Applied Mathematics in the Sciences

A complete philosophy of mathematics must address Paul Benacerraf’s dilemma. The requirements of a general semantics for the truth of mathematical theorems that coheres also with the meaning and truth conditions for non-mathematical sentences, according to Benacerraf, should ideally be coupled with an adequate epistemology for the discovery of mathematical knowledge. Standard approaches to the philosophy of mathematics are criticized against their own merits and against the background of Benacerraf’s dilemma, particularly with respect to the problem of understanding the distinction between pure and applied mathematics and the effectiveness of applied mathematics in the natural sciences and engineering. The evaluation of these alternatives provides the basis for articulating a philosophically advantageous Aristotelian inherence concept of mathematical entities. An inherence account solves Benacerraf’s dilemma by interpreting mathematical entities as nominalizations of structural spatiotemporal properties inhering in existent spatiotemporal entities.

[1]  Armand A. Maurer.  The Philosophy of William of Ockham in the Light of its Principles , 1999 .

[2]  E. N. Lee.  On the Metaphysics of the Image in Plato's Timaeus , 1966 .

[3]  L. Brouwer,et al.  Intuitionism and formalism , 1913 .

[4]  P. Simons,et al.  Reviews-The Applicability of Mathematics as a Philosophical Problem , 1998 .

[5]  Alexander Nehamas.  Participation and Predication in Plato's Later Thought , 1982 .

[6]  Hartry Field.  On Conservativeness and Incompleteness , 1985 .

[7]  Hilary Putnam,et al.  Mathematics without Foundations , 1967 .

[8]  P. Maddy.  Naturalism in mathematics , 1997 .

[9]  J. Mill.  A system of logic, ratiocinative and inductive : being a connected view of the principles of evidence, and the methods of scientific investigation. , 2011 .

[10]  Penelope Maddy,et al.  Realism in mathematics , 1991 .

[11]  Hartry Field,et al.  Science without Numbers , 1983 .

[12]  A. Heyting,et al.  Intuitionism: An introduction , 1956 .

[13]  C. Chihara.  A Structural Account of Mathematics , 2004 .

[14]  Jody Azzouni,et al.  Metaphysical Myths, Mathematical Practice: Acknowledgments , 1994 .

[15]  M. Resnik.  Mathematics as a Science of Patterns: Ontology and Reference in Philosophy of Mathematics. , 1981 .

[16]  D. Hilbert.  Die grundlagen der mathematik , 1928 .

[17]  D. Hilbert.  Über das Unendliche , 1926 .

[18]  M. Leng,et al.  Platonism and Anti-Platonism in Mathematics , 2001 .

[19]  Hartry Field,et al.  Realism, Mathematics, and Modality , 1989 .

[20]  P. Maddy.  Perception and mathematical intuition , 1980 .

[21]  Philotheus Böhner.  The Realistic Conceptualism of William Ockham , 1946, Traditio.

[22]  S. Shapiro.  Philosophy of mathematics : structure and ontology , 1997 .

[23]  Paul Benacerraf,et al.  Philosophy of mathematics: What numbers could not be , 1965 .

[24]  Michael D. Resnik,et al.  Mathematics as a science of patterns , 1997 .

[25]  Hartry Field.  A nominalistic proof of the conservativeness of set theory , 1992, J. Philos. Log..