Abstract The support of underground structures must be designed to withstand static overburden loads as well as seismic loads. New analytical solutions for a deep tunnel in a saturated poroelastic ground have been obtained for static and seismic loading. The static solution accounts for drainage and no-drainage conditions at the ground–liner interface. Linear elasticity of the liner and ground, and plane strain conditions at any cross-section of the tunnel are assumed. For tunnels in which ground stresses and pore pressures are applied far from the tunnel center, the drainage conditions at the ground–liner interface do not affect the stresses in the liner. The analytical solution shows that the stresses in the liner are exactly the same whether there is drainage or not at the ground–liner interface. Hence, if the drainage conditions in the tunnel are changed from full drainage to no-drainage or vice versa the stresses in the liner are not affected. However, the stresses and displacements in the ground change significantly from drainage to no-drainage conditions. For seismic loading a new analytical formulation is presented which provides the complete solution for the ground and the liner system for both dry and saturated ground conditions. The formulation is based on quasi-static seismic loading and elastic ground response; for a saturated ground, undrained conditions are assumed which indicate that the excess pore pressures generated during the seismic event do not dissipate. The results show that the racking deformations of a liner in dry or saturated ground are highly dependent on the flexibility of the liner.
[1]
Antonio Bobet,et al.
Analytical Solutions for Shallow Tunnels in Saturated Ground
,
2001
.
[2]
Nina N. Fotieva,et al.
Design of Tunnels Located Near Slopes in Seismic Areas
,
2001
.
[3]
R. Peck.
Deep excavations and tunnelling in soft ground
,
1969
.
[4]
Birger Schmidt,et al.
SEISMIC DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES
,
2001
.
[5]
C. M. St John,et al.
Aseismic design of underground structures
,
1987
.
[6]
Joseph Penzien,et al.
Seismically induced racking of tunnel linings
,
2000
.
[7]
In Mo Lee,et al.
The study of seepage forces acting on the tunnel lining and tunnel face in shallow tunnels
,
2001
.
[8]
Joseph Penzien,et al.
Stresses in linings of bored tunnels
,
1998
.
[9]
W. Flügge.
Stresses in Shells
,
1960
.
[10]
Herbert H. Einstein,et al.
Feasibility analysis for a radioactive waste repository tunnel
,
1998
.
[11]
George V. Aristorenas.
Time-dependent behavior of tunnels excavated in shale
,
1992
.
[12]
Hiroyasu Ohtsu,et al.
A study on problems associated with finite element excavation analysis by the stress‐flow coupled method
,
1999
.
[13]
Terry R. Howard.
Seismic Design of Embankments and Caverns
,
1983
.
[14]
Alfred J. Hendron,et al.
Dynamic and Static Design Considerations for Underground Chambers
,
1983
.
[15]
S. Timoshenko,et al.
Theory of elasticity
,
1975
.
[16]
H. Einstein,et al.
SIMPLIFIED ANALYSIS FOR TUNNEL SUPPORTS
,
1979
.