Social Networks in East and Southeast Asia II

This second issue continues our study of social networks and social capital in East and Southeast Asia. The articles show both similarities and differences in how each country’s social contexts significantly affect the nature of their social networks. The articles consistently show an Asian version of networked individualism, based on close kinship and friendship, hierarchies, strong work ethics, frequent travel, and digital media. In Thai villages, migrants send remittances to family members back home to honor broader village networks and norms. In China, migrants who come from wealthier village families have larger friendship networks in cities. In Hong Kong, cultural differences such as language limit social interactions between Mainland Chinese and Hong Kong students. In Singapore, population characteristics substantially affect inter-ethnic contact. While social norms circumscribe behavior on Twitter in Japan, Sina Weibo in China is a more chaotic space with much fraudulent practice. In Taiwan, online and offline networks combine to affect participation in voluntary associations. In China and Singapore, authoritative contacts and weak ties increase as well as reduce personal well-being.

[1]  Victor Nee,et al.  A Theory of Market Transition: From Redistribution to Markets in State Socialism , 1989 .

[2]  Bonnie H. Erickson Why Some Occupations Are Better Known Than Others1 , 2008 .

[3]  Nan Lin,et al.  Social capital : an international research program , 2008 .

[4]  Juthathip Jongwanich Workers' remittances, economic growth and poverty in developing Asia and the Pacific countries , 2007 .

[5]  Bob Edwards,et al.  Social Capital: An International Research Program , 2010 .

[6]  Stephen D. Reese,et al.  Networked China : global dynamics of digital media and civic engagement : new agendas in communication , 2015 .

[7]  Alain Degenne Social capital: a theory of social structure and action , 2004 .

[8]  Ronald L. Breiger,et al.  Contexts of Social Capital: Social Networks in Markets, Communities and Families. , 2009 .

[9]  Andrew Wedeman The Intensification of Corruption in China , 2004, The China Quarterly.

[10]  Pierrette Hondagneu-Sotelo,et al.  “I'M HERE, BUT I'M THERE” , 1997 .

[11]  Jon T. S. Quah Curbing Corruption in Asian Countries: An Impossible Dream? , 2011 .

[12]  Mayfair M Yang Gifts, Favors, and Banquets: The Art of Social Relationships in China , 1996, Journal of Asian Studies.

[13]  P. Blau A Macrosociological Theory of Social Structure , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[14]  F. Al-Shamali,et al.  Author Biographies. , 2015, Journal of social work in disability & rehabilitation.

[15]  C. Ridgeway,et al.  Why Status Matters for Inequality , 2014 .

[16]  P. Boyle,et al.  Migrations and Family Relations in the Asia Pacific Region , 2002 .

[17]  T. Yamagishi The provision of a sanctioning system as a public good , 1986 .

[18]  C. Hirschman The making of race in colonial Malaya: Political economy and racial ideology , 1986 .

[19]  Stephan Haggard Emergent Economies, Divergent Paths: Economic Organization and International Trade in South Korea and Taiwan , 2007 .

[20]  Jonathan Bishop,et al.  Networked: The New Social Operating System , 2013, Int. J. E Politics.

[21]  Daniel P. Aldrich,et al.  The Externalities of Strong Social Capital: Post-Tsunami Recovery in Southeast India , 2010 .

[22]  Essential Outsiders: Chinese and Jews in the Modern Transformation of Southeast Asia and Central Europe , 1998 .

[23]  Joonmo Son Social Capital and Institutional Constraints: A Comparative Analysis of China, Taiwan and the US , 2012 .

[24]  Roger V. Gould Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences: USES OF NETWORK TOOLS IN COMPARATIVE HISTORICAL RESEARCH , 2003 .