Toward Project Complexity Evaluation: A Structural Perspective

Complexity is often quoted as an independent variable that challenges the utility of traditional project management tools and techniques. A large body of work has been devoted in exposing its numerous aspects, yet means for quantitatively assessing it have been scarce. Part of the challenge lies in the absence of hard evidence supporting the hypothesis that projects can be considered as complex systems, where techniques for measuring such complexity are better established. In response, this study uses empirical activity networks to account for the technological aspect of five projects. By doing so, the contribution of this study is twofold. First, a procedure for the quantitative assessment of an aspect of project complexity is presented; namely, structural complexity. Second, results of the analysis are used to highlight qualitatively similar behavior with a well-known complex system, the Internet. As such, it suggests a transition from the current, metaphorical view of projects being complex systems to a literal one.From a practical point of view, this study uses readily captured and widely used data, enabling practitioners to evaluate the structural complexity of their projects to explore system pathologies and, hence, improve the decision-making process around project bidding, resource allocation, and risk management.

[1]  Kwang-Il Goh,et al.  Burstiness and memory in complex systems , 2006 .

[2]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Statistical mechanics of complex networks , 2001, ArXiv.

[3]  Melanie Mitchell,et al.  Complex systems: Network thinking , 2006, Artif. Intell..

[4]  Shlomo Havlin,et al.  Long-term memory in earthquakes and the distribution of interoccurrence times , 2008 .

[5]  David Baccarini,et al.  The concept of project complexity—a review , 1996 .

[6]  Julien Pollack,et al.  Tools for Complex Projects , 2008 .

[7]  Ludovic-Alexandre Vidal,et al.  Understanding project complexity: implications on project management , 2008, Kybernetes.

[8]  Sally Floyd,et al.  Wide area traffic: the failure of Poisson modeling , 1995, TNET.

[9]  M. Newman Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law , 2005 .

[10]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  The origin of bursts and heavy tails in human dynamics , 2005, Nature.

[11]  Francesco Polese,et al.  A Brief Review of Systems Theories and Their Managerial Applications , 2010 .

[12]  Mario Vanhoucke An Overview of Recent Research Results and Future Research Avenues Using Simulation Studies in Project Management , 2013 .

[13]  Sönke Hartmann,et al.  A survey of variants and extensions of the resource-constrained project scheduling problem , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  J. Davidson Frame,et al.  The New Project Management: Tools for an Age of Rapid Change, Complexity, and Other Business Realities , 1994 .

[15]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data , 2007, SIAM Rev..

[16]  Aaron J. Shenhar,et al.  One Size Does Not Fit All Projects: Exploring Classical Contingency Domains , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[17]  M. Newman,et al.  Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[18]  M. Newman Complex Systems: A Survey , 2011, 1112.1440.

[19]  Prasanna Gai,et al.  Contagion in financial networks , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[20]  I. Kamwa,et al.  Causes of the 2003 major grid blackouts in North America and Europe, and recommended means to improve system dynamic performance , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[21]  Terry Williams,et al.  Modelling Complex Projects , 2001 .

[22]  Guanrong Chen,et al.  Complex networks: small-world, scale-free and beyond , 2003 .

[23]  Complex Project Management Global Perspectives and the Strategic Agenda to 2025 , 2011 .

[24]  Salah E. Elmaghraby,et al.  Activity nets: A guided tour through some recent developments , 1995 .

[25]  Salah E. Elmaghraby,et al.  On the measurement of complexity in activity networks , 1980 .

[26]  Yaneer Bar-Yam,et al.  Dynamics Of Complex Systems , 2019 .

[27]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Human dynamics: Darwin and Einstein correspondence patterns , 2005, Nature.

[28]  Yaneer Bar-Yam,et al.  When systems engineering fails-toward complex systems engineering , 2003, SMC'03 Conference Proceedings. 2003 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Conference Theme - System Security and Assurance (Cat. No.03CH37483).

[29]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[30]  Erik Demeulemeester,et al.  RanGen: A Random Network Generator for Activity-on-the-Node Networks , 2003, J. Sched..

[31]  Harvey Maylor,et al.  Now, let's make it really complex (complicated): A systematic review of the complexities of projects , 2011 .

