An Algorithm for Predicting the Intelligibility of Speech Masked by Modulated Noise Maskers
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Torsten Dau,et al. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[2] R. Plomp,et al. Effect of reducing slow temporal modulations on speech reception. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[3] R Drullman,et al. Temporal envelope and fine structure cues for speech intelligibility. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[4] Frédéric E. Theunissen,et al. The Modulation Transfer Function for Speech Intelligibility , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[5] James M. Kates,et al. Objective Quality and Intelligibility Prediction for Users of Assistive Listening Devices: Advantages and limitations of existing tools , 2015, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.
[6] Jesper Jensen,et al. An Algorithm for Intelligibility Prediction of Time–Frequency Weighted Noisy Speech , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.
[7] J. H. Steiger. Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. , 1980 .
[8] Jesper Jensen,et al. Spectral Magnitude Minimum Mean-Square Error Estimation Using Binary and Continuous Gain Functions , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.
[9] James M. Kates,et al. The Hearing-Aid Speech Perception Index (HASPI) , 2014, Speech Commun..
[10] Shigeo Abe DrEng. Pattern Classification , 2001, Springer London.
[11] T Houtgast,et al. A physical method for measuring speech-transmission quality. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[12] Herman J. M. Steeneken,et al. Assessment for automatic speech recognition: II. NOISEX-92: A database and an experiment to study the effect of additive noise on speech recognition systems , 1993, Speech Commun..
[13] Torsten Dau,et al. Effects of manipulating the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio on speech intelligibility. , 2015, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[14] J. C. Steinberg,et al. Factors Governing the Intelligibility of Speech Sounds , 1945 .
[15] Jesper Jensen,et al. An evaluation of objective quality measures for speech intelligibility prediction , 2009, INTERSPEECH.
[16] Torsten Dau,et al. Speech Intelligibility Evaluation for Mobile Phones. , 2015 .
[17] James M Kates,et al. Comparing the information conveyed by envelope modulation for speech intelligibility, speech quality, and music quality. , 2015, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[18] Yonghong Yan,et al. Evaluation of objective intelligibility prediction measures for noise-reduced signals in mandarin , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).
[19] Daniel P. W. Ellis,et al. A simple correlation-based model of intelligibility for nonlinear speech enhancement and separation , 2009, 2009 17th European Signal Processing Conference.
[20] Raymond L. Goldsworthy,et al. Analysis of speech-based Speech Transmission Index methods with implications for nonlinear operations. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[21] W. M. Rabinowitz,et al. Standardization of a test of speech perception in noise. , 1979, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[22] B Kollmeier,et al. Speech intelligibility prediction in hearing-impaired listeners based on a psychoacoustically motivated perception model. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[23] Jesper Jensen,et al. Speech Intelligibility Prediction Based on Mutual Information , 2014, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.
[24] W. Dreschler,et al. ICRA noises: artificial noise signals with speech-like spectral and temporal properties for hearing instrument assessment. International Collegium for Rehabilitative Audiology. , 2001, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.
[25] Yi Hu,et al. Objective measures for predicting speech intelligibility in noisy conditions based on new band-importance functions. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[26] B Kollmeier,et al. The effect of multichannel dynamic compression on speech intelligibility. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[27] Nobutaka Ito,et al. The Diverse Environments Multi-channel Acoustic Noise Database (DEMAND): A database of multichannel environmental noise recordings , 2013 .
[28] Jonathan G. Fiscus,et al. DARPA TIMIT:: acoustic-phonetic continuous speech corpus CD-ROM, NIST speech disc 1-1.1 , 1993 .
[29] H. Gustafsson,et al. Masking of speech by amplitude-modulated noise. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[30] Rainer Martin,et al. Objective Intelligibility Measures Based on Mutual Information for Speech Subjected to Speech Enhancement Processing , 2014, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.
[31] James M Kates,et al. Coherence and the speech intelligibility index. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[32] R. Wilcox,et al. Comparing Dependent Correlations , 2008, The Journal of general psychology.
[33] R. Drullman. Temporal envelope and fine structure cues for speech intelligibility , 1994 .
[34] Deliang Wang,et al. Role of mask pattern in intelligibility of ideal binary-masked noisy speech. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[35] Martin Cooke,et al. A glimpsing model of speech perception in noise. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[36] E. J. Williams. The Comparison of Regression Variables , 1959 .
[37] DeLiang Wang,et al. Isolating the energetic component of speech-on-speech masking with ideal time-frequency segregation. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[38] Wouter A. Dreschler,et al. ICRA Noises: Artificial Noise Signals with Speech-like Spectral and Temporal Properties for Hearing Instrument Assessment: Ruidos ICRA: Señates de ruido artificial con espectro similar al habla y propiedades temporales para pruebas de instrumentos auditivos , 2001 .
[39] R. Plomp,et al. Effect of temporal envelope smearing on speech reception. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[40] Herman J. M. Steeneken,et al. Mutual dependence of the octave-band weights in predicting speech intelligibility , 1999, Speech Commun..
[41] K. S. Rhebergen,et al. A Speech Intelligibility Index-based approach to predict the speech reception threshold for sentences in fluctuating noise for normal-hearing listeners. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[42] B C Moore,et al. Speech reception thresholds in noise with and without spectral and temporal dips for hearing-impaired and normally hearing people. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[43] Carla Teixeira Lopes,et al. TIMIT Acoustic-Phonetic Continuous Speech Corpus , 2012 .
[44] B Hagerman,et al. Sentences for testing speech intelligibility in noise. , 1982, Scandinavian audiology.