Adsorption of Sulfate and Phosphate on Andisols

This research studied the factors influencing the adsorption of phosphate and sulfate added alone or as a mixture on Andisols with different chemical, physico-chemical, and mineralogical properties and the desorption of sulfate (and phosphate) previously fixed on selected soil samples by increasing concentrations of phosphate (and sulfate). All the samples adsorbed amounts of phosphate 2–5 times greater than those of sulfate. By increasing pH, phosphate adsorption only slightly decreased, whereas sulfate retention decreased dramatically. At pH>5.5, sulfate sorption was usually very low or negligible. Allophanic materials increased the adsorption of the nutrients, whereas organic carbon and silicate prevented the adsorption of phosphate and especially of sulfate. When the anions were added as a mixture, sulfate adsorption was drastically decreased even in the presence of low amounts of phosphate (initial phosphate/sulfate molar ratio (R)≪1). A possible explanation of these findings is that phosphate adsorption on soil samples decreased their surface charge and point of zero charge (PZC), preventing the fixation of sulfate ions on more negative surfaces. Finally, pH strongly influenced the competition in adsorption between phosphate and sulfate; at pH values <4.5 sulfate competed with phosphate, probably forming inner-sphere complexes, and was able to replace some phosphate anions previously adsorbed on the surfaces of soil samples.

[1]  E. Nizeyimana,et al.  Allophane and Imogolite , 2018, Soil Mineralogy with Environmental Applications.

[2]  A. Violante,et al.  Influence of Organic Acids on Crystallization and Surface Properties of Precipitation Products of Aluminum , 2015 .

[3]  A. Violante,et al.  Competitive Sorption of Arsenate and Phosphate on Different Clay Minerals and Soils , 2002 .

[4]  P. Adamo,et al.  Tubular and spheroidal halloysite in pyroclastic deposits in the area of the Roccamonfina volcano (Southern Italy) , 2001 .

[5]  G. Krishnamurti,et al.  Impact of organic substances on the formation and transformation of metal oxides in soil environments. , 2001 .

[6]  Ji‐Zheng He,et al.  Competitive adsorption of sulfate and oxalate on goethite in the absence or presence of phosphate , 1999 .

[7]  L. Gianfreda,et al.  Sorption of phosphate and oxalate by a synthetic aluminium hydroxysulphate complex , 1996 .

[8]  J. Canales,et al.  Interactions of humic substances with allophanic compounds , 1995 .

[9]  R. Fox,et al.  Plant Nutrient Sulfur in The Tropics and Subtropics , 1993 .

[10]  N. Barrow The effect of time on the competition between anions for sorption , 1992 .

[11]  J. R. Kramer,et al.  SULFATE ION BINDING ON GOETHITE AND HEMATITE , 1991 .

[12]  D. Sparks,et al.  Kinetics and mechanisms of sulfate adsorption/desorption on goethite using pressure-jump relaxation. , 1990 .

[13]  R. Parfitt Allophane in New Zealand - a review , 1990 .

[14]  K. Wada,et al.  EFFECTS OF PHOSPHORUS CONCENTRATION AND pH ON PHOSPHATE RETENTION BY ACTIVE ALUMINUM AND IRON OF ANDO SOILS , 1981 .

[15]  D. Bouldin,et al.  SULFATE SORPTION BY TWO OXISOLS AND AN ALFISOL OF THE TROPICS1 , 1979 .

[16]  R. Parfitt Anion Adsorption by Soils and Soil Materials , 1979 .

[17]  L. Roger,et al.  Allophane and imogolite , 1978 .

[18]  E. Bornemisza,et al.  Sulfate Movement, Adsorption, and Desorption in Three Costa Rican Soils , 1967 .

[19]  M. Harward,et al.  Adsorption and desorption phenomena of sulfate ions in soils , 1962 .