Some practical considerations in finite element-based digital image correlation

Abstract As an alternative to subset-based digital image correlation (DIC), finite element-based (FE-based) DIC method has gained increasing attention in the experimental mechanics community. However, the literature survey reveals that some important issues have not been well addressed in the published literatures. This work therefore aims to point out a few important considerations in the practical algorithm implementation of the FE-based DIC method, along with simple but effective solutions that can effectively tackle these issues. First, to better accommodate the possible intensity variations of the deformed images practically occurred in real experiments, a robust zero-mean normalized sum of squared difference criterion, instead of the commonly used sum of squared difference criterion, is introduced to quantify the similarity between reference and deformed elements in FE-based DIC. Second, to reduce the bias error induced by image noise and imperfect intensity interpolation, low-pass filtering of the speckle images with a 5×5 pixels Gaussian filter prior to correlation analysis, is presented. Third, to ensure the iterative calculation of FE-based DIC converges correctly and rapidly, an efficient subset-based DIC method, instead of simple integer-pixel displacement searching, is used to provide accurate initial guess of deformation for each calculation point. Also, the effects of various convergence criteria on the efficiency and accuracy of FE-based DIC are carefully examined, and a proper convergence criterion is recommended. The efficacy of these solutions is verified by numerical and real experiments. The results reveal that the improved FE-based DIC offers evident advantages over existing FE-based DIC method in terms of accuracy and efficiency.

[1]  B. Pan Recent Progress in Digital Image Correlation , 2011 .

[2]  Bing Pan,et al.  An Evaluation of Convergence Criteria for Digital Image Correlation Using Inverse Compositional Gauss–Newton Algorithm , 2014 .

[3]  G. Vendroux,et al.  Submicron deformation field measurements: Part 2. Improved digital image correlation , 1998 .

[4]  M. Boltežar,et al.  Absolute Nodal Coordinates in Digital Image Correlation , 2013 .

[5]  Zhaoyang Wang,et al.  Equivalence of digital image correlation criteria for pattern matching. , 2010, Applied optics.

[6]  Bing Pan,et al.  High-Accuracy 2D Digital Image Correlation Measurements with Bilateral Telecentric Lenses: Error Analysis and Experimental Verification , 2013 .

[7]  Wei Tong,et al.  Fast, Robust and Accurate Digital Image Correlation Calculation Without Redundant Computations , 2013, Experimental Mechanics.

[8]  M. A. Mohtadi-Bonab,et al.  In-situ strain localization analysis in low density transformation-twinning induced plasticity steel using digital image correlation , 2015 .

[9]  S. Roux,et al.  “Finite-Element” Displacement Fields Analysis from Digital Images: Application to Portevin–Le Châtelier Bands , 2006 .

[10]  Reng-cai Yang,et al.  A regularized finite-element digital image correlation for irregular displacement field , 2014 .

[11]  H. Lu,et al.  Deformation measurements by digital image correlation: Implementation of a second-order displacement gradient , 2000 .

[12]  Pengxiang Bai,et al.  Measurement of true stress–strain curves and evolution of plastic zone of low carbon steel under uniaxial tension using digital image correlation , 2015 .

[13]  Jinlong Chen,et al.  Deformation measurement across crack using two-step extended digital image correlation method , 2010 .

[14]  Long Tian,et al.  Superfast robust digital image correlation analysis with parallel computing , 2015 .

[15]  Zhenyu Jiang,et al.  Path-independent digital image correlation with high accuracy, speed and robustness , 2015 .

[16]  Bing Pan,et al.  Bias error reduction of digital image correlation using Gaussian pre-filtering , 2013 .

[17]  M. Sutton,et al.  Systematic errors in digital image correlation due to undermatched subset shape functions , 2002 .

[18]  Hubert W. Schreier,et al.  Image Correlation for Shape, Motion and Deformation Measurements: Basic Concepts,Theory and Applications , 2009 .

[19]  Bing Pan,et al.  Comparison of Subset-Based Local and Finite Element-Based Global Digital Image Correlation , 2015 .

[20]  M. Sutton,et al.  Full-field speckle pattern image correlation with B-Spline deformation function , 2002 .

[21]  Anand Asundi,et al.  Two-dimensional digital image correlation for in-plane displacement and strain measurement: a review , 2009 .

[22]  W. Tong An Evaluation of Digital Image Correlation Criteria for Strain Mapping Applications , 2005 .

[23]  Xie Huimin,et al.  Performance of sub-pixel registration algorithms in digital image correlation , 2006 .

[24]  K. Qian,et al.  Study on subset size selection in digital image correlation for speckle patterns. , 2008, Optics express.

[25]  Hugh Alan Bruck,et al.  Digital image correlation using Newton-Raphson method of partial differential correction , 1989 .

[26]  Kai Li,et al.  A fast digital image correlation method for deformation measurement , 2011 .

[27]  Julien Réthoré,et al.  On the Use of NURBS Functions for Displacement Derivatives Measurement by Digital Image Correlation , 2010 .

[28]  Bing Pan,et al.  Reliability-guided digital image correlation for image deformation measurement. , 2009, Applied optics.

[29]  Shaopeng Ma,et al.  Mesh-based digital image correlation method using higher order isoparametric elements , 2012 .

[30]  Yaofeng Sun,et al.  Finite element formulation for a digital image correlation method. , 2005, Applied optics.

[31]  Jubing Chen,et al.  Image pre-filtering for measurement error reduction in digital image correlation , 2015 .

[32]  Stéphane Roux,et al.  From pictures to extended finite elements: extended digital image correlation (X-DIC) , 2007 .