Modeling a monocrystalline Cu(In,Ga)Se2 single junction solar cell grown on a GaAs substrate

A polycrystalline Cu(In,Ga)Se2 (CIGS) single junction solar cell model is developed with dependencies on the molar fraction of In and Ga with a 0.8 eV Shockley-Read-Hall (SRH) trap level above the valence band. The simulated performance of this solar cell over molar fraction compares well to data published in the literature using the SRH minority carrier lifetime to fit the trend in open circuit voltage. The material parameters are then used as a foundation for a numerical model of a monocrystalline CIGS solar cell grown on a GaAs substrate with an emphasis on modeling the CIGS/GaAs interface where a molar fraction gradient in CIGS forms due to lattice mismatch induced inter-diffusion of Ga and In from the substrate and CIGS layers. Without strain effects due to the lattice mismatch, the CIGS monocrystalline solar cell has an efficiency of 18.6% under the AM1.5G spectrum (1000 W/m2) with a short circuit current density of 36.5 mA/cm2, an open circuit voltage of 0.66 V and a fill factor of 77.4%. However, when reasonable strain effects are considered, such as the formation of strained induced interface defects and threading dislocation densities (TDD), the efficiency degrades to 6% for TDD < 1x107 cm-2. The models are able to reproduce a similar structure’s measured performance using a TDD of 1.5×107 cm-2 and a surface recombination velocity of 108 cm/s at the CdS/CIGS interface.

[1]  T. Nakada,et al.  Photoluminescence and time-resolved photoluminescence in Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin films and solar cells , 2009 .

[2]  K. Hinzer,et al.  Temperature dependent external quantum efficiency simulations and experimental measurement of lattice matched quantum dot enhanced multi-junction solar cells , 2011, 2011 37th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference.

[3]  A. Rockett,et al.  Single crystal and polycrystalline CuInSe/sub 2/ by the hybrid sputtering and evaporation method , 1991, The Conference Record of the Twenty-Second IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference - 1991.

[4]  C. Rincón,et al.  Alloy composition and temperature dependence of the fundamental absorption edge in CuGaxIn1−xSe2 , 1994 .

[5]  D. Hariskos,et al.  New world record efficiency for Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin‐film solar cells beyond 20% , 2011 .

[6]  V. Aimez,et al.  Multijunction Solar Cell Designs Using Silicon Bottom Subcell and Porous Silicon Compliant Membrane , 2013, IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics.

[7]  M. Lee,et al.  Impact of dislocation densities on n+∕p and p+∕n junction GaAs diodes and solar cells on SiGe virtual substrates , 2005 .

[8]  K. Ng,et al.  The Physics of Semiconductor Devices , 2019, Springer Proceedings in Physics.

[9]  A. Rockett,et al.  Near-surface electronic defects and morphology of CuIn1−xGaxSe2 , 2002 .

[10]  Rommel Noufi,et al.  Recombination kinetics and stability in polycrystalline Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells , 2009 .

[11]  U. Rau,et al.  Composition dependence of defect energies and band alignments in the Cu(In1−xGax)(Se1−ySy)2 alloy system , 2002 .

[12]  J. Nelson The physics of solar cells , 2003 .

[13]  W. Shafarman,et al.  Optical characterization of CuIn1−xGaxSe2 alloy thin films by spectroscopic ellipsometry , 2003 .

[14]  Martin A. Green,et al.  Solar cell efficiency tables (version 40) , 2012 .

[15]  Shiro Nishiwaki,et al.  Highly efficient Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells grown on flexible polymer films. , 2011, Nature materials.

[16]  Antonio Luque,et al.  Handbook of photovoltaic science and engineering , 2011 .

[17]  A. Rockett,et al.  Effect of Ga content on defect states in CuIn 1¿x Ga x Se 2 photovoltaic devices , 2002 .

[18]  安達 定雄,et al.  Optical constants of crystalline and amorphous semiconductors : numerical data and graphical information , 1999 .

[19]  A. Rockett,et al.  Hole transport and doping states in epitaxial CuIn1−xGaxSe2 , 1998 .

[20]  R. Feist,et al.  Structure optimization for a high efficiency CIGS solar cell , 2010, 2010 35th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference.