Design thinking: Opinions and experiences of middle school students

The aim of the present research is to examine the opinions and experiences of 7th grade students towards design thinking. In this context, activities for design thinking about energy transformations included in the science curriculum were conducted for four weeks. Phenomenology method, one of the qualitative research methods, was used in the study carried out with thirty-six 7th grade students. The students' opinions about design thinking were obtained through open-ended questions and their experiences through diaries. Content analysis method was used to analyse the data collected from the open-ended questionnaire and the student diaries. In line with the students' views on design thinking, 7 themes emerged: Contributions of design thinking, difficulties encountered in the implementation of design thinking, difficulty level of design thinking stages, getting support during the implementation of design thinking, degree of appreciation of design thinking stages, spending time for design thinking activities in the future and participating in design thinking activities outside of school. As a result of the analysis of the diaries, three themes emerged: learning, satisfaction and criticism. It is thought that the opinions and experiences of middle school students towards design thinking will contribute to the design of learning environments in a more qualified way.

[1]  Derya Girgin.  Öğretmenlerin Tasarım Odaklı Düşünmeye İlişkin Bilişsel Yapıları ve Kavramsal Değişimleri , 2019 .

[2]  Laura Zangori,et al.  Assessing the contributions of green building practices to ecological literacy in the elementary classroom: an exploratory study , 2019, Environmental Education Research.

[3]  Carman Neustaedter,et al.  Becoming a Design Thinker: Assessing the Learning Process of Students in a Secondary Level Design Thinking Course. , 2018 .

[4]  Sarah B. Bush,et al.  Design thinking in integrated STEAM learning: Surveying the landscape and exploring exemplars in elementary grades , 2018 .

[5]  Nicolò Canestraro.  The impact of Design Thinking on education: the Case of Active Learning Lab , 2017 .

[6]  Soner Yildirim,et al.  A phenomenological study: teachers’ experiences of using digital storytelling in early childhood education , 2016 .

[7]  Kala S. Retna.  Thinking about “design thinking”: a study of teacher experiences , 2016, Teachers’ Perceptions, Experience and Learning.

[8]  Nathan Mentzer,et al.  Engineering design thinking: High school students' performance and knowledge , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL).

[9]  Christina V. Schwarz,et al.  Empirical validation of integrated learning performances for hydrologic phenomena: 3rd‐grade students' model‐driven explanation‐construction , 2015 .

[10]  Leila Aflatoony,et al.  Development, implementation, and evaluation of an interaction design thinking course in the context of secondary education , 2015 .

[11]  Kristen B. Wendell.  Design Practices of Preservice Elementary Teachers in an Integrated Engineering and Literature Experience. , 2014 .

[12]  M. Kabilan.  A phenomenological study of an international teaching practicum: Pre-service teachers' experiences of professional development , 2013 .

[13]  M. Metz,et al.  A phenomenological study of teachers' professional learning and their understanding of mathematics-for-teaching , 2013 .

[14]  Ece Zehir Topkaya.  Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri Güncelleştirilmiş 5. Baskı , 2013 .

[15]  M. Savin-Baden,et al.  Qualitative Research: The essential guide to theory and practice , 2012 .

[16]  V. Shute,et al.  What Is Design Thinking and Why Is It Important? , 2012 .

[17]  Neil Anderson.  Design Thinking , 2012, Australian and International Journal of Rural Education.

[18]  K. Seers.  Qualitative data analysis , 2011, Evidence Based Nursing.

[19]  Kees Dorst,et al.  The core of ‘design thinking’ and its application , 2011 .

[20]  Artur Lugmayr,et al.  Applying "design thinking" as a method for teaching in media education , 2011, MindTrek.

[21]  A. Royalty,et al.  Destination, Imagination and the Fires Within: Design Thinking in a Middle School Classroom , 2010 .

[22]  Gyoungho Lee,et al.  Identifying student difficulty in problem solving process via the framework of the House Model (HM) , 2008 .

[23]  R. Marx,et al.  Design‐based science and student learning , 2004 .

[24]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  Promoting Deep Science Learning Through Case-Based Reasoning: Rituals and Practices in Learning by Design Classrooms , 2004 .

[25]  A. Huberman,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook , 1994 .

[26]  A. Strauss.  Basics Of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[27]  Darlene Painter.  Using Design Thinking in Mathematics for Middle School Students: A Multiple Case Study of Teacher Perspectives , 2018 .

[28]  Dani Chesson,et al.  Design Thinker Profile: Creating and Validating a Scale for Measuring Design Thinking Capabilities , 2017 .

[29]  Danah Henriksen,et al.  Creating STEAM with Design Thinking: Beyond STEM and Arts Integration , 2017 .

[30]  Rex Lor.  Design thinking in education: a critical review of literature , 2017 .

[31]  L. Aflatoony,et al.  Thoughtful Thinkers: Secondary Schoolers’ Learning about Design Thinking , 2015 .

[32]  Maureen Carroll.  Stretch, Dream, and Do - A 21st Century Design Thinking & STEM Journey , 2015 .

[33]  P. Norton,et al.  In Search of a Teacher Education Curriculum: Appropriating a Design Lens to Solve Problems of Practice. , 2015 .

[34]  Mark Felton,et al.  The development of discourse strategies in adolescent argumentation , 2004 .