Fatigue level detection using multivariate autoregressive exogenous nonlinear modeling based on driver body pressure distribution

Prolonged driving causes symptoms of fatigue in drivers and changes their physical condition during driving. The purpose of this paper is to use a force measurement system located in the driver’s seat by force-sensitive resistance pressure sensors in order to record the received information to predict fatigue by learning regression-based models. This system is designed with 16 FSR (Force Sensing Resistor) sensors mounted on the seat and its backrest that records the driver’s body’s data, based on the force exerted by the driver on the seat in standard mode and during driving at various times. Fatigue level prediction is based on the trained nonlinear autoregressive exogenous model. In this procedure, models based on multivariate regression are first trained, and then correctness is checked. In this paper, the fatigue index is divided into five parts from 0 to 100 included fully conscious, slightly tired, moderately tired, very tired, and extremely tired, so the criterion for diagnosis is crossing the 75% of fatigue index and entering the extremely tired range. The results show that nonlinear models based on exogenous autoregressive have better performance than the linear mode, and even in the nonlinear model of NARX neural network, the fatigue of one step ahead is well predictable. A flopped state will be predictable when the body is immersed in the seat due to fatigue, so is far from the standard sitting position and will be in the extremely tired warning range.

[1]  David J. Cole,et al.  Application of linear preview control to modelling human steering control , 2009 .

[2]  R. Zdero,et al.  The effect of load application rate on the biomechanics of synthetic femurs , 2010, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[3]  A. H. Mazinan,et al.  Real-time high-resolution detection approach considering eyes and its states in video frames through intelligence-based representation , 2016 .

[4]  Vittore Cossalter,et al.  The response of the rider’s body to roll oscillations of two wheeled vehicles; experimental tests and biomechanical models , 2013 .

[5]  Alireza Khodayari,et al.  A predictive model of discretionary lane change behavior considering human factors in the framework of time parameters , 2020 .

[6]  Li Ning Sun,et al.  Design, identification, and control of piezoactuated positioning mechanism based on adaptive inverse method , 2008 .

[7]  Zhenlong Li,et al.  Performance analysis of K-nearest neighbor, support vector machine, and artificial neural network classifiers for driver drowsiness detection with different road geometries , 2017, Int. J. Distributed Sens. Networks.

[8]  Klaus Bengler,et al.  Drowsiness in Conditional Automation: Proneness, diagnosis and driving performance effects , 2016, 2016 IEEE 19th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[9]  Azhar Quddus,et al.  Non-Intrusive Detection of Drowsy Driving Based on Eye Tracking Data , 2019, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

[10]  Pascal Madeleine,et al.  The variability and complexity of sitting postural control are associated with discomfort. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  Paul I. Ro,et al.  Reduced-order modelling and parameter estimation for a quarter-car suspension system , 2000 .

[12]  C. Diels,et al.  Model to predict motion sickness within autonomous vehicles , 2020, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering.

[13]  Azim Eskandarian,et al.  Unobtrusive drowsiness detection by neural network learning of driver steering , 2001 .

[14]  W W Wierwille,et al.  Evaluation of driver drowsiness by trained raters. , 1994, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  Denis P. Wood,et al.  Vehicle-pedestrian collisions: Validated models for pedestrian impact and projection , 2005 .

[16]  Zvonko Sajfert,et al.  Anthropometrical limitations in the construction of passenger vehicles: Case study , 2008 .

[17]  Noah J. Goodall,et al.  Ethical Decision Making during Automated Vehicle Crashes , 2014, ArXiv.

[18]  Adeel Ahmad,et al.  Vital signs monitoring of multiple people using a FMCW millimeter-wave sensor , 2018, 2018 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf18).

[19]  Dušan Mladenović,et al.  Braking torque control using recurrent neural networks , 2012 .

[20]  David J. Cole,et al.  Dynamic properties of a driver's arms holding a steering wheel , 2007 .

[21]  Klaus Bengler,et al.  How the Duration of Automated Driving Influences Take-Over Performance and Gaze Behavior , 2017 .

[22]  Ding-Yu Fei,et al.  Accelerometer-based steering-wheel movement monitoring for drowsy-driving detection , 2015 .

[23]  T. Åkerstedt,et al.  Asleep at the Wheel-The Road to Addressing Drowsy Driving. , 2017, Sleep.

[24]  Liang Li,et al.  Non-Contact Driver Respiration Rate Detection Technology Based on Suppression of Multipath Interference with Directional Antenna , 2020, Inf..

[25]  Abdelkader Chaari,et al.  Parameter estimation of nonlinear systems using a robust possibilistic c-regression model algorithm , 2020, J. Syst. Control. Eng..

[26]  Memis Acar,et al.  Multi-sensor driver drowsiness monitoring , 2008 .

[27]  Robert M. Parkin,et al.  Driver tracking and posture detection using low-resolution infrared sensing , 2007 .

[28]  Dingli Yu,et al.  On-line control for optimal ignition timing using the pseudolinear radial basis function and the local linear model tree , 2005 .

[29]  Olfa Jemai,et al.  Towards a Smart Car Seat Design for Drowsiness Detection Based on Pressure Distribution of the Driver’s Body , 2016, ICSEA 2016.