A comparison of the whole-body and segmental methodologies of bioimpedance analysis

Abstract.Theory supports the use of a segmental methodology (SM) for bioimpedance analysis (BIA) of body water (BW). However, previous studies have generally failed to show a significant improvement when the SM is used in place of a whole-body methodology. A pilot study was conducted to compare the two methodologies in control and overweight subjects. BW of each subject was measured by D2O dilution and also estimated from BIA measurements. Bland and Altman analysis was used to compare the two values of BW. The SM resulted in a small but not significantly improved “limits of agreement” of measured and BIA estimated BW (p~0.3). This and the results of previous studies suggest that improvements in prediction of BW obtained from application of the SM may be intrinsically small and may not justify the additional effort in application.

[1]  L. Ward,et al.  Comparison of Whole Body and Segmental Bioimpedance Methodologies for Estimating Total Body Water , 2000, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[2]  L C Ward,et al.  A comparison of segmental and wrist-to-ankle methodologies of bioimpedance analysis. , 1998, Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine.

[3]  L. Baur,et al.  Determination of total body water by Fourier transform infrared analysis. , 1990, Australasian physical & engineering sciences in medicine.

[4]  L. Ward,et al.  The Effect of Electrode Placement in Measuring Ipsilateral/Contralateral Segmental Bioelectrical Impedance , 2000, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[5]  G B Bradham,et al.  Segmental bioelectrical impedance analysis: theory and application of a new technique. , 1994, Journal of applied physiology.

[6]  H C Lukaski,et al.  Assessment of fat-free mass using bioelectrical impedance measurements of the human body. , 1985, The American journal of clinical nutrition.