Building Facade Study in Lahijan City, Iran: The Impact of Facade's Visual Elements on Historical Image

Buildings are considered as significant part in the cities, which plays main role in organization and arrangement of city appearance, which is affects image of that building facades, as an connective between inner and outer space, have a main role in city image and they are classified as rich image and poor image by people evaluation which related to visual architectural and urban elements in building facades. the buildings in Karimi street , in Lahijan city where, lies in north of Iran, contain the variety of building's facade types which, have made a city image in Historical part of Lahijan city, while reflected the Iranian cities identity. The study attempt to identify the architectural and urban elements that impression the image of building facades in historical area, based on public evaluation. Quantitative method were used and the data was collected through questionnaire survey, the result presented architectural style, color, shape, and design evaluated by people as most important factor which should be understate in future development. in fact, the rich architectural style with strong design make strong city image as weak design make poor city image. Keywords—Building’s facade, historical area.

[1]  J. F. Coeterier,et al.  Lay people’s evaluation of historic sites , 2002 .

[2]  Louis Swirnoff,et al.  The visual environment: Consider the surface , 1982 .

[3]  Ebru Çubukçu,et al.  Hue, saturation, lightness, and building exterior preference: An empirical study in Turkey comparing architects' and nonarchitects' evaluative and cognitive judgments , 2008 .

[4]  D. Walmsley,et al.  Evaluative Images and Tourism: The Use of Personal Constructs to Describe the Structure of Destination Images , 1998 .

[5]  Ronald B. Heady,et al.  Swift: A Software Program for the Analysis of Written Comments , 1996 .

[6]  Nancy L Kondracki,et al.  Content analysis: review of methods and their applications in nutrition education. , 2002, Journal of nutrition education and behavior.

[7]  J. C. Moughtin,et al.  Urban Design: Ornament and Decoration , 1995 .

[8]  Robert Gifford,et al.  ARCHITECTS PREDICT LAY EVALUATIONS OF LARGE CONTEMPORARY BUILDINGS: WHOSE CONCEPTUAL PROPERTIES? , 2001 .

[9]  J. Nasar,et al.  The beauty and the beast: Some preliminary comparisons of ‘high’ versus ‘popular’ residential architecture and public versus architect judgments of same , 1989 .

[10]  D. Berlyne Studies in the New Experimental Aesthetics: Steps Toward an Objective Psychology of Aesthetic Appreciation, , 1974 .

[11]  Apichoke Lekagul Toward Preservation of the Traditional Marketplace: A Preference Study of Traditional and Modern Shopping Environments in Bangkok, Thailand , 2010 .

[12]  A. Askari Public Evaluation Of Historical Building Facades In The Vicinity Of Dataran Merdeka, Kuala Lumpur , 2009 .

[13]  J. Russell,et al.  A Description of the Affective Quality Attributed to Environments , 1980 .

[14]  Tawfiq M. Abu-Ghazzeh Signs, advertising and the imageability of buildings: A perceptual selection in the view from the street in Amman, Jordan , 1997 .

[15]  R. Kaplan Employees’ reactions to nearby nature at their workplace: The wild and the tame , 2007 .

[16]  Çağrı Imamoğlu,et al.  Complexity, liking and familiarity : Architecture and non-architecture Turkish students' assessments of traditional and modern house facades , 2000 .

[17]  S. Michael With people in mind: Design and management of everyday nature , 1999 .

[18]  Kemal Yıldırım,et al.  Architecture and engineering students' evaluations of house façades: Preference, complexity and impressiveness , 2009 .

[19]  Dori Beth Frewald Preferences for Older Buildings: A Psychological Approach to Architectural Design , 1989 .

[20]  Peter M. Chisnall,et al.  Questionnaire Design, Interviewing and Attitude Measurement , 1993 .

[21]  Josefa D. Martín,et al.  Factors influencing destination image , 2004 .

[22]  J. Russell,et al.  An approach to environmental psychology , 1974 .