018 .

[25]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  Adaptive OFDM Modulation for Underwater Acoustic Communications: Design Considerations and Experimental Results , 2014, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[26]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  Exploitation of Spatial Coherence for Reducing the Complexity of Acoustic OFDM Systems , 2018, 2018 Fourth Underwater Communications and Networking Conference (UComms).

[27]  M. Stojanovic,et al.  Low Complexity OFDM Detector for Underwater Acoustic Channels , 2006, OCEANS 2006.

[28]  D.J.C. MacKay,et al.  Good error-correcting codes based on very sparse matrices , 1997, Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory.

[29]  M. Stojanovic,et al.  Statistical Characterization and Computationally Efficient Modeling of a Class of Underwater Acoustic Communication Channels , 2013, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[30]  V. Bhargava,et al.  An investigation into time-domain approach for OFDM channel estimation , 2000, IEEE Trans. Broadcast..

[31]  J. Proakis,et al.  Reduced‐complexity spatial and temporal processing of underwater acoustic communication signals , 1995 .