On Interim Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing in Learning Context

Interim assessment occurs throughout instruction to provide feedback about what students know and have achieved. Different from the current available cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing (CD-CAT) design that focuses on assessment at a single time point, the authors discuss several designs of interim CD-CAT that are suitable in the learning context. The interim CD-CAT differs from the current available CD-CAT designs primarily because students’ mastery profile (i.e., skills mastery) changes due to learning, and new attributes are added periodically. Moreover, hierarchies exist among attributes taught sequentially and such information could be used during item selection. Two specific designs are considered: The first one is when new attributes are taught in Stage II, but the student mastery status of the previously taught attributes stays the same. The second design is when both new attributes are taught, and previously taught attributes can be further learned or forgotten in Stage II. For both designs, the authors propose an individual prior, which considers a person’s learning history and population learning model, to start an interim CD-CAT. Simulation results show that the Stage II CD-CAT using individual prior outperforms the methods using population priors. The GDINA (generalized deterministic inputs, noisy, “and” gate) diagnostic index (GDI) is extended to accommodate item hierarchies, and analytic results are provided to further illustrate the types of items that are most popular during item selection. As the first study that focuses on the application of CD-CAT in a learning context, the methods and results present herein showed the great promise of using CD-CAT to monitor learning.

[1]  Maurice M. Tatsuoka,et al.  Graph Theory and Its Applications in Educational Research: A Review and Integration , 1986 .

[2]  Morris De Beer,et al.  Technology and Testing , 2013 .

[3]  J. D. L. Torre,et al.  The Generalized DINA Model Framework. , 2011 .

[4]  Jeffrey A Douglas,et al.  Higher-order latent trait models for cognitive diagnosis , 2004 .

[5]  Laine Bradshaw,et al.  Hierarchical Diagnostic Classification Models: A Family of Models for Estimating and Testing Attribute Hierarchies , 2014, Psychometrika.

[6]  Alan Huebner,et al.  A Note on Comparing Examinee Classification Methods for Cognitive Diagnosis Models , 2011 .

[7]  Wen-yi Wang,et al.  A Note on the Relationship of the Shannon Entropy Procedure and the Jensen–Shannon Divergence in Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing , 2020 .

[8]  S. Embretson A general latent trait model for response processes , 1984 .

[9]  Lesa Hoffman,et al.  Obtaining Diagnostic Classification Model Estimates Using Mplus , 2013 .

[10]  Juan Ramón Barrada,et al.  New Item Selection Methods for Cognitive Diagnosis Computerized Adaptive Testing , 2015, Applied psychological measurement.

[11]  Steven Andrew Culpepper,et al.  A Hidden Markov Model for Learning Trajectories in Cognitive Diagnosis With Application to Spatial Rotation Skills , 2018, Applied psychological measurement.

[12]  A. Cohen,et al.  A Latent Transition Analysis Model for Assessing Change in Cognitive Skills , 2016, Educational and psychological measurement.

[13]  Chia-Yi Chiu,et al.  Nonparametric CAT for CD in Educational Settings With Small Samples , 2019, Applied psychological measurement.

[14]  John T. Willse,et al.  Defining a Family of Cognitive Diagnosis Models Using Log-Linear Models with Latent Variables , 2009 .

[15]  Jing Lu,et al.  Learning Attribute Hierarchies From Data: Two Exploratory Approaches , 2020 .

[16]  Matthew J Madison,et al.  Assessing Growth in a Diagnostic Classification Model Framework , 2018, Psychometrika.

[17]  Chun Wang,et al.  Mutual Information Item Selection Method in Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing With Short Test Length , 2013 .

[18]  G. Gage Kingsbury Adaptive Item Calibration : A Process for Estimating Item Parameters Within a Computerized Adaptive Test , 2010 .

[19]  Mark J. Gierl,et al.  Cognitive diagnostic assessment for education: Theory and applications. , 2007 .

[20]  Hua-Hua Chang,et al.  An Enhanced Approach to Combine Item Response Theory With Cognitive Diagnosis in Adaptive Testing , 2014 .

[21]  James W Pellegrino,et al.  Technology and Testing , 2009, Science.

[22]  A. Kluger,et al.  The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. , 1996 .

[23]  Chun Wang,et al.  On initial item selection in cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing. , 2016, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[24]  G. S. Hanna Effects of Total and Partial Feedback in Multiple-Choice Testing Upon Learning , 1976 .

[25]  R. Glaser,et al.  Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment , 2001 .

[26]  Wim J. van der Linden,et al.  Empirical Initialization of the Trait Estimator in Adaptive Testing , 1999 .