The Role of Caregiver Involvement in Upper-Limb Treatment in Individuals With Subacute Stroke

Background Initial severity of upper-limb motor impairment and exercise intensity are important predictors of improved upper-limb function during stroke rehabilitation. Initial severity of motor impairment, however, is not modifiable by rehabilitation, and increased one-on-one treatment is not always feasible. Alternative methods to increase intensity and improve upper-limb function are needed. Objective The purpose of this study was to examine caregiver involvement in upper-limb treatment as a method to improve upper-limb function. Design This study was a secondary analysis of a multi-site randomized controlled trial for upper-limb recovery during subacute inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Methods Data from 50 individuals with subacute stroke who were randomly assigned to the experimental group (upper-limb exercise) were used for the analysis. Outcome variables were measured at baseline and at completion of the 4-week intervention. Group comparisons between participants with caregiver support and participants without caregiver support were done using an analysis of variance. Using the Fugl-Meyer Upper-Limb Motor Impairment Scale and time spent in treatment (intensity) as covariates, a multivariate regression analysis was performed to determine the additive value of caregiver support on upper-limb function, as measured by change scores on the Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory and the Motor Activity Log. Results Group comparisons revealed that participants with caregiver support had improved upper-limb function compared with those without caregiver support and were more likely to increase the amount of time spent doing exercise. The multiple regression analysis showed that Fugl-Meyer score, treatment intensity, and caregiver support were significant predictors of upper-limb improvement (R2=.240–.292). In the regression models, caregiver support accounted for 5% to 9% of upper-limb improvement. Limitations Support was coded as a dichotomous variable, and thus the degree of support or qualitative nature of support was not captured. Conclusions Involvement of caregivers was a determinant of improved upper-limb function over and above initial severity of motor impairment and exercise intensity. Further research is needed to determine the optimal qualitative and quantitative elements of caregiver involvement in stroke rehabilitation in order to maximize results.

[1]  W. Miller,et al.  A Self-Administered Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program (GRASP) Improves Arm Function During Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation: A Multi-Site Randomized Controlled Trial , 2009, Stroke.

[2]  Tara Cusack,et al.  To what extent are family members and friends involved in physiotherapy and the delivery of exercises to people with stroke? , 2009, Disability and rehabilitation.

[3]  Stanley Jones,et al.  Relation between post-stroke satisfaction with time use, perceived social support and depressive symptoms , 2009, Disability and rehabilitation.

[4]  T. Kendrick,et al.  Formal support of stroke survivors and their informal carers in the community: a cohort study. , 2008, Health & social care in the community.

[5]  Brendan Murphy,et al.  The Impact of Increased Duration of Exercise Therapy on Functional Recovery Following Stroke — What Is the Evidence? , 2008, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[6]  C. Nowinski,et al.  A qualitative study of quality of life after stroke: the importance of social relationships. , 2008, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[7]  Sarah F Tyson,et al.  Sensory Loss in Hospital-Admitted People With Stroke: Characteristics, Associated Factors, and Relationship With Function , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[8]  Keiji Hashimoto,et al.  Ability for Basic Movement as an Early Predictor of Functioning Related to Activities of Daily Living in Stroke Patients , 2007, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[9]  Denis Gravel,et al.  Reliability of maximal static strength measurements of the arms in subjects with hemiparesis , 2007, Clinical rehabilitation.

[10]  Nicola Smania,et al.  Active Finger Extension: A Simple Movement Predicting Recovery of Arm Function in Patients With Acute Stroke , 2007, Stroke.

[11]  Janice J Eng,et al.  Paretic Upper-Limb Strength Best Explains Arm Activity in People With Stroke , 2007, Physical Therapy.

[12]  Makoto Suzuki,et al.  Predicting recovery of upper-body dressing ability after stroke. , 2006, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[13]  S. Sahrmann,et al.  Relationships between Sensorimotor Impairments and Reaching Deficits in Acute Hemiparesis , 2006, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[14]  Paul W. Stratford,et al.  Validation of Three Shortened Versions of the Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory , 2006 .

[15]  E. Taub,et al.  Reliability and Validity of the Upper-Extremity Motor Activity Log-14 for Measuring Real-World Arm Use , 2005, Stroke.

[16]  Pamela W Duncan,et al.  Management of Adult Stroke Rehabilitation Care: a clinical practice guideline. , 2005, Stroke.

[17]  David L Streiner,et al.  Test-retest reliability, validity, and sensitivity of the Chedoke arm and hand activity inventory: a new measure of upper-limb function for survivors of stroke. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[18]  S. Brauer,et al.  Upper limb recovery after stroke: The stroke survivors' perspective , 2005, Disability and rehabilitation.

[19]  Peter Langhorne,et al.  Effects of Augmented Exercise Therapy Time After Stroke: A Meta-Analysis , 2004, Stroke.

[20]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what's the evidence? , 2004, Clinical rehabilitation.

[21]  O. Hardiman,et al.  Recovery of the upper limb post ischaemic stroke and the predictive value of the Orpington Prognostic Score , 2004, Clinical rehabilitation.

[22]  H. Vet,et al.  Clinimetric Properties of the Motor Activity Log for the Assessment of Arm Use in Hemiparetic Patients , 2004, Stroke.

[23]  L. Ada,et al.  Loss of strength contributes more to physical disability after stroke than loss of dexterity , 2004, Clinical rehabilitation.

[24]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Treatment Interventions for the Paretic Upper Limb of Stroke Survivors: A Critical Review , 2003, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[25]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. , 2003, Stroke.

[26]  Munehito Yoshida,et al.  Mobility and Muscle Strength Contralateral to Hemiplegia from Stroke: Benefit from Self-Training with Family Support , 2003, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[27]  C. Richards,et al.  Comparison of changes in upper and lower extremity impairments and disabilities after stroke , 2003, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[28]  R. Teasell,et al.  An Evidence-Based Review of Stroke Rehabilitation , 2003, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[29]  Philippa Clarke,et al.  Well-Being After Stroke in Canadian Seniors: Findings From the Canadian Study of Health and Aging , 2002, Stroke.

[30]  K. Vemmos,et al.  First-stroke recovery process: the role of family social support. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[31]  W De Weerdt,et al.  Predicting motor recovery of the upper limb after stroke rehabilitation: value of a clinical examination. , 2000, Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy.

[32]  D X Cifu,et al.  Factors affecting functional outcome after stroke: a critical review of rehabilitation interventions. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[33]  T. Olsen,et al.  Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[34]  N. C. Sharp,et al.  Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription , 1993 .

[35]  J. Haselkorn,et al.  THE FAMILY'S ROLE IN STROKE REHABILITATION: A Review of the Literature , 1992, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[36]  S. G. Nelson,et al.  Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor recovery following cerebrovascular accident. , 1983, Physical therapy.

[37]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[38]  S. Folstein,et al.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. , 1975, Journal of psychiatric research.

[39]  A. Fugl-Meyer,et al.  The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. , 1975, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.