Effects of Acoustic Variability in the Perceptual Learning of Non-Native-Accented Speech Sounds

This study addressed whether acoustic variability and category overlap in non-native speech contribute to difficulty in its recognition, and more generally whether the benefits of exposure to acoustic variability during categorization training are stable across differences in category confusability. Three experiments considered a set of Spanish-accented English productions. The set was seen to pose learning and recognition difficulty (experiment 1) and was more variable and confusable than a parallel set of native productions (experiment 2). A training study (experiment 3) probed the relative contributions of category central tendency and variability to difficulty in vowel identification using derived inventories in which these dimensions were manipulated based on the results of experiments 1 and 2. Training and test difficulty related straightforwardly to category confusability but not to location in the vowel space. Benefits of high-variability exposure also varied across vowel categories, and seemed to be diminished for highly confusable vowels. Overall, variability was implicated in perception and learning difficulty in ways that warrant further investigation.

[1]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Speech Perception as a Talker-Contingent Process , 1993, Psychological science.

[2]  J. Hirsch,et al.  fMRI Evidence for Cortical Modification during Learning of Mandarin Lexical Tone , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  A. Jongman,et al.  Acoustic and perceptual evaluation of Mandarin tone productions before and after perceptual training. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  R. Nosofsky Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[5]  D. Pisoni Research on Spoken Language Processing. Progress Report No. 21 (1996-1997). , 1997 .

[6]  Mark Schneider,et al.  Racial Segregation and Racial Change in American Suburbs, 1970-1980 , 1984, American Journal of Sociology.

[7]  S. Goldinger Words and voices: episodic traces in spoken word identification and recognition memory. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[8]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: a first report. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  D B Pisoni,et al.  Stimulus variability and processing dependencies in speech perception , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  W. Strange Speech perception and linguistic experience : issues in cross-language research , 1995 .

[11]  D. Broadbent,et al.  Information Conveyed by Vowels , 1957 .

[12]  A. Jongman,et al.  Dichotic Perception of Mandarin Tones by Chinese and American Listeners , 2001, Brain and Language.

[13]  J. P. Egan Articulation testing methods , 1948, The Laryngoscope.

[14]  S. Goldinger Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. , 1998, Psychological review.

[15]  Shawn A. Weil,et al.  Foreign accented speech: Encoding and generalization , 2001 .

[16]  A. Jongman,et al.  Acoustic variability and perceptual learning , 2006 .

[17]  J. Mullennix,et al.  Some effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  J. Mullennix,et al.  Effects of talker variability on recall of spoken word lists. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[19]  J. D. Miller,et al.  Auditory-perceptual interpretation of the vowel. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  C. Douglas Creelman,et al.  Case of the Unknown Talker , 1957 .

[21]  A. Jongman,et al.  Training American listeners to perceive Mandarin tones. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  James D. Miller Auditory‐perceptual interpretation of the vowel , 1987 .

[23]  Constance M. Clarke Perceptual adjustment to foreign‐accented English , 2000 .

[24]  P. Boersma ACCURATE SHORT-TERM ANALYSIS OF THE FUNDAMENTAL FREQUENCY AND THE HARMONICS-TO-NOISE RATIO OF A SAMPLED SOUND , 1993 .

[25]  S. Goldinger,et al.  On the nature of talker variability effects on recall of spoken word lists. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[26]  Dirk Van Compernolle Recognizing speech of goats, wolves, sheep and ... non-natives , 2001, Speech Commun..

[27]  J. Kingston Learning Foreign Vowels , 2003, Language and speech.

[28]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. III. Long-term retention of new phonetic categories. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  A. Bradlow,et al.  A comparative acoustic study of English and Spanish vowels. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  J. Hillenbrand,et al.  Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  R. Nosofsky,et al.  Typicality in logically defined categories: Exemplar-similarity versus rule instantiation , 1991, Memory & cognition.

[32]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  A. Bradlow Listener adaptation to foreig , 2003 .

[34]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: IV. Some effects of perceptual learning on speech production. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  Constance M. Clarke Perceptual adjustment to foreign-accented English with short term exposure , 2002, INTERSPEECH.

[36]  Dennis H. Klatt,et al.  Speech perception: a model of acoustic–phonetic analysis and lexical access , 1979 .

[37]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Talker-specific learning in speech perception , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.