Reusing qualitative video data: matching reuse goals and criteria for selection

This research investigated the reuse of Video Records of Practice (VRPs) – i.e. a type of qualitative data documenting teaching and learning in educational settings. It studied how reusers' purposes and experience-level with VRP reuse influence the importance of various VRP selection criteria and how these differ depending on whether the main goal for reuse was research or teaching. It also examined whether two different dimensions of qualitative research – reflexivity and context – were factors in VRP reuse.,The study reports on surveys of reusers at four VRP repositories. Questions were based on the literature and interviews with VRP reusers. The response rate was 20.6% (180 of 872 distributed surveys). This paper focused on 126 respondents who affirmatively responded they reused VRPs from a repository.,Researchers using VRPs were primarily interested in examining a broad range of processes in education and studying/improving ways to measure differences and growth in education. Reusers with teaching goals were commonly interested in VRPs to engage learners in showing examples/exemplars of – and reflecting on – teaching and learning. These differences between research and teaching led to varied expectations about VRPs, such as the amount of content needed and necessary contextual information to support reuse.,While repositories focus on exposing content, understanding and communicating certain qualities of that content can help reusers identify VRPs and align goals with selection decisions.,Although qualitative data are increasingly reused, research has rarely focused on identifying how qualitative data reusers employ selection criteria. This study focused on VRPs as one type of qualitative data and identified the attributes of VRPs that reusers perceived to be important during selection. These will help VRP repositories determine which metadata and documentation meet reusers' goals.

[1]  R. Flewitt Using video to investigate preschool classroom interaction: education research assumptions and methodological practices , 2006 .

[2]  Kalpana Shankar,et al.  Data sharing in the sciences , 2011, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[3]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Elizabeth Yakel,et al.  Context from the data reuser's point of view , 2019, J. Documentation.

[5]  Sebastian Karcher,et al.  Annotation for transparent inquiry: Transparent data and analysis for qualitative research , 2019, IASSIST Quarterly.

[6]  Jeremy P. Birnholtz,et al.  Data at work: supporting sharing in science and engineering , 2003, GROUP.

[7]  ChenYang,et al.  The National Institutes of Health's Biomedical Translational Research Information System (BTRIS) , 2014 .

[8]  Nick Mitchell,et al.  The role of video in teacher professional development , 2014 .

[9]  Pam Grossman,et al.  Learning to Look Beyond the Boundaries of Representation , 2009 .

[10]  Dharma Akmon,et al.  Restricting data’s use: A spectrum of concerns in need of flexible approaches , 2019 .

[11]  Gard Ove Sørvik,et al.  Reality Lost? Re-Use of Qualitative Data in Classroom Video Studies , 2013 .

[12]  Hong Huang,et al.  Domain knowledge and data quality perceptions in genome curation work , 2015, J. Documentation.

[13]  Jinfang Niu,et al.  Overcoming inadequate documentation , 2009, ASIST.

[14]  Ixchel M. Faniel,et al.  Reusing Scientific Data: How Earthquake Engineering Researchers Assess the Reusability of Colleagues’ Data , 2010, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[15]  Niamh Moore,et al.  The Contexts of Context: Broadening Perspectives in the (Re)Use of Qualitative Data , 2006 .

[16]  Ayoung Yoon,et al.  Data reusers' trust development , 2017, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[17]  Odette Parry,et al.  The Data are Out there, or are They? Implications for Archiving and Revisiting Qualitative Data , 1998 .

[18]  Carina Lansing,et al.  Capturing and supporting contexts for scientific data sharing via the biological sciences collaboratory , 2004, CSCW.

[19]  Roy D. Pea,et al.  Video-as-Data and Digital Video Manipulation Techniques for Transforming Learning Sciences Research, Education, and Other Cultural Practices , 2006 .

[20]  Sebastian Karcher,et al.  Beyond the matrix , 2016 .

[21]  Ayoung Yoon Visible Evidence of Invisible Quality Dimensions and the Role of Data Management , 2016 .

[22]  Rick O. Gilmore,et al.  Curating identifiable data for sharing: The databrary project , 2016, 2016 New York Scientific Data Summit (NYSDS).

[23]  Christopher S. G. Khoo,et al.  Social science research data curation: issues of reuse , 2017 .

[24]  Elizabeth Yakel,et al.  Examining the Reuse of Qualitative Research Data: Digital Video in Education , 2016 .

[25]  L. Major,et al.  Using video to support in-service teacher professional development: the state of the field, limitations and possibilities , 2017 .

[26]  Kittichai Rajchamaha,et al.  Profitability of Candlestick Charting Patterns in the Stock Exchange of Thailand , 2017 .

[27]  Kathleen Stürmer,et al.  Teacher learning from analysis of videotaped classroom situations: Does it make a difference whether teachers observe their own teaching or that of others? , 2011 .

[28]  Carole L. Palmer,et al.  The analytic potential of scientific data: Understanding re-use value , 2011, ASIST.

[29]  Jan Eberhardt,et al.  Understanding affordances and challenges of three types of video for teacher professional development , 2011 .

[30]  Lucila Ohno-Machado,et al.  DataMed – an open source discovery index for finding biomedical datasets , 2018, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[31]  Ricki Goldman,et al.  Conducting Video Research in the Learning Sciences: Guidance on Selection, Analysis, Technology, and Ethics , 2010 .

[32]  Catherine Cassell,et al.  Creating the interviewer: identity work in the management research process , 2005 .

[33]  Renata Gonçalves Curty,et al.  Factors Influencing Research Data Reuse in the Social Sciences: An Exploratory Study , 2016, Int. J. Digit. Curation.

[34]  Nicholas M. Weber,et al.  Qualitative data sharing and re-use for socio-environmental systems research: A synthesis of opportunities, challenges, resources and approaches , 2018 .

[35]  H. Rubin,et al.  Qualitative Interviewing (2nd ed.): The Art of Hearing Data , 2005 .

[36]  James J. Cimino,et al.  The National Institutes of Health's Biomedical Translational Research Information System (BTRIS): Design, contents, functionality and experience to date , 2014, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[37]  Besiki Stvilia,et al.  Prioritization of data quality dimensions and skills requirements in genome annotation work , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[38]  Libby Bishop,et al.  Revisiting Qualitative Data Reuse , 2017 .

[39]  Jian Wang,et al.  Scientific Data Relevance Criteria Classification and Usage , 2018, CSAE '18.

[40]  J. Heaton Secondary analysis of qualitative data: an overview , 2008 .

[41]  Elizabeth Yakel,et al.  Privacy Concerns in Qualitative Video Data Reuse , 2018, Int. J. Digit. Curation.

[42]  Cyrille Gaudin,et al.  Video viewing in teacher education and professional development: A literature review , 2015 .