Bridging planning and execution: Temporal planning of syllables

This study compares the time to initiate words with varying syllable structures (V, VC, CV, CVC, CCV, CCVC). In order to test the hypothesis that different syllable structures require different amounts of time to prepare their temporal controls, or plans, two delayed naming experiments were carried out. In the first of these the initiation time was determined from acoustic recordings. The results confirmed the hypothesis but also showed an interaction with the initial segment (i.e., vowel-initial words were initiated later than words beginning with consonants, but this difference was much smaller for words starting stops compared to /l/ or /s/). Adding a coda did not affect the initiation time. In order to rule out effects of segment-specific articulatory to acoustic interval differences, a second experiment was performed in which speech movements of the tongue, the jaw and the lips were recorded by means of electromagnetic articulography. Results from initiation time, based on articulatory measurements, showed a significant syllable structure effect with VC words being initiated significantly later than CV(C) words. Only minor effects of the initial segment were found. These results can be partly explained by the amount of accumulated experience a speaker has in coordinating the relevant gesture combinations and triggering them appropriately in time.

[1]  Vsevolod Kapatsinski,et al.  Frequency of Use Leads to Automaticity of Production: Evidence from Repair in Conversation , 2010, Language and speech.

[2]  Rebecca Treiman,et al.  Phonetic Biases in Voice Key Response Time Measurements , 2002 .

[3]  Stephen Monsell,et al.  The Latency and Duration of Rapid Movement Sequences: Comparisons of Speech and Typewriting , 1978 .

[4]  P. Perrier,et al.  What role does the palate play in speech motor control? Insights from tongue kinematics for German alveolar obstruents , 2003 .

[5]  Andrew Butcher,et al.  VC vs. CV syllables: a comparison of Aboriginal languages with English , 2004, Journal of the International Phonetic Association.

[6]  Christine Mooshammer,et al.  for Loops , 2020, Bite‐Size Python®.

[7]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Synchronization - A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences , 2001, Cambridge Nonlinear Science Series.

[8]  Keith Johnson,et al.  The Role of Speech Perception in Phonology , 2001 .

[9]  Abigail C. Cohn THE STATUS OF NASALIZED CONTINUANTS , 1993 .

[10]  Louis Goldstein,et al.  Gestural specification using dynamically-defined articulatory structures , 1990 .

[11]  Tamiko Azuma,et al.  Open wide and say blah! attentional dynamics of delayed naming , 1997 .

[12]  M H Cohen,et al.  Electromagnetic midsagittal articulometer systems for transducing speech articulatory movements. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Fredericka Bell‐Berti,et al.  A Temporal Model of Speech Production , 1980, Phonetica.

[14]  K J de Jong,et al.  The correlation of P-center adjustments with articulatory and acoustic events. , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Effects of baseword frequency and orthographic neighborhood size in pseudohomophone naming , 2000 .

[16]  W. Levelt,et al.  Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary? , 1994, Cognition.

[17]  W. Levelt,et al.  Word frequency effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form , 1994 .

[18]  D. Byrd C-Centers Revisited , 1995 .

[19]  F H Guenther,et al.  Speech sound acquisition, coarticulation, and rate effects in a neural network model of speech production. , 1995, Psychological review.

[20]  Khalil Iskarous,et al.  Articulatory-acoustic kinematics: the production of American English /s/. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  E. Saltzman,et al.  COUPLED OSCILLATOR PLANNING MODEL OF SPEECH TIMING AND SYLLABLE STRUCTURE , 2008 .

[22]  Dani Byrd,et al.  Action to Language via the Mirror Neuron System: The role of vocal tract gestural action units in understanding the evolution of phonology , 2006 .

[23]  Janet B. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast , 2000 .

[24]  Derek Besner,et al.  Neighborhood effects in reading aloud: new findings and new challenges for computational models. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  G. Dell,et al.  Stages of lexical access in language production , 1992, Cognition.

