Show, Not Tell: The Contingency Role of Infographics Versus Text in the Differential Effects of Message Strategies on Optimistic Bias

Using an online between-subject experiment, this study tested the effects of message framing (gain vs. loss), reference point (self vs. other), and modality (text vs. infographics) in the scenario of recycling promotion. The findings identified that modality determines under what circumstances message strategies make a difference in risk perception and optimistic bias. In particular, only when paired with infographics and other-referencing point are loss-framed messages more effective than gain-framed messages in increasing risk perception and reducing the self-other gap in perceived benefits. Moreover, risk perception variables and the self-other risk perceptual gap were significant predictors of promoted behavioral intentions.

[1]  Lucy Atkinson,et al.  Putting Environmental Infographics Center Stage , 2015 .

[2]  T. Tyler,et al.  The mass media and judgments of risk: Distinguishing impact on personal and societal level judgments. , 1984 .

[3]  Jeffrey Heer,et al.  Narrative Visualization: Telling Stories with Data , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[4]  Carolyn A. Lin,et al.  Effects of Message Framing and Visual-Fear Appeals on Smoker Responses to Antismoking Ads , 2015, Journal of health communication.

[5]  Scot Burton,et al.  The influence of consumer concern about global climate change on framing effects for environmental sustainability messages , 2012 .

[6]  D. A. Gold,et al.  Mental representations of the self, significant others, and nonsignificant others: structure and processing of private and public aspects. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  S. Kruikemeier,et al.  When Does an Infographic Say More Than a Thousand Words? , 2017 .

[8]  P. Stern,et al.  Value Orientations, Gender, and Environmental Concern , 1993 .

[9]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Let's Get Personal: An International Examination of the Influence of Communication, Culture and Social Distance on Other Regarding Preferences , 2006 .

[10]  Sally M. Dunlop,et al.  Can You Feel It? Negative Emotion, Risk, and Narrative in Health Communication , 2008 .

[11]  Joel J. Davis The Effects of Message Framing on Response to Environmental Communications , 1995 .

[12]  Lijiang Shen,et al.  Testing Moderators of Message Framing Effect , 2015, Commun. Res..

[13]  James A. Shepperd,et al.  Exploring the causes of comparative optimism. , 2002 .

[14]  Gergana Y. Nenkov,et al.  Knowing What It Makes: How Product Transformation Salience Increases Recycling , 2019, Journal of Marketing.

[15]  K. White,et al.  It's the Mind-Set that Matters: The Role of Construal Level and Message Framing in Influencing Consumer Efficacy and Conservation Behaviors , 2011 .

[16]  E. Weber,et al.  A Domain-Specific Risk-Attitude Scale: Measuring Risk Perceptions and Risk Behaviors , 2002 .

[17]  Eun-Ju Lee,et al.  Effects of infographics on news elaboration, acquisition, and evaluation: Prior knowledge and issue involvement as moderators , 2015, New Media Soc..

[18]  Sabine Pahl,et al.  Comparative optimism for environmental risks , 2005 .

[19]  Neil D. Weinstein,et al.  Unrealistic optimism about susceptibility to health problems , 1982, Journal of Behavioral Medicine.

[20]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[21]  Daniel J. O'Keefe,et al.  The Relative Persuasiveness of Gain-Framed and Loss-Framed Messages for Encouraging Disease Detection Behaviors: A Meta-Analytic Review , 2009 .

[22]  Thomas A. Morton,et al.  Communication and Health Beliefs , 2001, Commun. Res..

[23]  A. Leiserowitz Climate Change Risk Perception and Policy Preferences: The Role of Affect, Imagery, and Values , 2006 .

[24]  N. Weinstein Unrealistic optimism about future life events , 1980 .

[25]  Michael D. Buhrmester,et al.  Amazon's Mechanical Turk , 2011, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[26]  Sukki Yoon,et al.  Assertive Environmental Advertising and Reactance: Differences Between South Koreans and Americans , 2017 .