[32]  Chi Guo,et al.  Analysis on the “Robust Yet Fragile” Nature of Internet: Load, Capacity and the Cascading Failure Avalanche Effect , 2008, 2008 The 9th International Conference for Young Computer Scientists.

[33]  Chris Fortune,et al.  BID/ NO-BID DECISION MODELLING FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS , 2006 .

[34]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Globally networked risks and how to respond , 2013, Nature.

[35]  Robert C. Leachman,et al.  A revised critical path method for networks including both overlap relationships and variable-duration activities , 1993 .

[36]  Neil A. Thacker,et al.  The Bhattacharyya metric as an absolute similarity measure for frequency coded data , 1998, Kybernetika.

[37]  Michael T. Pich,et al.  Managing project uncertainty: from variation to chaos , 2002, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[38]  Terry Williams,et al.  The Need for New Paradigms for Complex Projects , 1999 .

[39]  Svetlana. Cicmil,et al.  We're Not in Kansas Anymore, Toto: Mapping the Strange Landscape of Complexity Theory, and Its Relationship to Project Mangement , 2008 .

[40]  Mark Newman,et al.  Networks: An Introduction , 2010 .

[41]  Nicolas Chopin,et al.  Fast simulation of truncated Gaussian distributions , 2011, Stat. Comput..

[42]  Gérard P. Cachon,et al.  Perspective: Complexity Theory and Organization Science , 1999, Organization Science.

[43]  Michalis Faloutsos,et al.  On power-law relationships of the Internet topology , 1999, SIGCOMM '99.

[44]  Alessandro Vespignani Modelling dynamical processes in complex socio-technical systems , 2011, Nature Physics.

[45]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Universal features of correlated bursty behaviour , 2011, Scientific Reports.

[46]  Marc Barthelemy,et al.  Spatial Networks , 2010, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[47]  Jari Saramäki,et al.  Small But Slow World: How Network Topology and Burstiness Slow Down Spreading , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[48]  Christian Thuesen,et al.  Complexity Management for Projects, Programmes, and Portfolios: An Engineering Systems Perspective , 2015 .

[49]  Mazet Simulation d ’ une distribution gaussienne tronquée sur un intervalle fini , 2012 .

[50]  Luís Vladares Tavares A review of the contribution of Operational Research to Project Management , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[51]  Vicente Valls,et al.  Criticality Analysis in Activity-on-Node Networks with Minimal Time Lags , 2001 .

[52]  Michael Mitzenmacher,et al.  A Brief History of Generative Models for Power Law and Lognormal Distributions , 2004, Internet Math..

[53]  Salah E. Elmaghraby,et al.  On the fallacy of averages in project risk management , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[54]  M E J Newman Assortative mixing in networks. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[55]  W. Weaver Science and complexity. , 1948, American scientist.

[56]  V. Latora,et al.  Complex networks: Structure and dynamics , 2006 .

[57]  Christos Ellinas,et al.  How Robust Is Your Project? From Local Failures to Global Catastrophes: A Complex Networks Approach to Project Systemic Risk , 2015, PloS one.

[58]  Christopher S. Tang Robust strategies for mitigating supply chain disruptions , 2006 .

[59]  Massimo Marchiori,et al.  Error and attacktolerance of complex network s , 2004 .

[60]  Femke Reitsma,et al.  A Response to Simplifying Complexity , 2003 .

[61]  S. Strogatz Exploring complex networks , 2001, Nature.

[62]  Esteban Moro,et al.  Impact of human activity patterns on the dynamics of information diffusion. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[63]  Beom Jun Kim,et al.  Attack vulnerability of complex networks. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[64]  A.-L. Barabasi,et al.  The Architecture of Complexity , 2007, IEEE Control Systems.

[65]  Alexander M. Millkey The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable , 2009 .

[66]  D. Olson Supply Chain Risk Management: Tools for Analysis , 2011 .

[67]  Rodney Turner,et al.  A model of project complexity : distinguishing dimensions of complexity from severity , 2009 .

[68]  W. Ashby,et al.  Requisite Variety and Its Implications for the Control of Complex Systems , 1991 .

[69]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  The Structure and Function of Complex Networks , 2003, SIAM Rev..