Comparison of structural design methods for railway composites and plastic sleepers and bearers

Abstract Railway sleepers are safety-critical and essential components in a ballasted railway track system. Sleepers could principally be made of different materials, such as, timber, steel, concrete, composite and plastic. The deterioration process of sleepers depends largely on the materials of which they are made. The most popular material for manufacturing sleepers nowadays is concrete. In very recent years, a new type of railway sleeper has been developed using composite and plastic materials. These plastic sleepers have been trialled as bridge transoms and, to a limited extent, as switch and crossing bearers. A limited application of composite (a combination of cement, steel and plastics) to bridge transoms can also be seen. At present, there is no unified design method or standard for these new plastic and composite sleepers and bearers. The lack of design information can compromise public safety. This paper thus highlights the design aspects for plastic and composite sleepers in comparison with traditional materials. It reveals that limit states design concept is the most optimal approach for sleeper design and manufacture. The insight will help rail asset owners and managers establish predictive and condition-based track design and maintenance.

[1]  Wahid Ferdous,et al.  Failures of mainline railway sleepers and suggested remedies – Review of current practice , 2014 .

[2]  Sakdirat Kaewunruen,et al.  Acoustic and Dynamic Characteristics of a Complex Urban Turnout Using Fibre-Reinforced Foamed Urethane (FFU) Bearers , 2015 .

[3]  Petr Procházka,et al.  Optimal shape design for minimum Lagrangian , 2009 .

[4]  Thiru Aravinthan,et al.  An investigation on the stiffness of timber sleepers for the design of fibre composite sleepers , 2008 .

[5]  Thiru Aravinthan,et al.  Composite railway sleepers - new developments and opportunities , 2015 .

[6]  Tomas Thierfelder,et al.  The creosote content of used railway crossties as compared with European stipulations for hazardous waste. , 2008, The Science of the total environment.

[7]  Sakdirat Kaewunruen,et al.  Methodologies for designing railway plastic and composite sleepers , 2017 .

[8]  Wim Van Paepegem,et al.  Fatigue damage modeling of fibre-reinforced composite materials: Review , 2001 .

[9]  Günther Koller FFU synthetic sleeper – Projects in Europe , 2015 .

[10]  M R Shiri,et al.  Experimental and numerical studies of longitudinal crack control for pre-stressed concrete sleepers , 2012 .

[11]  D Tensing,et al.  STUDY ON BEHAVIOUR OF COMPOSITE SLEEPERS , 2015 .

[12]  Takahisa Nakamura,et al.  Numerical method for evaluating the lateral resistance of sleepers in ballasted tracks , 2014 .

[13]  Sakdirat Kaewunruen,et al.  Performance and Durability of Concrete Structures in Railway Environment under Extreme Climate , 2018 .

[14]  Sakdirat Kaewunruen,et al.  An Alternative Rail Pad Tester for Measuring Dynamic Properties of Rail Pads Under Large Preloads , 2008 .

[15]  Thiru Aravinthan,et al.  A review of alternative materials for replacing existing timber sleepers , 2010 .

[16]  G. W. Quick,et al.  Microscopic Features of Cracked and Uncracked Concrete Railway Sleepers , 1992 .

[17]  Eric Mayer,et al.  Properties Of Concrete , 2016 .

[18]  Sakdirat Kaewunruen,et al.  Dynamic Responses of Interspersed Railway Tracks to Moving Train Loads , 2018 .

[19]  F. Rezaie,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of pre-stressed concrete sleepers for longitudinal crack prorogation effective factors , 2016 .

[20]  Joseph M. Sussman,et al.  Lifecycle Assessments of Railway Bridge Transitions Exposed to Extreme Climate Events , 2017, Front. Built Environ..

[21]  J. Clarke Structural design of polymer composites : EUROCOMP design code and handbook , 1996 .

[22]  Luis Ferreira,et al.  PREDICTION OF THE DEMAND OF THE RAILWAY SLEEPERS: A SIMULATION MODEL FOR REPLACEMENT STRATEGIES , 2003 .

