Effects of different manuring systems with and without biogas digestion on nitrogen cycle and crop yield in mixed organic dairy farming systems

Field trials were carried out between 2002 and 2005 to investigate the effects of biogas digestion in a mixed organic dairy farming system with arable land and grassland on nutrient cycling, nitrogen (N) uptake and crop yields within a cropping system comprising a whole crop rotation. Five treatments were carried out: (i) solid farmyard manure, (ii) undigested liquid slurry, (iii) digested liquid slurry, (iv) digestion of liquid slurry and field residues such as crop residues and cover crops, and (v) similar to iv, but with additional N inputs at the equivalent of 40 kg N ha−1 farmland through digestion of purchased substrates. The term “manure” is used in the present study to mean all kind of aboveground organic residues left on the field (“immobile manures”, such as crop residues and green manures incorporated directly into the soil) or added as stable wastes or effluents of biogas digestion (“mobile manures”). The total aboveground biomass growth and the overall aboveground N uptake of non-legume maincrops were higher in the liquid slurry manure treatment than in the solid farmyard manure system (+5% and +9%, respectively). The digestion of the liquid slurry increased N uptake and crop yields only after soil incorporation of the slurry shortly after field spreading. The additional collection and digestion of field residues such as cover crops and crop residues, combined with a reallocation of the effluents, strongly increased the amounts of “mobile” manure, allowing a more focussed allocation of the available N. This led to an increase in the aboveground N uptake (+12%) and biomass yield (+4%) of the five non-legume crops, due to a better adapted allocation of nutrients in space and time. Results obtained with spring wheat showed that removal of cover crops in autumn, and their digestion, combined with subsequent use as manure in spring resulted in a better synchronisation of the crop N demand and the soil N availability, in comparison with a strategy where the biomass was left on the field as green (immobile) manure. The inclusion of external substrates led to a further increase of 8% in N uptake, but not to a significant increase in aboveground dry matter yields.

[1]  Monica Odlare,et al.  The fertilizing effect of compost and biogas residues from source separated household waste , 2004, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[2]  Walter Stinner,et al.  Effects of different manuring systems with and without biogas digestion on soil mineral nitrogen content and on gaseous nitrogen losses (ammonia, nitrous oxides) , 2009 .

[3]  Sven G. Sommer,et al.  Nitrogen and organic matter losses during storage of cattle and pig manure , 1998, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[4]  H. Søgaard,et al.  Ammonia volatilization from surface-applied livestock slurry as affected by slurry composition and slurry infiltration depth , 2006, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[5]  J. Petersen,et al.  Competition between weeds and spring wheat for 15N-labelled nitrogen applied in pig slurry , 2005 .

[6]  D. Massé,et al.  Particle Size Distribution and Characteristics of Raw and Anaerobically Digested Swine Manure Slurry , 2004 .

[7]  K. Möller,et al.  Impact and Interaction of Nitrogen and Phytophthora infestans as Yield-limiting and Yield-reducing Factors in Organic Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Crops , 2007, Potato Research.

[8]  N. Barrow.  Mineralization of nitrogen and sulphur from sheep faeces , 1961 .

[9]  G. Briemle,et al.  Unterschiedliche technische Behandlung von Gülle und deren Auswirkungen auf intensiv genutztes Dauergrünland , 1995 .

[10]  H. Schüller.  Die CAL-Methode, eine neue Methode zur Bestimmung des pflanzenverfügbaren Phosphates in Böden , 1969 .

[11]  L. S. Jensen,et al.  Catch crops and green manures as biological tools in nitrogen management in temperate zones , 2003 .

[12]  J. Schröder,et al.  Revisiting the agronomic benefits of manure: a correct assessment and exploitation of its fertilizer value spares the environment. , 2005, Bioresource technology.

[13]  S. Cuttle,et al.  Is the productivity of organic farms restricted by the supply of available nitrogen? , 2002 .

