Contribution of the Living Lab approach to the development, assessment and provision of assistive technologies for supporting older adults with cognitive disorders

Many technology-based products and services have proven to be successful in supporting older adults with cognitive disorders in regard to health and social care, safety, and independent living. However, several barriers to effective design, assessment and provision of assistive technologies in this context have been identified over the last years (e.g., technology acceptance and usability issues, methodological limitations in the assessment process, difficulties to balance the interests of different stakeholders, fragmentation in the field, lack of appropriate models for including assistive technology in global care plans). These barriers are associated either to micro-level factors, pertaining to the individual user, or to macro-level factors, related to a variety of stakeholders and the socio-economic, organizational and infrastructural characStudia Informatica Universalis. Contribution of the Living Lab approach... 35 teristics of the ecosystem. This paper discusses how Living Labs in the sector of healthcare, by promoting user-centered approaches, open-innovation, multi-stakeholder alliances and real-life experimentations, offer the infrastructure, knowledge, services and flexibility to address these issues. After summarizing main barriers to the use of assistive technology by older adults with cognitive disorders, we provide a general description the Living Lab concept and some examples of related national and regional initiatives. Then, we present LUSAGE, a French Living Lab engaged in the design, assessment and deployment of assistive technology solutions for older adults with cognitive impairment, such as Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias. LUSAGE’s scope and activities are described in terms of the identification of micro and macro level factors that influence AT development, assessment and provision in this context. Finally, we suggest some promising directions for further development of Living Labs in the field of aging and independent living.

[1]  A.-S. Rigaud,et al.  Le laboratoire LUSAGE : un exemple de Living Lab dans le domaine des gérontechnologies , 2012 .

[2]  Daniele Sancarlo,et al.  Information and communication technology systems to improve quality of life and safety of Alzheimer's disease patients: a multicenter international survey. , 2011, Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD.

[3]  Phillip Vaughan,et al.  Cognitive Prostheses: Findings from Attempts to Model Some Aspects of Cognition , 2011, HCI.

[4]  N. Charness,et al.  Aging and Information Technology Use , 2009 .

[5]  Stefano Federici,et al.  ICF Core Set for Matching Older Adults with Dementia and Technology , 2012 .

[6]  Maribel Pino,et al.  [Support for patients with Alzheimer's disease and their caregivers by gerontechnology]. , 2011, Geriatrie et psychologie neuropsychiatrie du vieillissement.

[7]  Panos Markopoulos,et al.  LivingLab : a white paper , 2000 .

[8]  Anna Ståhlbröst,et al.  Concept Design with a Living Lab Approach , 2009 .

[9]  Martina Ziefle,et al.  Smart Home Technologies: Insights into Generation-Specific Acceptance Motives , 2009, USAB.

[10]  C. McCreadie,et al.  The acceptability of assistive technology to older people , 2005, Ageing and Society.

[11]  Mika Westerlund,et al.  Editorial: Living Labs , 2012, Technology Innovation Management Review.

[12]  Ian Robinson,et al.  Benefits of and barriers to involving users in medical device technology development and evaluation , 2007, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[13]  James G. Anderson,et al.  Social, ethical and legal barriers to E-health , 2007, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[14]  Charlotte Löfqvist,et al.  The use of assistive technology in different age-groups of old people , 2013 .

[15]  McKay Moore Sohlberg Assistive Technology for Cognition , 2011 .

[16]  S Holm,et al.  Assistive technology, telecare and people with intellectual disabilities: ethical considerations , 2009, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[17]  Hans Schaffers,et al.  Living labs for cross-border systemic innovation , 2012 .

[18]  P. Olivier,et al.  Keeping In Touch Everyday (KITE) project: developing assistive technologies with people with dementia and their carers to promote independence , 2009, International Psychogeriatrics.

[19]  Arthur D. Fisk,et al.  Designing for Older Adults: Principles and Creative Human Factors Approaches , 2004 .

[20]  Antoine Piau,et al.  Aging society and gerontechnology: A solution for an independent living? , 2013, The journal of nutrition, health & aging.

[21]  Vicki A Freedman,et al.  Reconsidering substitution in long-term care: when does assistive technology take the place of personal care? , 2005, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[22]  G. Hartvigsen,et al.  Current status and future perspectives in telecare for elderly people suffering from chronic diseases , 2008, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[23]  Marine Agogué,et al.  Managing innovative design within the health ecosystem : the Living Lab as an architect of the unknown , 2013 .

[24]  Pierre Jouvelot,et al.  A pilot usability study of MINWii, a music therapy game for demented patients. , 2011, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[25]  Johnson,et al.  On Modelling Assistive Technology Systems , 2006 .

[26]  Anna Ståhlbröst,et al.  A milieu for innovation : defining living labs , 2009 .

[27]  W. Preiser,et al.  Universal design handbook , 2001 .