The Effects of Schedule-driven Project Management in Multi-project Environments.

Abstract Prior work has affirmed the importance of studying project management in multi-project environments. A challenge in these settings pertains to the need to share skilled resources across concurrent projects when project management is schedule-driven and resource capacity is fully committed. To probe into this problem, we use a system dynamics simulation grounded on in-depth fieldwork with a high-performance truck developer. We simulate the effects of capturing resources allocated originally to one project so as to speed up another product development project that started late. Our central contribution is to illuminate how a schedule-driven project management policy can lead to a vicious cycle that degrades the organization's capability to meet the planned project milestones in the long-term. Whilst capturing resources can ensure that a tardy but ‘business-critical’ project is delivered on time, if the organization has no free resource capacity and is also not recruiting more staff, this practice harms the schedule performance of the projects deprived from resources. Further, the workforce's productivity gradually deteriorates as the frequency with which staff switches back and forth between projects increases. These effects compounded cause delays in all the subsequent projects, irremediably degrading the organization's capability to deliver projects on time reliably.

[1]  P. Eskerod,et al.  Project portfolio management - There's more to it than what management enacts , 2008 .

[2]  J. Sterman Learning in and about complex systems , 1994 .

[3]  C. Crawford The Hidden Costs of Accelerated Product Development , 1992 .

[4]  Scott E. Fricke,et al.  Managing multiple engineering projects in a manufacturing support environment , 2000, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[5]  J. Forrester Industrial Dynamics , 1997 .

[6]  Jonas Söderlund,et al.  On the broadening scope of the research on projects: A review and a model for analysis , 2004 .

[7]  Peter W. G. Morris,et al.  The management of projects , 1994 .

[8]  Jonas Söderlund,et al.  Getting control of multi-project organizations: Combining contingent control mechanisms , 2010 .

[9]  Karlos Artto,et al.  Problems in managing internal development projects in multi-project environments , 2003 .

[10]  P. Kidwell,et al.  The mythical man-month: Essays on software engineering , 1996, IEEE Annals of the History of Computing.

[11]  A. Griffin PDMA Research on New Product Development Practices: Updating Trends and Benchmarking Best Practices , 1997 .

[12]  Mats Engwall,et al.  The resource allocation syndrome: the prime challenge of multi-project management? , 2003 .

[13]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry , 1995 .

[14]  I. Kurtulus,et al.  Multi-Project Scheduling: Categorization of Heuristic Rules Performance , 1982 .

[15]  David N. Ford,et al.  The Liar's Club: Concealing Rework in Concurrent Development , 2003, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[16]  M. Rosenau Faster New Product Development , 1988 .

[17]  Milton D. Rosenau,et al.  From experience: Faster new product development , 1988 .

[18]  Joana Geraldi,et al.  The balance between order and chaos in multi-project firms: A conceptual model , 2008 .

[19]  Z. Miskawi,et al.  An S-curve equation for project control , 1989 .

[20]  Zohar Laslo,et al.  Resource allocation under uncertainty in a multi-project matrix environment: Is organizational conflict inevitable? , 2008 .

[21]  S. A. Buckler The Spiritual Nature of Innovation , 1997 .

[22]  Richard F. Deckro,et al.  Optimization analysis for design and planning of multi-project programs , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[23]  Michael A. Cusumano,et al.  Thinking Beyond Lean: How Multi Project Management is Transforming Product Development at Toyota and Other Companies , 1998 .

[24]  D. B. Montgomery,et al.  First‐mover advantages , 1988 .

[25]  Michael Pidd,et al.  Tools for Thinking—Modelling in Management Science , 1997 .

[26]  Durward K. Sobek,et al.  The Second Toyota Paradox: How Delaying Decisions Can Make Better Cars Faster , 1995 .

[27]  John A. Kuprenas Implementation and performance of a matrix organization structure , 2003 .

[28]  D. Jonas Empowering project portfolio managers: How management involvement impacts project portfolio management performance , 2010 .

[29]  James M. Lyneis,et al.  Strategic management of complex projects: a case study using system dynamics , 2001 .

[30]  Stylianos Kavadias,et al.  OPTIMAL PROJECT SEQUENCING WITH RECOURSE AT A SCARCE RESOURCE , 2009 .

[31]  Roger Calantone,et al.  Performance and time to market: accelerating cycle time with overlapping stages , 2000, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[32]  Stuart E. Madnick,et al.  Software Project Dynamics: An Integrated Approach , 1991 .

[33]  Jay W. Forrester,et al.  Industrial Dynamics---After the First Decade , 1968 .

[34]  Richard de Neufville,et al.  Flexibility in engineering design / Richard de Neufvilleand Stefan Scholtes , 2011 .

[35]  Michael A. Cusumano,et al.  Multiproject strategy, design transfer, and project performance: a survey of automobile development projects in the US and Japan , 1995 .

[36]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Stage-gate systems: A new tool for managing new products , 1990 .

[37]  P. Biernacki,et al.  Snowball Sampling: Problems and Techniques of Chain Referral Sampling , 1981 .

[38]  Matti Kaulio,et al.  Project leadership in multi-project settings: Findings from a critical incident study , 2008 .

[39]  N. Repenning Understanding fire fighting in new product development , 2001 .

[40]  Steven C. Wheelwright,et al.  Revolutionizing Product Development: Quantum Leaps in Speed, Efficiency and Quality , 1992 .

[41]  Edward B. Roberts,et al.  Managerial Applications of System Dynamics , 1981 .

[42]  Richard F. Deckro,et al.  A heuristic for multi-project scheduling with limited resources in the housing industry , 1990 .

[43]  Steven C. Wheelwright,et al.  Revolutionizing New Product Development: Quantum Leaps in Speed, Efficiency, and Quality (Революция в разработке продуктов: количественный скачок в скорости, эффективности и качестве) , 1992 .

[44]  Steffen Bayer,et al.  Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world , 2004 .

[45]  Edward B. Roberts,et al.  A simple model of R & D project dynamics , 1974 .

[46]  Denise Bower,et al.  Construction client multi-projects – A complex adaptive systems perspective , 2009 .

[47]  David O'Sullivan,et al.  Multiple project management: a modern competitive necessity , 2005 .

[48]  Alex Pavlak Project Troubleshooting: Tiger Teams for Reactive Risk Management , 2004 .

[49]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Portfolio Management in New Product Development: Lessons from the Leaders-I , 1997 .

[50]  Tarek K. Abdel-Hamid,et al.  Understanding the "90% syndrome" in software project management: A simulation-based case study , 1988, J. Syst. Softw..