Large shifts in perceived motion direction reveal multiple global motion solutions

Moving objects are thought to be decomposed into one-dimensional motion components by early cortical visual processing. Two rules describing how these components might be re-combined to produce coherent object motion are the intersection of constraints and the vector average rules. Using stimuli for which these combination rules predict different directional solutions, we found that adapting one of the solutions through motion adaptation switched perceived direction to the other solution. The effects were symmetrical: shifts from IOC to VA, and from VA to IOC, were observed following adaptation. These large shifts indicate that multiple solutions to global motion processing coexist and compete to determine perceived motion direction.

[1]  Christopher C. Pack,et al.  Temporal dynamics of a neural solution to the aperture problem in visual area MT of macaque brain , 2001, Nature.

[2]  A. Watson,et al.  Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  H. Wilson,et al.  Spatial frequency tuning of orientation selective units estimated by oblique masking , 1983, Vision Research.

[4]  David R. Badcock,et al.  Analysis of the motion of 2-dimensional patterns: Evidence for a second-order process , 1992, Vision Research.

[5]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  Perceived direction of moving two-dimensional patterns depends on duration, contrast and eccentricity , 1992, Vision Research.

[6]  Darren Burke,et al.  The contribution of one-dimensional motion mechanisms to the perceived direction of drifting plaids and their aftereffects , 1994, Vision Research.

[7]  J. B. Mulligan,et al.  Effect of contrast on the perceived direction of a moving plaid , 1990, Vision Research.

[8]  L. Bowns.  Evidence for a Feature Tracking Explanation of Why Type II Plaids Move in the Vector Sum Direction at Short Durations , 1996, Vision Research.

[9]  H. Rodman,et al.  Single-unit analysis of pattern-motion selective properties in the middle temporal visual area (MT) , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  Charles G. Gross,et al.  Pattern recognition mechanisms , 1985 .

[11]  L Bowns,et al.  Can spatio-temporal energy models of motion predict feature motion? , 2002, Vision Research.

[12]  E. Adelson,et al.  Phenomenal coherence of moving visual patterns , 1982, Nature.

[13]  A Pantle,et al.  Size-Detecting Mechanisms in Human Vision , 1968, Science.

[14]  Thomas D. Albright,et al.  Neural correlates of perceptual motion coherence , 1992, Nature.

[15]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Local velocity representation: evidence from motion adaptation , 1998, Vision Research.

[16]  David J. Heeger,et al.  Pattern-motion responses in human visual cortex , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  G. Sperling,et al.  The functional architecture of human visual motion perception , 1995, Vision Research.

[18]  H. Wilson,et al.  A psychophysically motivated model for two-dimensional motion perception , 1992, Visual Neuroscience.

[19]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  Motion illusions as optimal percepts , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  Linda Bowns,et al.  ‘Squaring’ is Better at Predicting Plaid Motion than the Vector Average or Intersection of Constraints , 2006, Perception.