Life motion signals lengthen perceived temporal duration

Point-light biological motions, conveying various different attributes of biological entities, have particular spatiotemporal properties that enable them to be processed with remarkable efficiency in the human visual system. Here we demonstrate that such signals automatically lengthen their perceived temporal duration independent of global configuration and without observers’ subjective awareness of their biological nature. By using a duration discrimination paradigm, we showed that an upright biological motion sequence was perceived significantly longer than an inverted but otherwise identical sequence of the same duration. Furthermore, this temporal dilation effect could be extended to spatially scrambled biological motion signals, whose global configurations were completely disrupted, regardless of whether observers were aware of the nature of the stimuli. However, such an effect completely disappeared when critical biological characteristics were removed. Taken together, our findings suggest a special mechanism of time perception tuned to life motion signals and shed new light on the temporal encoding of biological motion.

[1]  Ryota Kanai,et al.  Time dilation in dynamic visual display. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[2]  N. Troje,et al.  The Inversion Effect in Biological Motion Perception: Evidence for a “Life Detector”? , 2006, Current Biology.

[3]  Sheng He,et al.  Larger stimuli are judged to last longer. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[4]  M. Shiffrar,et al.  The visual perception of human locomotion. , 1998, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[5]  A. Münchau,et al.  Observation of a finger or an object movement primes imitative responses differentially , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  Bartlett W. Mel,et al.  Combining Multiple Cues for Contour Detection: Lessons from (and to) the Visual Cortex , 2010 .

[7]  F. Simion,et al.  A predisposition for biological motion in the newborn baby , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  B. Bertenthal,et al.  Converging operations revisited: Assessing what infants perceive using discrimination measures , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The mirror-neuron system. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[10]  J. Decety,et al.  From the perception of action to the understanding of intention , 2001, Nature reviews. Neuroscience.

[11]  Bennett I. Bertenthal,et al.  Global Processing of Biological Motions , 1994 .

[12]  R. Blake,et al.  Perception of human motion. , 2007, Annual review of psychology.

[13]  Markus Lappe,et al.  Driving is smoother and more stable when using the tangent point. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[14]  Dorita H. F. Chang,et al.  Acceleration carries the local inversion effect in biological motion perception. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[15]  Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al.  Perceptual causality and animacy , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  J. Freyd,et al.  Timing and Apparent Motion Path Choice With Human Body Photographs , 1993 .

[17]  Dorita H. F. Chang,et al.  Perception of animacy and direction from local biological motion signals. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[18]  Mary Hayhoe,et al.  Gaze patterns in search reflect learnt environmental probabilities and rewards , 2010 .

[19]  Paul M Bays,et al.  Temporal dynamics of encoding, storage, and reallocation of visual working memory. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[20]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Gravity bias in the interpretation of biological motion by inexperienced chicks , 2006, Current Biology.

[21]  Karl Verfaillie,et al.  Perception of biological motion: A stimulus set of human point-light actions , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[22]  Alexander Münchau,et al.  Investigating the human mirror neuron system by means of cortical synchronization during the imitation of biological movements , 2006, NeuroImage.

[23]  G. Mather,et al.  Low-level visual processing of biological motion , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  J. Kawahara,et al.  The subjective size of visual stimuli affects the perceived duration of their presentation , 2007, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[26]  Daniel Jokisch,et al.  Biological motion as a cue for the perception of size. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[27]  Michael E Young,et al.  Stimulus dynamics and temporal discrimination: implications for pacemakers. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[28]  P. Tse,et al.  Attention and the subjective expansion of time , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Visually Inexperienced Chicks Exhibit Spontaneous Preference for Biological Motion Patterns , 2005, PLoS biology.

[30]  J. Wearden,et al.  Stimulus range effects in temporal bisection by humans. , 1996, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[31]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  Tempo rubato: Animacy speeds up time in the brain , 2011 .

[32]  P. Fraisse The psychology of time , 1963 .

[33]  R. Nichols,et al.  Prediction of the first year college performance of high aptitude students. , 1963, Psychological monographs.

[34]  J. Lange,et al.  A Model of Biological Motion Perception from Configural Form Cues , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  Scott W. Brown Time, change, and motion: The effects of stimulus movement on temporal perception , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[36]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Sex-specific norms code face identity. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[37]  G. Johansson Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[38]  Akihiro Yagi,et al.  Reduction of stimulus visibility compresses apparent time intervals , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[39]  S. Goldstone,et al.  Movement and the judged duration of visual targets , 1975 .

[40]  M. Ernst,et al.  The statistical determinants of adaptation rate in human reaching. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[41]  J. Todd,et al.  The effects of viewing angle, camera angle, and sign of surface curvature on the perception of three-dimensional shape from texture. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[42]  A. Schnitzler,et al.  Do simple intransitive finger movements consistently activate frontoparietal mirror neuron areas in humans? , 2007, NeuroImage.

[43]  J. Freyd,et al.  Apparent Motion of the Human Body , 1990 .

[44]  M. Treisman Temporal discrimination and the indifference interval. Implications for a model of the "internal clock". , 1963, Psychological monographs.

[45]  M. Pavlova,et al.  Orientation specificity in biological motion perception , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[46]  David M. Eagleman,et al.  Is Subjective Duration a Signature of Coding Efficiency , 2010 .

[47]  Ikuya Murakami,et al.  Perceived duration of visual motion increases with speed. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[48]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Activation in Posterior Superior Temporal Sulcus Parallels Parameter Inducing the Percept of Animacy , 2005, Neuron.

[49]  Sheng He,et al.  Searching for Life Motion Signals , 2010, Psychological science.

[50]  M. Lappe,et al.  Perception of biological motion from limited-lifetime stimuli , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[51]  R. Blake,et al.  Brain activity evoked by inverted and imagined biological motion , 2001, Vision Research.

[52]  K. Hiraki,et al.  The relative importance of spatial versus temporal structure in the perception of biological motion: An event-related potential study , 2006, Cognition.

[53]  Sheng He,et al.  Biological motion cues trigger reflexive attentional orienting , 2010, Cognition.

[54]  D. Spinelli,et al.  Crowding, reading, and developmental dyslexia. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[55]  W L Brigner,et al.  Effect of Perceived Brightness on Perceived Time , 1986, Perceptual and motor skills.

[56]  Lara Bardi,et al.  Biological motion preference in humans at birth: role of dynamic and configural properties. , 2011, Developmental science.

[57]  Eric Hiris,et al.  Temporal properties in masking biological motion , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[58]  F. Pollick,et al.  Exaggerating Temporal Differences Enhances Recognition of Individuals from Point Light Displays , 2000, Psychological science.

[59]  Alexander Münchau,et al.  Right hemisphere contributions to imitation tasks , 2008, The European journal of neuroscience.

[60]  Shinsuke Shimojo,et al.  Distortions of Subjective Time Perception Within and Across Senses , 2008, PloS one.

[61]  M. Landy,et al.  The effect of viewpoint on perceived visual roughness. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[62]  L. Rüschendorf,et al.  On the Perception of Time , 2009, Gerontology.

[63]  J. Wearden,et al.  Stimulus Range Effects in Temporal Bisection by Humans , 1996, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[64]  J A Beintema,et al.  Perception of biological motion without local image motion , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[65]  S. Sumi Upside-down Presentation of the Johansson Moving Light-Spot Pattern , 1984, Perception.

[66]  J. Lange,et al.  Visual perception of biological motion by form: a template-matching analysis. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[67]  Nikolaus F Troje,et al.  Allocation of attention to biological motion: local motion dominates global shape. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[68]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.