Tailoring texture for the elderly: theoretical aspects and technological options.

The perception of what is known as "texture" is a result of a variety of primarily mechanical and acoustical events. These are sensed by receptors of different kinds that are unevenly distributed in the sensing organ(s) (tongue, jaws, fingers) and neighboring tissues. The perceived intensity of textural properties is time dependent and can be influenced by other stimuli, notably chemical and thermal. The exact mode in which mechanical and geometrical properties are translated into perceived texture is not known. There are, however, known trends based on empirical observations, and growing understanding of the operation of individual receptors and the physiology and biomechanics of the sensation process itself. This body of knowledge can provide rational guidelines for the development of special products for the elderly and other people with special needs. For example, it is possible to increase fragility and maintain crunchiness or to make chewy foods that require a reduced effort in mastication to minimize fatigue. The technology to make such products is already in place and its future use by the food industry will depend only on marketing opportunities.

[1]  Lawrence E. Marks,et al.  Sensory Processes: The new Psychophysics , 1975 .

[2]  P. Grigg Biophysical studies of mechanoreceptors. , 1986, Journal of applied physiology.

[3]  The Mechanical Sensitivity of Soft Compressible Testing Machines , 1989 .

[4]  Mark D. Normand,et al.  Characterization of the Jagged Stress‐strain Relationships of Puffed Extrudates using the Fast Fourier Transform and Fractal Analysis , 1992 .

[5]  R. Johansson,et al.  Properties of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the human hand related to touch sensation. , 1984, Human neurobiology.

[6]  W. L. Kydd,et al.  Progressive jaw muscle fatigue and electromyogram activity produced by isometric unilateral biting. , 1986, Cranio : the journal of craniomandibular practice.

[7]  COMPRESSION RATES IN THE MOUTH , 1977 .

[8]  Zata M Vickers Crispness and Crunchiness - Textural Attributes with Auditory Components , 1987 .

[9]  F. Nakazawa,et al.  PALATAL PRESSURE PATTERNS OF GELATIN GELS IN THE MOUTH , 1991 .

[10]  M. Reiner,et al.  CHAPTER 9 – RHEOLOGICAL TERMINOLOGY , 1967 .

[11]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  Subjective Hardness of Compliant Materials , 1964 .

[12]  A. Szczesniak Classification of textural characteristics , 1963 .

[13]  W. E. Lee,et al.  Tracking foodstuff location within the mouth in real time : a sensory method , 1991 .

[14]  M. Peleg,et al.  Alginate Texturization of Highly Acid Fruit Pulps and Juices , 1990 .

[15]  L Roberts Genetic Engineers Build a Better Tomato: Green, flavorless, and rock hard, the store-bought tomato is perhaps the cruelest invention of American agriculture. Now hope is in sight for a tomato that tastes. , 1988, Science.

[16]  P. Lillford,et al.  THE PERCEPTION OF FOOD TEXTURE ‐ THE PHILOSOPHY OF THE BREAKDOWN PATH , 1988 .

[17]  M. Peleg,et al.  A Computer Assisted Analysis of Some Theoretical Rate Effects in Mastication and in Deformation Testing of Foods , 1982 .

[18]  Micha Peleg THEORETICAL ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MECHANICAL HARDNESS AND ITS SENSORY ASSESSMENT , 1980 .

[19]  M. Peleg,et al.  Determination of elasticity of gels by successive compression- decompression cycles , 1991 .

[20]  T. Haraldson,et al.  Endurance tests of the masticatory system on different bite force levels. , 1988, Scandinavian journal of dental research.