[23]  Julio F. Davalos,et al.  Modeling and optimal design of composite-reinforced wood railroad crosstie , 1998 .

[24]  R. Bravo TRansiT CoopeRaTive ReseaRCh pRogRam , 2008 .

[25]  Sakdirat Kaewunruen,et al.  Limit states design of railway concrete sleepers , 2012 .

[26]  Joseph M. Sussman,et al.  Strategic framework to achieve carbon-efficient construction and maintenance of railway infrastructure systems , 2015, Front. Environ. Sci..

[27]  Michael Burrow,et al.  Reliability analysis and maintenance decision for railway sleepers using track condition information , 2007, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[28]  T. H. B. Reinforced Concrete , 1908, Nature.

[29]  Sakdirat Kaewunruen,et al.  Current state of practice in railway track vibration isolation: an Australian overview , 2016 .

[30]  Sakdirat Kaewunruen,et al.  Free vibrations of precast modular steel-concrete composite railway track slabs , 2017 .

[31]  Vicki P. McConnell Rail – an evolving market for FRP components , 2008 .

[32]  Sakdirat Kaewunruen,et al.  Experimental and numerical studies for evaluating dynamic behaviour of prestressed concrete sleepers subject to severe impact loading , 2007 .

[33]  Sakdirat Kaewunruen,et al.  Dynamic flexural influence on a railway concrete sleeper in track system due to a single wheel impact , 2009 .

[34]  Sakdirat Kaewunruen,et al.  Monitoring in-service performance of fibre-reinforced foamed urethane sleepers/bearers in railway urban turnout systems , 2014 .

[35]  Thiru Aravinthan,et al.  Composite railway sleepers – recent developments, challenges and future prospects , 2015 .

[36]  Joseph M. Sussman,et al.  Grand Challenges in Transportation and Transit Systems , 2016, Front. Built Environ..

[37]  Sakdirat Kaewunruen,et al.  Introducing a New Limit States Design Concept to Railway Concrete Sleepers: An Australian Experience , 2014, Front. Mater..

[38]  Br Hagaman,et al.  ROA Timber Sleeper Development Project , 1991 .

[40]  Sakdirat Kaewunruen,et al.  Monitoring structural deterioration of railway turnout systems via dynamic wheel/rail interaction , 2014 .

[41]  S. Kaewunruen Impact damage mechanism and mitigation by ballast bonding at railway bridge ends , 2014 .

[42]  Sakdirat Kaewunruen,et al.  Experimental simulation of the railway ballast by resilient materials and its verification by modal testing , 2008 .

[43]  Mohamed Abdallah El-Reedy Reliability-Based Design for Structures , 2018 .

[44]  Sakdirat Kaewunruen,et al.  Heavy rainfall and flood vulnerability of Singapore-Malaysia high speed rail system , 2016 .

[45]  Yasuto Fukada,et al.  The Mechanism of Railway Tracks , 2000 .

[46]  Sakdirat Kaewunruen,et al.  Reliability-based conversion of a structural design code for railway prestressed concrete sleepers , 2012 .

[47]  Sakdirat Kaewunruen,et al.  Briefing: Limit states design of railway concrete sleepers , 2012 .

[48]  Thiru Aravinthan,et al.  A review of optimization techniques used in the design of fibre composite structures for civil engineering applications , 2012 .

[49]  Sakdirat Kaewunruen,et al.  RESISTANCE OF RAILWAY CONCRETE SLEEPERS TO IMPACT LOADING , 2007 .

[50]  A. Furukawa,et al.  The estimation method of wheel load and lateral force using the axlebox acceleration 1 , 2022 .

[51]  J Leong,et al.  Probabilistic analysis of traintrack vertical impact forces , 2008 .

[52]  K. Krishnan Nair,et al.  Dynamic studies of railtrack sleepers in a track structure system , 2003 .