[26]  Louis Goldstein,et al.  Articulatory gestures as phonological units , 1989, Phonology.

[27]  W. Levelt Accessing words in speech production: Stages, processes and representations , 1992, Cognition.

[28]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  Effects of syllable frequency in speech production , 2006, Cognition.

[29]  R. Krakow NONSEGMENTAL INFLUENCES ON VELUM MOVEMENT PATTERNS: SYLLABLES, SENTENCES, STRESS, AND SPEAKING RATE , 1993 .

[30]  Elizabeth C. Zsiga Phonology and Phonetic Evidence: An acoustic and electropalatographic study of lexical and postlexical palatalization in American English , 1995 .

[31]  Louis Goldstein,et al.  A task-dynamic toolkit for modeling the effects of prosodic structure on articulation , 2008, Speech Prosody 2008.

[32]  Stephen Monsell,et al.  Motor Programs and Hierarchical Organization in the Control of Rapid Speech , 1988 .

[33]  Daniel Bullock,et al.  Neural Representations and Mechanisms for the Performance of Simple Speech Sequences , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[34]  Vsevolod Kapatsinski,et al.  Sound Similarity Relations in the Mental Lexicon: Modeling the Lexicon as a Complex Network 1 , 2005 .

[35]  Carol A. Fowler,et al.  Coarticulation and theories of extrinsic timing , 1980 .

[36]  A Wingfield,et al.  Response Latencies in Naming Objects , 1965, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[37]  J. Pierrehumbert Phonetic Diversity, Statistical Learning, and Acquisition of Phonology , 2003, Language and speech.

[38]  L Saltzman Elliot,et al.  A Dynamical Approach to Gestural Patterning in Speech Production , 1989 .

[39]  Carol A. Fowler,et al.  “Perceptual centers” in speech production and perception , 1979 .

[40]  Janet Pierrehumbert,et al.  Gesture, Segment, Prosody: Lenition of |h| and glottal stop , 1992 .

[41]  Bernd Pompino-Marschall,et al.  On the Psychoacoustic Nature of the P-Center Phenomenon , 1989 .

[42]  S. Palethorpe,et al.  Proceedings of the Sixth International Seminar on Speech Production , 2003 .

[43]  Stephen Monsell,et al.  Frequency effects in lexical tasks: Reply to Balota and Chumbley. , 1990 .

[44]  Michael S Vitevitch,et al.  The influence of phonological similarity neighborhoods on speech production. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[45]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models , 2006 .

[46]  F. Huddle Coordination , 1966, Open Knowledge Institutions.

[47]  S. M. Marcus Acoustic determinants of perceptual center (P-center) location , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[48]  M. Vitevitch,et al.  Sublexical and lexical representations in speech production: effects of phonotactic probability and onset density. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[49]  O. Fujimura Temporal Organization of Articulatory Movements as a Multidimensional Phrasal Structure , 1981, Phonetica.

[50]  Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel,et al.  Glottalization of word-initial vowels as a function of prosodic structure , 1996 .

[51]  M. Pouplier,et al.  Temporal organization of complex onsets and codas in American English: testing the predictions of a gestural coupling model. , 2010, Motor control.

[52]  Martine Grice,et al.  Articulatory Indicators of Syllable Affiliation in Word Initial Consonant Clusters in Italian , 2008 .

[53]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[54]  Vsevolod Kapatsinski,et al.  Conversation Frequency of Use Leads to Automaticity of Production: Evidence from Repair in , 2010 .

[55]  Shrikanth S. Narayanan,et al.  Timing effects of syllable structure and stress on nasals: A real-time MRI examination , 2009, J. Phonetics.

[56]  P. Hoole,et al.  Gestural overlap and C-center in selected French consonant clusters , 2006 .

[57]  Wolfram Ziegler,et al.  Do we have a "mental syllabary" in the brain? An FMRI study. , 2011, Motor control.

[58]  Alan H. Kawamoto,et al.  Articulatory preparation in the delayed naming task , 2008 .

