Motorcyclist injury risk as a function of real-life crash speed and other contributing factors.

The Vision Zero approach advocates for a road transport system designed with human injury tolerance and human fallibility as its basis. While biomechanical limits and the relationship between speed and injury outcome has been extensively investigated for car occupants and pedestrians, research analyzing this relationship for motorcyclists remains limited. The aim of this study was to address this issue by developing multivariate injury risk models for motorcyclists that estimate the relationship between speed and injury severity. For that purpose, motorcycle injury crashes from the German In-Depth Accident Study (GIDAS) database for the period 1999-2017 (n = 1037) were extracted. Different models were tested using logistic regression and backwards elimination of non-significant variables. The best fitting model in the current study included relative speed, type of crash opponent, impact location on the motorcycle and impact mechanism of the rider during the crash. A strong and significant relationship between relative speed and injury severity in motorcycle crashes was demonstrated. At 70 km/h, the risk for at least serious injuries in collisions with wide objects, crash barriers and narrow objects was 20%, 51%, and 64%, respectively. Further, it was found that head-on collisions between motorcycles and passenger cars, with both vehicles traveling at 60 km/h (a relative speed at 120 km/h), present 55% risk of at least serious injury to the motorcycle rider. More research is needed to fully understand the boundary conditions needed to design a safe road transport system for motorcyclists. However, this study provides important insights into the relationship between speed and injury severity for riders in various crash situations. The results may be useful in the discussion of appropriate speed limits and in determining the benefits of countermeasures which aim to reduce crash speed.

[1]  Julie Brown,et al.  Pelvic injury mechanisms among motorcyclists , 2014 .

[2]  Dominique Lord,et al.  The statistical analysis of highway crash-injury severities: a review and assessment of methodological alternatives. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  Li Li,et al.  A Study on Motor-Scooter Accidents in China and Germany , 2013, 2013 Fifth International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation.

[4]  Brian C Tefft,et al.  Impact speed and a pedestrian's risk of severe injury or death. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  Matteo Rizzi.  Can a Boxer Engine Reduce Leg Injuries Among Motorcyclists? Analysis of Injury Distributions in Crashes Involving Different Motorcycles Fitted with Antilock Brakes (ABS) , 2015, Traffic injury prevention.

[6]  Hampton C. Gabler,et al.  The Risk of Fatality in Motorcycle Crashes with Roadside Barriers , 2007 .

[7]  P C Noordzij,et al.  INTEGRATION OF NEEDS OF MOPED AND MOTORCYCLE RIDERS INTO SAFETY MEASURES: REVIEW AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS IN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE EUROPEAN RESEARCH PROJECT PROMISING, WORKPACKAGE 3 , 2001 .

[8]  D. Sperling,et al.  Two Billion Cars: Driving Toward Sustainability , 2008 .

[9]  Thomas A Gennarelli,et al.  AIS 2005: a contemporary injury scale. , 2006, Injury.

[10]  Dietmar Otte,et al.  Injury protection and accident causation parameters for vulnerable road users based on German In-Depth Accident Study GIDAS. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[11]  Michael Fitzharris,et al.  Motorcycle protective clothing: protection from injury or just the weather? , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  Christian Krettek,et al.  SCIENTIFIC APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY OF A NEW IN-DEPTH INVESTIGATION STUDY IN GERMANY CALLED GIDAS , 2003 .

[13]  David R. Thom,et al.  MOTORCYCLE ACCIDENT CAUSE FACTORS AND IDENTIFICATION OF COUNTERMEASURES. VOLUME I: TECHNICAL REPORT , 1981 .

[14]  Anders Kullgren,et al.  The combined benefits of motorcycle antilock braking systems (ABS) in preventing crashes and reducing crash severity , 2016, Traffic injury prevention.

[15]  S. Boufous,et al.  Helmets for preventing injury in motorcycle riders. , 2008, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[16]  Marco Pierini,et al.  Further Development of Motorcycle Autonomous Emergency Braking (MAEB), What Can In-Depth Studies Tell Us? A Multinational Study , 2014, Traffic injury prevention.

[17]  T Hell,et al.  Typical injury patterns of motorcyclists in different crash types: effectiveness and improvements of countermeasures , 1993 .

[18]  A Lie,et al.  Effectiveness of low speed autonomous emergency braking in real-world rear-end crashes. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[19]  Carolyn E Hampton,et al.  Influence of the missing vehicle and cdc only delta-v reconstruction algorithms for prediction of occupant injury risk - biomed 2009. , 2009, Biomedical sciences instrumentation.

[20]  D. Otte.  Technical Parameters for Determination of Impact Speed for Motorcycle Accidents and the Importance of Relative Speed on Injury Severity , 2006 .

[21]  M Fitzharris,et al.  Effectiveness of motorcycle protective clothing: riders' health outcomes in the six months following a crash. , 2012, Injury.

[22]  Claes Tingvall,et al.  Motorcycle Crashes into Road Barriers: the Role of Stability and Different Types of Barriers for Injury Outcome , 2012 .

[23]  Scott A. Shappell,et al.  A HUMAN ERROR APPROACH TO AVIATION ACCIDENT ANALYSIS , 2003 .

[24]  Rikard Fredriksson,et al.  A Real-Life Based Evaluation Method of Deployable Vulnerable Road User Protection Systems , 2014, Traffic injury prevention.

[25]  K. Rumar.  The Role of Perceptual and Cognitive Filters in Observed Behavior , 1985 .

[26]  Allison Daniello,et al.  Fatality risk in motorcycle collisions with roadside objects in the United States. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[27]  Ross A Blackman,et al.  Comparison of moped, scooter and motorcycle crash risk and crash severity. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[28]  Helena Stigson,et al.  Literature review of pedestrian fatality risk as a function of car impact speed. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[29]  Rikard Fredriksson,et al.  Powered Two-Wheeler Accidents in Germany with Severe Injury Outcome - Accident Scenarios, Injury - Sources and Potential Countermeasures , 2016 .

[30]  Rikard Fredriksson,et al.  Fatal Powered Two‐Wheeler (PTW) Crashes in Germany–An In‐depth Study of the Events, Injuries and Injury Sources , 2015 .

[31]  David C Viano,et al.  Injury Risks in Frontal Crashes by Delta V and Body Region With Focus on Head Injuries in Low-Speed Collisions , 2010, Traffic injury prevention.

[32]  George Yannis,et al.  Improving Safety for Motorcycle, Scooter and Moped Riders , 2015 .

[33]  Thomas Jonsson,et al.  Relative fatality risk curve to describe the effect of change in the impact speed on fatality risk of pedestrians struck by a motor vehicle. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[34]  Charles E. McCulloch,et al.  Regression Methods in Biostatistics: Linear, Logistic, Survival, and Repeated Measures Models , 2005 .

[35]  Joel D Stitzel,et al.  Estimated Injury Risk for Specific Injuries and Body Regions in Frontal Motor Vehicle Crashes , 2015, Traffic injury prevention.

[36]  Lekshmi Sasidharan,et al.  Crash sequence based risk matrix for motorcycle crashes. , 2018, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[37]  Hampton C. Gabler,et al.  Injury mitigation in the collision partners of pre-collision system equipped vehicles in rear-end collisions , 2011, 2011 14th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[38]  D Otte,et al.  Possibilities for load reductions using garment leg protectors for motorcyclists -- a technical, medical and biomechanical approach. , 2002, Annual proceedings. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine.