Quantification of Head Movement Predictability and Implications for Suppression of Vestibular Input during Locomotion

Achieved motor movement can be estimated using both sensory and motor signals. The value of motor signals for estimating movement should depend critically on the stereotypy or predictability of the resulting actions. As predictability increases, motor signals become more reliable indicators of achieved movement, so weight attributed to sensory signals should decrease accordingly. Here we describe a method to quantify this predictability for head movement during human locomotion by measuring head motion with an inertial measurement unit (IMU), and calculating the variance explained by the mean movement over one stride, i.e., a metric similar to the coefficient of determination. Predictability exhibits differences across activities, being most predictable during running, and changes over the course of a stride, being least predictable around the time of heel-strike and toe-off. In addition to quantifying predictability, we relate this metric to sensory-motor weighting via a statistically optimal model based on two key assumptions: (1) average head movement provides a conservative estimate of the efference copy prediction, and (2) noise on sensory signals scales with signal magnitude. The model suggests that differences in predictability should lead to changes in the weight attributed to vestibular sensory signals for estimating head movement. In agreement with the model, prior research reports that vestibular perturbations have greatest impact at the time points and during activities where high vestibular weight is predicted. Thus, we propose a unified explanation for time-and activity-dependent modulation of vestibular effects that was lacking previously. Furthermore, the proposed predictability metric constitutes a convenient general method for quantifying any kind of kinematic variability. The probabilistic model is also general; it applies to any situation in which achieved movement is estimated from both motor signals and zero-mean sensory signals with signal-dependent noise.

[1]  Jessica X. Brooks,et al.  Neural Correlates of Sensory Prediction Errors in Monkeys: Evidence for Internal Models of Voluntary Self-Motion in the Cerebellum , 2014, The Cerebellum.

[2]  L. Liebovitch,et al.  "Fractal dynamics of human gait: stability of long-range correlations in stride interval fluctuations". , 1996, Journal of applied physiology.

[3]  T. Brandt,et al.  You are better off running than walking with acute vestibulopathy , 1999, The Lancet.

[4]  R. Sperry Neural basis of the spontaneous optokinetic response produced by visual inversion. , 1950, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[5]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Human sensitivity to vertical self-motion , 2013, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  B. E. Maki,et al.  Gait Changes in Older Adults: Predictors of Falls or Indicators of Fear? , 1997, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[7]  Kathleen E. Cullen,et al.  The neural encoding of self-generated and externally applied movement: implications for the perception of self-motion and spatial memory , 2014, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[8]  Hamish G MacDougall,et al.  Marching to the beat of the same drummer: the spontaneous tempo of human locomotion. , 2005, Journal of applied physiology.

[9]  K Matsuyama,et al.  Vestibulospinal and reticulospinal neuronal activity during locomotion in the intact cat. I. Walking on a level surface. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  A. Berthoz,et al.  Head stabilization during various locomotor tasks in humans , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  E. Holst,et al.  Das Reafferenzprinzip , 2004, Naturwissenschaften.

[12]  Romeo Chua,et al.  Muscle-specific modulation of vestibular reflexes with increased locomotor velocity and cadence. , 2013, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  J. Bloomberg,et al.  Identifying head-trunk and lower limb contributions to gaze stabilization during locomotion. , 2002, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[14]  P Devos,et al.  Statistical tools for clinical gait analysis. , 2004, Gait & posture.

[15]  Jefferson E. Roy,et al.  Dissociating Self-Generated from Passively Applied Head Motion: Neural Mechanisms in the Vestibular Nuclei , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  J. T. Inglis,et al.  When is vestibular information important during walking? , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  Navrag B. Singh,et al.  Kinematic measures for assessing gait stability in elderly individuals: a systematic review , 2011, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[18]  Peter J. Beek,et al.  Statistical precision and sensitivity of measures of dynamic gait stability , 2009, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[19]  Hans Straka,et al.  Spinal Efference Copy Signaling and Gaze Stabilization during Locomotion in Juvenile Xenopus Frogs , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  M. Ernst,et al.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion , 2002, Nature.

[21]  Thomas Brandt,et al.  Differential effects of vestibular stimulation on walking and running , 2000, Neuroreport.

[22]  R. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Acceleration patterns of the head and pelvis when walking on level and irregular surfaces. , 2003, Gait & posture.

[23]  H. Straka,et al.  Gaze Stabilization by Efference Copy Signaling without Sensory Feedback during Vertebrate Locomotion , 2012, Current Biology.

[24]  B. Cohen,et al.  Effects of walking velocity on vertical head and body movements during locomotion , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  Jaap H van Dieën,et al.  Sensitivity of trunk variability and stability measures to balance impairments induced by galvanic vestibular stimulation during gait. , 2011, Gait & posture.

[26]  Tom Chau,et al.  Managing variability in the summary and comparison of gait data , 2005, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[27]  Stefan Glasauer,et al.  Vestibular and cerebellar contribution to gaze optimality. , 2014, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[28]  W. M. King,et al.  Getting ahead of oneself: Anticipation and the vestibulo-ocular reflex , 2013, Neuroscience.

[29]  J. Demer,et al.  Human gaze stabilization during natural activities: translation, rotation, magnification, and target distance effects. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  R. Wurtz,et al.  A Pathway in Primate Brain for Internal Monitoring of Movements , 2002, Science.

[31]  M. Chacron,et al.  Statistics of the Vestibular Input Experienced during Natural Self-Motion: Implications for Neural Processing , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  Hans Straka,et al.  Predictability of visual perturbation during locomotion: implications for corrective efference copy signaling , 2012, Biological Cybernetics.

[33]  Rosalie M. Uchanski,et al.  Human discrimination of rotational velocities , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[34]  Jonathan B Dingwell,et al.  Differences between local and orbital dynamic stability during human walking. , 2007, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[35]  R. J. van Beers,et al.  Integration of proprioceptive and visual position-information: An experimentally supported model. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.