Effectiveness Evaluation of Updating Final-State Control for Automated Guided Vehicles Motion Control with Collision Avoidance Problems

This paper discusses the effectiveness of using Updating Final-State Control (UFSC) for Automated Guided Vehicle (AGV) collision-avoidance problems, as an example of rigid body motion control problems that have time-varying states. This paper broadly comprises two parts: 1) clarification of the characteristics of the UFSC through numerical simulations in an ideal system and 2) experimental demonstrations. Regarding the former, this paper performs several numerical simulations and demonstrates the effectiveness of the UFSC through comparison with other methods: PID (Proportional-Integral-Derivative) control with a safety length constraint and MPC (Model Predictive Control). The results show the acceptable performance of the UFSC. In addition, the UFSC has some advantages with respect to the computation time, the effort required for control parameter tuning, and the performance retention of prior obstacle’s information and control parameters. For the experimental demonstrations, the authors add the realistic frictions, corresponding to the controlled object, to the one-dimensional model. The experiments are performed under four different conditions, and their results show the validity of the numerical simulations. The discussion in this paper supports the acceptable performance and effectiveness of the UFSC for these types of problems.

[1]  Manfred Morari,et al.  Real-time suboptimal model predictive control using a combination of explicit MPC and online optimization , 2008, 2008 47th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[2]  Toshiyuki Ohtsuka,et al.  A continuation/GMRES method for fast computation of nonlinear receding horizon control , 2004, Autom..

[3]  E. Allgower,et al.  Numerical Continuation Methods , 1990 .

[4]  C. Kelley Iterative Methods for Linear and Nonlinear Equations , 1987 .

[5]  Kazuo Yoshida,et al.  Digital Optimal Control of Elastic Structure Systems (Positioning Control of an Elastic Rotating Arm) : Vibration, Control Engineering, Engineering for Industry , 1987 .

[6]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Fast Model Predictive Control Using Online Optimization , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[7]  Roger V. Bostelman,et al.  Literature Review of Mobile Robots for Manufacturing , 2015 .

[8]  Susumu Hara,et al.  Proposal of updating final-state control and its application to a connection control problem , 2014, 2014 IEEE 13th International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control (AMC).

[9]  Fumitoshi Matsuno,et al.  Trajectory Generation Based on Model Predictive Control with Obstacle Avoidance between Prediction Time Steps , 2009 .

[10]  Kazuma Sekiguchi,et al.  Real-time model predictive obstacle avoidance control for vehicles with reduced computational effort using constraints of prohibited region , 2015 .

[11]  Hidekazu Nishimura,et al.  Final-State Control Using Compensation Input , 1994 .