Managing Complex Research Datasets Using Electronic Tools: A Meta-Analysis Exemplar

Meta-analyses of broad scope and complexity require investigators to organize many study documents and manage communication among several research staff. Commercially available electronic tools, for example, EndNote, Adobe Acrobat Pro, Blackboard, Excel, and IBM SPSS Statistics (SPSS), are useful for organizing and tracking the meta-analytic process as well as enhancing communication among research team members. The purpose of this article is to describe the electronic processes designed, using commercially available software, for an extensive, quantitative model-testing meta-analysis. Specific electronic tools improved the efficiency of (a) locating and screening studies, (b) screening and organizing studies and other project documents, (c) extracting data from primary studies, (d) checking data accuracy and analyses, and (e) communication among team members. The major limitation in designing and implementing a fully electronic system for meta-analysis was the requisite upfront time to decide on which electronic tools to use, determine how these tools would be used, develop clear guidelines for their use, and train members of the research team. The electronic process described here has been useful in streamlining the process of conducting this complex meta-analysis and enhancing communication and sharing documents among research team members.

[1]  Mark W. Lipsey,et al.  Practical Meta-Analysis , 2000 .

[2]  S. Prato,et al.  Glucose control: closing the gap between guidelines and practice , 2006 .

[3]  Harris Cooper,et al.  Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis: A Step-by-Step Approach , 2009 .

[4]  Idf Clinical Guidelines Task Force Global Guideline for Type 2 Diabetes: recommendations for standard, comprehensive, and minimal care , 2006, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[5]  L. Hedges,et al.  Predicting Metabolic Control in Diabetes: A Pilot Study Using Meta‐Analysis To Estimate a Linear Model , 1994, Nursing research.

[6]  V. Conn Anxiety Outcomes After Physical Activity Interventions: Meta-Analysis Findings , 2010, Nursing research.

[7]  H. Cooper,et al.  Grey Literature in Meta-Analyses , 2003, Nursing research.

[8]  David R. Mehr,et al.  Interventions to increase physical activity among healthy adults: meta-analysis of outcomes. , 2011, American journal of public health.

[9]  S A Brown,et al.  Studies of educational interventions and outcomes in diabetic adults: a meta-analysis revisited. , 1990, Patient education and counseling.

[10]  Vicki S Conn,et al.  Research methods: managing primary study quality in meta-analyses. , 2003, Research in nursing & health.

[11]  S. Brown Quality of reporting in diabetes patient education research: 1954-1986. , 1990, Research in nursing & health.

[12]  Sharon A Brown,et al.  Promoting Weight Loss in Type II Diabetes , 1996, Diabetes Care.

[13]  Sharon A Brown,et al.  A Framework for Developing a Coding Scheme for Meta-Analysis , 2003, Western journal of nursing research.

[14]  Sharon A. Brown Effects of Educational Interventions In Diabetes Care: A Meta‐Analysis of Findings , 1988, Nursing research.

[15]  W B Jonas,et al.  Impact of study quality on outcome in placebo-controlled trials of homeopathy. , 1999, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[16]  M. Tramèr,et al.  Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study , 1997, BMJ.