The Science Base of Renewables

Abstract Initiatives to foster the development of Renewable Energy Technologies (RETs) can benefit from a deep understanding of the science base that underlies such technologies, and especially how that science base differs from that of Fossil Fuel based Energy Technologies (FFETs). This paper investigates both science bases using citations in patents to scientific journals. We find that RETs generally have a more substantial science base and draw on a more diverse set of scientific disciplines. On average, the science on which RETs build is more recent, less applied and is published in journals with a higher WOS Journal Impact Factor. However, for different RETs (e.g., photovoltaics, wind turbines and non-fossil fuels), we observe much more variation across these dimensions than for different FFETs (e.g., combustion and gas turbines). Furthermore, the broad spectrum of sciences on which RETs build largely includes the smaller spectrum on which FFETs build. Based on these findings, we offer several policy recommendations to better stimulate the development of RETs.

[1]  Nicolò Barbieri,et al.  Knowledge sources and impacts on subsequent inventions: Do green technologies differ from non-green ones? , 2020 .

[2]  M. Meyer.  Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature , 2000 .

[3]  V. Veefkind,et al.  A new EPO classification scheme for climate change mitigation technologies , 2012 .

[4]  Matt Marx,et al.  Reliance on Science: Worldwide Front-Page Patent Citations to Scientific Articles , 2019, Strategic Management Journal.

[5]  C. Freeman.  Economics of Industrial Innovation , 1975 .

[6]  Sam Arts,et al.  Paradise of Novelty - Or Loss of Human Capital? Exploring New Fields and Inventive Output , 2018, Organ. Sci..

[7]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  A review of the literature on citation impact indicators , 2015, J. Informetrics.

[8]  W. P. Strassmann.  Perspectives on Technology. By Nathan Rosenberg. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976. Pp. x, 353 , 1977, The Journal of Economic History.

[9]  B. Truffer,et al.  Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects , 2012 .

[10]  M. Marx,et al.  Reliance on science: Worldwide front‐page patent citations to scientific articles , 2020 .

[11]  David L. Deeds,et al.  An Analysis of the Critical Role of Public Science in Innovation: The Case of Biotechnology , 2000 .

[12]  Johann Peter Murmann,et al.  Toward a Systematic Framework for Research on Dominant Designs, Technological Innovations, and Industrial Change , 2006 .

[13]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  An exploration of the science base of recent technology , 1990 .

[14]  T. Schmidt,et al.  Technology Life-Cycles in the Energy Sector – Technological Characteristics and the Role of Deployment for Innovation , 2015 .

[15]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  Measuring Technological Novelty with Patent-Based Indicators , 2015 .

[16]  William J. Abernathy,et al.  Patterns of Industrial Innovation , 1978 .

[17]  Francis Narin,et al.  Is technology becoming science? , 1985, Scientometrics.

[18]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  Linking science to technology: Using bibliographic references in patents to build linkage schemes , 2004, Scientometrics.

[19]  Dale S. Niederhauser,et al.  The Nature of Technology , 2013 .

[20]  Antoine Dechezleprêtre,et al.  Knowledge Spillovers from Clean and Dirty Technologies , 2014 .

[21]  Ayala Cohen,et al.  Comparing Regression Coefficients Across Subsamples , 1983 .

[22]  Mark P. J. van der Loo,et al.  The stringdist Package for Approximate String Matching , 2014, R J..

[23]  Charlie Wilson.  Up-scaling, formative phases, and learning in the historical diffusion of energy technologies , 2012 .

[24]  Bart Verspagen,et al.  Does it matter where patent citations come from? Inventor versus examiner citations in European patents , 2005 .

[25]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  Traces of Prior Art: An analysis of non-patent references found in patent documents , 2006, Scientometrics.

[26]  G. Dosi.  Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change , 1982 .

[27]  David Popp,et al.  From Science to Technology: The Value of Knowledge from Different Energy Research Institutions , 2016 .

[28]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change , 1990 .

[29]  M. Mazzucato.  From market fixing to market-creating: a new framework for innovation policy , 2016, Innovation Systems, Policy and Management.

[30]  K. Pavitt.  Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change : Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory : Research Policy , 1984 .

[31]  Weiwei Song,et al.  Framework of High-Technology Industry Innovation of China: Intellectual Property Protection and Industrial Knowledge Base , 2015 .

[32]  E. Mansfield.  Academic Research Underlying Industrial Innovations , 1995 .

[33]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Nanotechnology as a field of science: Its delineation in terms of journals and patents , 2007, Scientometrics.

[34]  Takashi Sekiyama.  The Impact of the Fourth Industrial Revolution on Student Mobility from the Perspective of Education Economics , 2020, Creative Education.

[35]  Gregory F. Nemet,et al.  Inter-technology knowledge spillovers for energy technologies , 2012 .

[36]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Perspectives on technology , 1977 .

[37]  O. Sorenson,et al.  Science as a Map in Technological Search , 2000 .

[38]  Jochen Markard,et al.  Innovation processes in large technical systems: Market liberalization as a driver for radical change? , 2006 .