A localized Richardson-Lucy algorithm for fiber orientation estimation in high angular resolution diffusion imaging.

PURPOSE Diffusion tensor imaging is widely used for studying neural fiber trajectories in white matter and for quantifying changes in tissue using diffusion properties at each voxel in the brain. To better model the nature of crossing fibers within complex architectures, rather than using a simplified tensor model that assumes only a single fiber direction at each image voxel, a model mixing multiple diffusion tensors is used to profile diffusion signals from high angular resolution diffusion imaging (HARDI) data. Based on the HARDI signal and a multiple tensors model, spherical deconvolution methods have been developed to overcome the limitations of the diffusion tensor model when resolving crossing fibers. The Richardson-Lucy algorithm is a popular spherical deconvolution method used in previous work. However, it is based on a Gaussian distribution, while HARDI data are always very noisy, and the distribution of HARDI data follows a Rician distribution. This current work aims to present a novel solution to address these issues. METHODS By simultaneously considering both the Rician bias and neighbor correlation in HARDI data, the authors propose a localized Richardson-Lucy (LRL) algorithm to estimate fiber orientations for HARDI data. The proposed method can simultaneously reduce noise and correct the Rician bias. RESULTS Mean angular error (MAE) between the estimated Fiber orientation distribution (FOD) field and the reference FOD field was computed to examine whether the proposed LRL algorithm offered any advantage over the conventional RL algorithm at various levels of noise. Normalized mean squared error (NMSE) was also computed to measure the similarity between the true FOD field and the estimated FOD filed. For MAE comparisons, the proposed LRL approach obtained the best results in most of the cases at different levels of SNR and b-values. For NMSE comparisons, the proposed LRL approach obtained the best results in most of the cases at b-value = 3000 s/mm(2), which is the recommended schema for HARDI data acquisition. In addition, the FOD fields estimated by the proposed LRL approach in regions of fiber crossing regions using real data sets also showed similar fiber structures which agreed with common acknowledge in these regions. CONCLUSIONS The novel spherical deconvolution method for improved accuracy in investigating crossing fibers can simultaneously reduce noise and correct Rician bias. With the noise smoothed and bias corrected, this algorithm is especially suitable for estimation of fiber orientations in HARDI data. Experimental results using both synthetic and real imaging data demonstrated the success and effectiveness of the proposed LRL algorithm.

[1]  Bengt Jönsson,et al.  Restricted Diffusion in Cylindrical Geometry , 1995 .

[2]  Derek K. Jones,et al.  Investigating the prevalence of complex fiber configurations in white matter tissue with diffusion magnetic resonance imaging , 2013, Human brain mapping.

[3]  Baba C. Vemuri,et al.  Adaptive Kernels for Multi-fiber Reconstruction , 2009, IPMI.

[4]  P. Basser,et al.  Microstructural and physiological features of tissues elucidated by quantitative-diffusion-tensor MRI. 1996. , 1996, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[5]  Carl-Fredrik Westin,et al.  Estimation of fiber Orientation Probability Density Functions in High Angular Resolution Diffusion Imaging , 2009, NeuroImage.

[6]  Timothy Edward John Behrens,et al.  Ball and rackets: Inferring fiber fanning from diffusion-weighted MRI , 2012, NeuroImage.

[7]  J Sijbers,et al.  Estimation of the noise in magnitude MR images. , 1998, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[8]  Thomas R. Knösche,et al.  Parametric spherical deconvolution: Inferring anatomical connectivity using diffusion MR imaging , 2007, NeuroImage.

[9]  Baba C. Vemuri,et al.  Resolution of complex tissue microarchitecture using the diffusion orientation transform (DOT) , 2006, NeuroImage.

[10]  Carl-Fredrik Westin,et al.  Restoration of DWI Data Using a Rician LMMSE Estimator , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  Guang Yang,et al.  Locally Weighted Regression for Estimating and Smoothing ODF Field Simultaneously , 2010, MIAR.

[12]  Giuseppe Scotti,et al.  A modified damped Richardson–Lucy algorithm to reduce isotropic background effects in spherical deconvolution , 2010, NeuroImage.

[13]  A. Anderson Measurement of fiber orientation distributions using high angular resolution diffusion imaging , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  Pierrick Coupé,et al.  Rician Noise Removal by Non-Local Means Filtering for Low Signal-to-Noise Ratio MRI: Applications to DT-MRI , 2008, MICCAI.

[15]  Christophe Lenglet,et al.  Estimating Orientation Distribution Functions with Probability Density Constraints and Spatial Regularity , 2009, MICCAI.

[16]  Yogesh Rathi,et al.  On approximation of orientation distributions by means of spherical ridgelets , 2008, ISBI.

[17]  Martha Elizabeth Shenton,et al.  Directional functions for orientation distribution estimation , 2008, ISBI.

[18]  Alan Connelly,et al.  Robust determination of the fibre orientation distribution in diffusion MRI: Non-negativity constrained super-resolved spherical deconvolution , 2007, NeuroImage.

[19]  H. Gudbjartsson,et al.  The rician distribution of noisy mri data , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  Baba C. Vemuri,et al.  A novel tensor distribution model for the diffusion-weighted MR signal , 2007, NeuroImage.

[21]  Ashish Raj,et al.  Spatial HARDI: Improved visualization of complex white matter architecture with Bayesian spatial regularization , 2011, NeuroImage.

[22]  Jan Sijbers,et al.  Noise measurement from magnitude MRI using local estimates of variance and skewness , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[23]  Ross T. Whitaker,et al.  Rician Noise Removal in Diffusion Tensor MRI , 2006, MICCAI.

[24]  Baba C. Vemuri,et al.  Regularized positive-definite fourth order tensor field estimation from DW-MRI , 2009, NeuroImage.

[25]  F. Calamante,et al.  Resolving crossing fibres using constrained spherical deconvolution : validation using DWI phantom data , 2007 .

[26]  D. Tuch Q‐ball imaging , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[27]  Carl-Fredrik Westin,et al.  A new methodology for the estimation of fiber populations in the white matter of the brain with the Funk–Radon transform , 2010, NeuroImage.

[28]  Kalvis M. Jansons,et al.  Persistent angular structure: new insights from diffusion magnetic resonance imaging data , 2003 .

[29]  C. Westin,et al.  Sequential anisotropic Wiener filtering applied to 3D MRI data. , 2007, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[30]  P. Basser,et al.  Estimation of the effective self-diffusion tensor from the NMR spin echo. , 1994, Journal of magnetic resonance. Series B.

[31]  Giuseppe Scotti,et al.  A Model-Based Deconvolution Approach to Solve Fiber Crossing in Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[32]  R. Deriche,et al.  Regularized, fast, and robust analytical Q‐ball imaging , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[33]  P. Basser,et al.  Microstructural and physiological features of tissues elucidated by quantitative-diffusion-tensor MRI. , 1996, Journal of magnetic resonance. Series B.

[34]  Frans Vos,et al.  Adaptive Noise Filtering for Accurate and Precise Diffusion Estimation in Fiber Crossings , 2010, MICCAI.

[35]  N. Makris,et al.  High angular resolution diffusion imaging reveals intravoxel white matter fiber heterogeneity , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[36]  Daniel C. Alexander,et al.  Maximum Entropy Spherical Deconvolution for Diffusion MRI , 2005, IPMI.

[37]  A. R. De Pierro,et al.  On the relation between the ISRA and the EM algorithm for positron emission tomography , 1993, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[38]  G. Sapiro,et al.  Reconstruction of the orientation distribution function in single‐ and multiple‐shell q‐ball imaging within constant solid angle , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.