[14]  R. Gutser,et al.  Reducing N losses (NH3, N2o, N2) and immobilization from slurry through optimized application techniques , 2004, Fertilizer research.

[15]  P. Sørensen,et al.  Remineralisation and residual effects of N after application of pig slurry to soil , 2002 .

[16]  M. Bernal,et al.  Carbon and nitrogen mineralization and ammonia volatilization from fresh, aerobically and anaerobically treated pig manure during incubation with soil , 1992, Biology and Fertility of Soils.

[17]  Kurt Roos AgSTAR.  A Comparison of Dairy Cattle Manure Management with and without Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Utilization Submitted To : , 2003 .

[18]  T. Kätterer,et al.  Possibilities for Improving Nitrogen Use From Organic Materials in Agricultural Cropping Systems , 2005, Ambio.

[19]  T. Kätterer,et al.  Possibilities for improving nitrogen use from organic materials in agricultural cropping systems. , 2005 .

[20]  Richard Lambert,et al.  Estimating nitrogen losses from animal manures using their phosphorus balance. : p. 1 , 2003 .

[21]  D. J. Hatch,et al.  Controlling nitrogen flows and losses , 2004 .

[22]  U. Schmidhalter,et al.  Short-term and residual availability of nitrogen after long-term application of organic fertilizers on arable land , 2005 .

[23]  K. Rasmussen,et al.  Influence of liquid manure application method on weed control in spring cereals , 2002 .

[24]  R. B. Reneau,et al.  Fertilizer Recovery from Anaerobic Digesters , 1984 .

[25]  G. Torstensson.  NITROGEN DELIVERY AND UTILIZATION BY SUBSEQUENT CROPS AFTER INCORPORATION OF LEYS WITH DIFFERENT PLANT COMPOSITION , 1998 .

[26]  L. Sommers,et al.  Use of Waste Materials as Sources of Phosphorus , 2015 .

[27]  John E. Sawyer,et al.  Extractable Soil Phosphorus and Inorganic Nitrogen following Application of Raw and Anaerobically Digested Swine Manure , 2005 .

[28]  P. Sørensen,et al.  The use of 15N labelling to study the turnover and utilization of ruminant manure N , 1998, Biology and Fertility of Soils.

[29]  H. Kirchmann,et al.  Relationship between N immobilization and volatile fatty acids in soil after application of pig and cattle slurry , 1993, Biology and Fertility of Soils.

[30]  Weijun Zhou,et al.  THE FATE OF NITROGEN FROM 15N‐LABELED STRAW AND GREEN MANURE IN SOIL‐CROP‐DOMESTIC ANIMAL SYSTEMS , 1994 .

[31]  E. Witter,et al.  Composition of fresh, aerobic and anaerobic farm animal dungs , 1992 .

[32]  K. Möller,et al.  Growth, composition, biological N2 fixation and nutrient uptake of a leguminous cover crop mixture and the effect of their removal on field nitrogen balances and nitrate leaching risk , 2008, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems.

[33]  P. Dosch,et al.  Reducing N losses (NH3, N2o, N2) and immobilization from slurry through optimized application techniques , 2004, Fertilizer Research.

[34]  G.W.J. Giesen,et al.  CONVERSION FROM CONVENTIONAL TO BIOLOGICAL DAIRY FARMING: ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES AT FARM LEVEL , 1998 .

[35]  X. Pang,et al.  Organic farming: challenge of timing nitrogen availability to crop nitrogen requirements. , 2000 .

[36]  U. Hege,et al.  Effect of differentiated mineral fertilization and organic manuring on yield, product quality and N balances in the international permanent organic nitrogen experiment (IOSDV) Puch , 2006 .

[37]  T. Dewes,et al.  Sickersaft-Austrag und Stickstoff-Fracht aus Mistmieten , 1991 .

[38]  M. Bleken,et al.  Utilization of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) in an organic dairy farming system in Norway , 2004 .