The effect of temporal variations in rainfall on scale dependency in runoff coefficients

A series of numerical experiments was carried out to test the hypothesis that temporal variability of rainfall intensity during a storm can cause the commonly observed decrease in runoff coefficients with increasing slope length. The results demonstrate significant effects over even relatively short slope lengths. Sensitivity analyses show that the scale dependency of measured runoff coefficients is most sensitive to the infiltration parameters of the slope. Furthermore, it is also sensitive to the slope angle and the friction factor of the surface, because these parameters control the depth of overland flow. These results suggest that the combination of time‐varying rainfall intensity during an event and run‐on infiltration can provide an alternative to spatial variation in infiltration as an explanation for the scale‐dependency of runoff coefficients that has been observed in the field. Overland‐flow models which simply use the mean rainfall intensity are also shown to underpredict the runoff quite dramatically. The results imply that a better understanding of the temporal variability of rainfall intensities is important in both understanding field measurements and developing robust models of overland flow.

[1]  David G. Tarboton,et al.  Characteristic length scale of input data in distributed models: implications for modeling grid size , 2000 .

[2]  K. Keesman,et al.  Identifying scale‐dependent models: The case of overland flow at the hillslope scale , 2000 .

[3]  James P. Hughes,et al.  A spatiotemporal model for downscaling precipitation occurrence and amounts , 1999 .

[4]  L. Band,et al.  Continuous modeling of intermittent stormflows on a semi-arid agricultural catchment , 1999 .

[5]  Bruno Merz,et al.  Effects of spatial variability on the rainfall runoff process in a small loess catchment , 1998 .

[6]  John Wainwright,et al.  Distributed dynamic modelling of interrill overland flow , 1997 .

[7]  David Brandes,et al.  Runoff from a semiarid Ponderosa pine hillslope in New Mexico , 1997 .

[8]  Rattan Lal,et al.  Soil degradative effects of slope length and tillage methods on alfisols in Western Nigeria. I. Runoff, erosion and crop response , 1997 .

[9]  F. Melone,et al.  A unified model for infiltration and redistribution during complex rainfall patterns , 1997 .

[10]  P. E. O'connell,et al.  A Regionalised Neyman-Scott Model of Rainfall with Convective and Stratiform Cells , 1997 .

[11]  John Wainwright,et al.  Infiltration, runoff and erosion characteristics of agricultural land in extreme storm events, SE France , 1996 .

[12]  D. A. Woolhiser,et al.  Impact of small-scale spatial rainfall variability on runoff modeling , 1995 .

[13]  John Wainwright,et al.  On determining resistance to interrill overland flow , 1994 .

[14]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Similarity analysis of runoff generation processes in real-world catchments , 1994 .

[15]  John Wainwright,et al.  Resistance to overland flow on semiarid grassland and shrubland hillslopes, Walnut Gulch, southern Arizona , 1994 .

[16]  A. Parsons,et al.  Application Of A Dynamic Overland-Flow Hydraulic Model To A Semi-Arid Hillslope, Walnut Gulch, Arizona , 1992 .

[17]  T. Dunne,et al.  Effects of Rainfall, Vegetation, and Microtopography on Infiltration and Runoff , 1991 .

[18]  A. Parsons,et al.  Resistance to Overland Flow on Desert Pavement and Its Implications for Sediment Transport Modeling , 1991 .

[19]  Pierre Y. Julien,et al.  Similarity and length scale for spatially varied overland flow. , 1990 .

[20]  M. Bonell,et al.  The influence of scale of measurement on the spatial and temporal variability of the Philip infiltration parameters — An experimental study in an an Australian savannah woodland , 1988 .

[21]  G. Gifford,et al.  Spatial variability of infiltration rates on a semiarid seeded rangeland , 1987 .

[22]  P. Dubreuil.  Review of field observations of runoff generation in the tropics , 1985 .

[23]  A. Yair,et al.  Trends in runoff and erosion processes over an arid limestone hillside, northern Negev, Israel / Tendances d'écoulement et des processus d'érosion sur une pente de colline aride calcaire, Negev du nord, Israel , 1980 .

[24]  J. Parlange,et al.  A parameter‐efficient hydrologic infiltration model , 1978 .

[25]  A. Yair,et al.  Climate and surface properties: hydrological response of small arid and semi-arid watersheds , 2002 .

[26]  N. C. Van de Giesen,et al.  Scale effects of Hortonian overland flow and rainfall–runoff dynamics in a West African catena landscape , 2000 .

[27]  Anthony J. Parsons,et al.  Relation between infiltration and stone cover on a semiarid hillslope, southern Arizona , 1991 .

[28]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Spatial Heterogeneity and Scale in the Infiltration Response of Catchments , 1986 .

[29]  M. Sharma,et al.  Spatial variability of infiltration in a watershed , 1980 .