[59]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Characterizing the motor execution stage of speech production: consonantal effects on delayed naming latency and onset duration. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[60]  S. Blumstein,et al.  Cascading activation from phonological planning to articulatory processes: Evidence from tongue twisters , 2006 .

[61]  Rudi C. Villing,et al.  Measuring perceptual centers using the phase correction response , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[62]  John Kingston,et al.  Between the grammar and physics of speech , 1994 .

[63]  R. H. Baayen,et al.  The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM) , 1996 .

[64]  Susanne Fuchs,et al.  Stress distinction in German: simulating kinematic parameters of tongue-tip gestures , 2002, J. Phonetics.

[65]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  An Evaluation of the Two-Cycles Model of Phonology Assembly☆☆☆ , 2000 .

[66]  C. Browman,et al.  Papers in Laboratory Phonology: Tiers in articulatory phonology, with some implications for casual speech , 1990 .

[67]  John J. McCarthy,et al.  A Case of Surface Constraint Violation , 1993, Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique.

[68]  P. Smolensky,et al.  Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar , 2004 .

[69]  Philip Hoole,et al.  Interarticulator cohesion within coronal consonant productiona ) , 2006 .

[70]  Michael S Vitevitch,et al.  A Web-based interface to calculate phonotactic probability for words and nonwords in English , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[71]  Adamantios I. Gafos,et al.  Syllabification in Moroccan Arabic: evidence from patterns of temporal stability in articulation* , 2009, Phonology.

[72]  Dani Byrd,et al.  Dynamic action units slip in speech production errors , 2007, Cognition.

[73]  Elisabeth Dévière,et al.  Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R , 2009 .

[74]  Louis Goldsteina,et al.  SYLLABLE STRUCTURE AS COUPLED OSCILLATOR MODES : EVIDENCE FROM GEORGIAN VS . TASHLHIYT BERBER , 2007 .

[75]  Rachid Ridouane,et al.  Kinematics of syllable structure in Tashlhiyt Berber: The case of vocalic and consonantal nuclei. , 2011 .

[76]  H. Haken,et al.  A theoretical model of phase transitions in human hand movements , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[77]  D. Bates,et al.  Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS , 2001 .

[78]  Christo Kirov,et al.  A dynamical model of change in phonological representations: The case of lenition , 2009 .

[79]  No Value Proceedings of the 14th international congress of phonetic sciences , 2000 .

[80]  J. Perkell Physiology of speech production: results and implications of a quantitative cineradiographic study , 1969 .

[81]  Man Gao Högskolan Tonal Alignment in Mandarin Chinese : An Articulatory Phonology Account , 2013 .

[82]  Dani Byrd,et al.  Task-dynamics of gestural timing: Phase windows and multifrequency rhythms , 2000 .

[83]  G. Clements Papers in Laboratory Phonology: The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification , 1990 .

[84]  Louis Goldstein,et al.  Towards an articulatory phonology , 1986, Phonology.

[85]  Christopher T. Kello,et al.  Effect of onset cluster complexity in speeded naming: A test of rule-based approaches. , 1999 .

[86]  D. Steriade Directional asymmetries in place assimilation: a perceptual account , 2001 .

[87]  C. Browman,et al.  Some Notes on Syllable Structure in Articulatory Phonology , 1988, Phonetica.

[88]  J. Ohala,et al.  Speech perception is hearing sounds, not tongues. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[89]  Anders Löfqvist,et al.  Control of oral closure in lingual stop consonant production. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[90]  Dani Byrd,et al.  Saying consonant clusters quickly , 1996 .

[91]  G S Dell,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. , 1986, Psychological review.

[92]  Gordon D. A. Brown,et al.  Serial Control of Phonology in Speech Production: A Hierarchical Model , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[93]  Trevor A. Harley,et al.  Phonological activation of semantic competitors during lexical access in speech production , 1993 .

[94]  C. Browman,et al.  Competing constraints on intergestural coordination and self-organization of phonological structures , 2000 .