Capturing Reasoning Process through User Interaction

In recent years, visual analytics has taken an important role in solving many types of complex analytical problems that require deep and specific domain knowledge from users. While the analysis products generated by these expert users are of great importance, how these users apply their domain expertise in using the visualization to validate their hypotheses and arrive at conclusions is often just as invaluable. Recent research efforts in capturing an expert’s reasoning process using a visualization have shown that some of a user’s analysis process is indeed recoverable. However, there does not exist a generalizable principle that explains the success of these domainspecific systems in capturing the user’s reasoning process. In this paper, we present a framework that examines two aspects of the capturing process. First, we inspect how a user’s reasoning process can be captured by utilizing van Wijk’s operational model of visualization. Second, we evaluate the likelihood of success in capturing a user’s interactions in a visualization by introducing three criteria designed for disambiguating the meanings behind the interactions. Various visualization systems in the visualization and HCI communities are examined for the purpose of demonstrating the impact of the three criteria.

[1]  Heidi Lam,et al.  A Framework of Interaction Costs in Information Visualization , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[2]  William Ribarsky,et al.  WireVis: Visualization of Categorical, Time-Varying Data From Financial Transactions , 2007, 2007 IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology.

[3]  J.C. Roberts,et al.  State of the Art: Coordinated & Multiple Views in Exploratory Visualization , 2007, Fifth International Conference on Coordinated and Multiple Views in Exploratory Visualization (CMV 2007).

[4]  J. Creswell Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches , 2006 .

[5]  John T. Stasko,et al.  Toward a Deeper Understanding of the Role of Interaction in Information Visualization , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[6]  Michael Gertz,et al.  A Model and Framework for Visualization Exploration , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[7]  Jeffrey Heer,et al.  Animated Transitions in Statistical Data Graphics , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[8]  Annie Lang,et al.  Measuring psychological responses to media messages , 1994 .

[9]  John T. Stasko,et al.  The Science of Interaction , 2009, Inf. Vis..

[10]  Pierre Dragicevic,et al.  Rolling the Dice: Multidimensional Visual Exploration using Scatterplot Matrix Navigation , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[11]  J. J. van Wijk The value of visualization , 2005 .

[12]  J. Gregory Trafton,et al.  Turning pictures into numbers: extracting and generating information from complex visualizations , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[13]  Matthew O. Ward,et al.  XmdvTool: integrating multiple methods for visualizing multivariate data , 1994, Proceedings Visualization '94.

[14]  Jaegul Choo,et al.  Two-stage framework for visualization of clustered high dimensional data , 2009, 2009 IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology.

[15]  Jarke J. van Wijk,et al.  The value of visualization , 2005, VIS 05. IEEE Visualization, 2005..

[16]  Christopher Ahlberg,et al.  Spotfire: an information exploration environment , 1996, SGMD.

[17]  Amy Banic,et al.  Social responses to virtual humans: implications for future interface design , 2007, CHI.

[18]  Dennis P. Groth,et al.  Provenance and Annotation for Visual Exploration Systems , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[19]  W. Neuman,et al.  Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 2002 .

[20]  David F. Redmiles,et al.  Extracting usability information from user interface events , 2000, CSUR.

[21]  Jeffrey Heer,et al.  Graphical Histories for Visualization: Supporting Analysis, Communication, and Evaluation , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[22]  Jarke J. van Wijk,et al.  Supporting the analytical reasoning process in information visualization , 2008, CHI.

[23]  Cláudio T. Silva,et al.  Provenance for Visualizations: Reproducibility and Beyond , 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[24]  William Ribarsky,et al.  Recovering Reasoning Processes from User Interactions , 2009, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[25]  M. Sheelagh T. Carpendale,et al.  Grounded evaluation of information visualizations , 2008, BELIV.