[27]  G. Huylenbroeck,et al.  The importance of message framing for providing information about sustainability and environmental aspects of energy , 2010 .

[28]  R. Hornik,et al.  Effects of Framing Health Messages in Terms of Benefits to Loved Ones or Others: An Experimental Study , 2016, Health communication.

[29]  L. Perloff,et al.  Self–other judgments and perceived vulnerability to victimization. , 1986 .

[30]  Anastasios Pagiaslis,et al.  Green Consumption Behavior Antecedents: Environmental Concern, Knowledge, and Beliefs , 2014 .

[31]  Ilwoo Ju,et al.  Prescription drug advertising, disease knowledge, and older adults’ optimistic bias about the future risk of alzheimer’s disease , 2016, Health communication.

[32]  Krista Casler,et al.  Separate but equal? A comparison of participants and data gathered via Amazon's MTurk, social media, and face-to-face behavioral testing , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[33]  Ran Wei,et al.  Reconsidering the Relationship Between the Third-Person Perception and Optimistic Bias , 2007, Commun. Res..

[34]  R. E. Burnkrant,et al.  Effects of Self-Referencing on Persuasion , 1995 .

[35]  S. Noar,et al.  Message design approaches to health risk behavior prevention. , 2015 .

[36]  W. Klein,et al.  Unrealistic Optimism: Present and Future , 1996 .

[37]  Weirui Wang,et al.  The Effects of Gain Versus Loss Message Framing and Point of Reference on Consumer Responses to Green Advertising , 2015 .

[38]  Daniel J. O'Keefe,et al.  The Relative Persuasiveness of Gain- and Loss-Framed Messages for Promoting Vaccination: A Meta-Analytic Review , 2012, Health communication.

[39]  Jakob D. Jensen,et al.  The Relative Persuasiveness of Gain-Framed Loss-Framed Messages for Encouraging Disease Prevention Behaviors: A Meta-Analytic Review , 2007, Journal of health communication.

[40]  A. Kühberger,et al.  The Influence of Framing on Risky Decisions: A Meta-analysis. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[41]  Werner Severin,et al.  Another look at cue summation , 1967 .

[42]  Richard Joiner,et al.  The typical student as an in‐group member: eliminating optimistic bias by reducing social distance , 2000 .

[43]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Effects of Perceptual Fluency on Affective Judgments , 1998 .

[44]  Sukki Yoon,et al.  When environmental messages should be assertive: examining the moderating role of effort investment , 2015 .

[45]  Peggy Sue Loroz The interaction of message frames and reference points in prosocial persuasive appeals , 2007 .

[46]  S. Bamberg How does environmental concern influence specific environmentally related behaviors? A new answer to an old question , 2003 .

[47]  Hye Jin Yoon,et al.  Saving Behavior Messaging: Gain/Loss Framing, Self/Family Orientations, and Individual Differences in Collectivism , 2018 .

[48]  D. O’Keefe,et al.  Gain-Framed Messages Do Not Motivate Sun Protection: A Meta-Analytic Review of Randomized Trials Comparing Gain-Framed and Loss-Framed Appeals for Promoting Skin Cancer Prevention , 2012, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[49]  Sela Sar,et al.  In the mood for [the right kind of] social marketing communication: How congruity between consumer mood and message framing influences intentions to recycle , 2014 .

[50]  Eric Haley,et al.  Exploring the Construct of Organization as Source: Consumers' Understandings of Organizational Sponsorship of Advocacy Advertising , 1996 .

[51]  L. V. Casaló,et al.  Intergenerational association of environmental concern: Evidence of parents' and children's concern , 2016 .

[52]  Hichang Cho,et al.  Optimistic Bias About H1N1 Flu: Testing the Links Between Risk Communication, Optimistic Bias, and Self-Protection Behavior , 2013, Health communication.