Waterpipe tobacco products: nicotine labelling versus nicotine delivery

Background Waterpipe tobacco package labelling typically indicates “0.0% tar” and “0.05% or 0.5% nicotine”. Objective To determine the extent to which nicotine labeling is related to nicotine delivery. Methods 110 waterpipe smokers engaged in a 45-minute waterpipe smoking session. Puff topography and plasma nicotine were measured. Three waterpipe tobacco brands were used: Nakhla (0.5% nicotine), Starbuzz (0.05% nicotine), and Al Fakher (0.05% nicotine). Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA. Results Topography did not differ across brands. Peak plasma nicotine varied significantly across brands. Al Fakher had the highest nicotine delivery (11.4 ng/ml) followed by Nakhla (9.8 ng/ml) and Starbuzz (5.8 ng/ml). Conclusions Nicotine labelling on waterpipe tobacco products does not reflect delivery; smoking a brand with a “0.05% nicotine” label led to greater plasma nicotine levels than smoking a brand with a “0.5% nicotine” label. Waterpipe tobacco products should be labelled in a manner that does not mislead consumers.

[1]  Paul Aveyard,et al.  Canadian and English students' beliefs about waterpipe smoking: a qualitative study , 2009, BMC public health.

[2]  Thomas Eissenberg,et al.  Waterpipe tobacco and cigarette smoking: direct comparison of toxicant exposure. , 2009, American journal of preventive medicine.

[3]  W. Maziak,et al.  Characteristics of U.S. waterpipe users: a preliminary report. , 2007, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[4]  Alan Shihadeh,et al.  Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, "tar", and nicotine in the mainstream smoke aerosol of the narghile water pipe. , 2005, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[5]  A. Breland,et al.  Clinical laboratory evaluation of potential reduced exposure products for smokers. , 2006, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[6]  A. Shihadeh.  Investigation of mainstream smoke aerosol of the argileh water pipe. , 2003, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[7]  J. Stockman,et al.  Waterpipe Tobacco Smoking on a U.S. College Campus: Prevalence and Correlates , 2010 .

[8]  W. Maziak,et al.  A pleasure among friends: how narghile (waterpipe) smoking differs from cigarette smoking in Syria , 2008, Tobacco Control.

[9]  S. Gueorgiev,et al.  Developing a System for Prognosis of Tar and Nicotine in Cigarette Smoke , 1999 .

[10]  R. Nakkash,et al.  Health warning labelling practices on narghile (shisha, hookah) waterpipe tobacco products and related accessories , 2010, Tobacco Control.

[11]  W. Maziak,et al.  Waterpipe tobacco smoking: knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and behavior in two U.S. samples. , 2008, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[12]  Thomas Eissenberg,et al.  Waterpipe tobacco smoking and cigarette smoking: a direct comparison of toxicant exposure and subjective effects. , 2011, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[13]  N. Saliba,et al.  Volatile aldehydes in the mainstream smoke of the narghile waterpipe. , 2008, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[14]  Thomas Eissenberg,et al.  Acute effects of waterpipe tobacco smoking: a double-blind, placebo-control study. , 2011, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[15]  Karem H Alzoubi,et al.  Assessment of genotoxicity of waterpipe and cigarette smoking in lymphocytes using the sister‐chromatid exchange assay: A comparative study , 2011, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[16]  N. Saliba,et al.  Measurement of 16 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in narghile waterpipe tobacco smoke. , 2008, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[17]  K. Chaouachi,et al.  A critique of the WHO TobReg's "Advisory Note" report entitled: "Waterpipe tobacco smoking: health effects, research needs and recommended actions by regulators" , 2006, Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine.

[18]  E. Akl,et al.  Effects of water-pipe smoking on lung function: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2011, Chest.