Cell–Cell Electrofusion: Optimization of Electric Field Amplitude and Hypotonic Treatment for Mouse Melanoma (B16-F1) and Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) Cells

Efficient electroporation of cells in physical contact induces cell fusion, and this process is known as electrofusion. It has been shown that appropriate hypotonic treatment of cells before the application of electric pulses can cause a significant increase in electrofusion efficiency. First, the amplitudes of the electric field were determined spectrofluorometrically, where sufficient permeabilization in hypotonic buffer occurred for B16-F1 and CHO cells. In further electrofusion experiments 14 ± 4% of fused cells for B16-F1 and 6 ± 1% for CHO was achieved. These electrofusion efficiencies, determined by double staining and fluorescence microcopy, are comparable to those of other published studies. It was also confirmed that successful electroporation does not necessarily guarantee high electrofusion efficiency due to biological factors involved in the electrofusion process. Furthermore, not only the extension of electrofusion but also cell survival depends on the cell line used. Further studies are needed to improve overall cell survival after electroporation in hypotonic buffer, which was significantly reduced, especially for B16-F1 cells. Another contribution of this report is the description of a simple modification of the adherence method for formation of spontaneous cell contact, while cells preserve their spherical shape.

[1]  J. Graham,et al.  Microvilli and cell swelling , 1976, Nature.

[2]  C. Morrow,et al.  Characterization of a circulating subpopulation of spontaneous antitetanus toxoid antibody producing B cells following in vivo booster immunization. , 1979, Journal of immunology.

[3]  J. Teissié,et al.  Electric pulse-induced fusion of 3T3 cells in monolayer culture. , 1982, Science.

[4]  U. Zimmermann,et al.  Electric field-mediated fusion and related electrical phenomena. , 1982, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[5]  J. Teissié,et al.  Direct experimental evidence of the vectorial character of the interaction between electric pulses and cells in cell electrofusion. , 1984, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta.

[6]  J. Teissié,et al.  Electrofusion. A new, highly efficient technique for generating somatic cell hybrids. , 1984, Experimental cell research.

[7]  U. Zimmermann,et al.  An improved electrofusion technique for production of mouse hybridoma cells , 1985, FEBS letters.

[8]  J. Teissié,et al.  Fusion of mammalian cells in culture is obtained by creating the contact between cells after their electropermeabilization. , 1986, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[9]  R. Gillies,et al.  Determination of cell number in monolayer cultures. , 1986, Analytical biochemistry.

[10]  J. Lucy,et al.  Osmotic forces in artificially induced cell fusion. , 1986, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[11]  A E Sowers,et al.  A long-lived fusogenic state is induced in erythrocyte ghosts by electric pulses , 1986, The Journal of cell biology.

[12]  V A Parsegian,et al.  Thermal-mechanical fluctuations enhance repulsion between bimolecular layers. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  K. James,et al.  Human monoclonal antibody production. Current status and future prospects. , 1987, Journal of immunological methods.

[14]  S. Abe,et al.  Effects of la on surface charges, dielectrophoresis, and electrofusion of barley protoplasts. , 1988, Plant physiology.

[15]  D. Stenger,et al.  Optimization of electrofusion parameters for efficient production of murine hybridomas. , 1988, Hybridoma.

[16]  U. Zimmermann,et al.  Enhanced hybridoma production by electrofusion in strongly hypo-osmolar solutions. , 1989, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[17]  Evidence that electrofusion yield is controlled by biologically relevant membrane factors. , 1989, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[18]  M. Rols,et al.  Cytoskeletal reorganization during electric-field-induced fusion of Chinese hamster ovary cells grown in monolayers. , 1989, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[19]  E. Neumann,et al.  Electroporation and Electrofusion in Cell Biology , 1989, Springer US.

[20]  M. Rols,et al.  Ionic-strength modulation of electrically induced permeabilization and associated fusion of mammalian cells. , 1989, European journal of biochemistry.

[21]  J. Peacock,et al.  Electropermeabilization and Electrosensitivity of Different Types of Mammalian Cells , 1989 .

[22]  Electrofusion of fibroblasts on the porous membrane. , 1990, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[23]  K. Kafadar,et al.  Development of microfusion techniques to generate human hybridomas. , 1990, Journal of immunological methods.

[24]  M. Rols,et al.  Modulation of electrically induced permeabilization and fusion of Chinese hamster ovary cells by osmotic pressure. , 1990, Biochemistry.

[25]  D. Chang,et al.  Reorganization of cytoplasmic structures during cell fusion. , 1991, Journal of cell science.

[26]  D. Chang,et al.  Guide to Electroporation and Electrofusion , 1991 .

[27]  D. Stenger,et al.  Dipole interactions in electrofusion. Contributions of membrane potential and effective dipole interaction pressures. , 1991, Biophysical journal.

[28]  M. Glassy,et al.  32 – Protocols of Electroporation and Electrofusion for Producing Human Hybridomas , 1991 .

[29]  R. A. Sjodin,et al.  Determination of electric field threshold for electrofusion of erythrocyte ghosts. Comparison of pulse-first and contact-first protocols. , 1992, Biophysical journal.

[30]  Zinc ions stimulate electrofusion of Hansenula polymorpha protoplasts , 1993 .

[31]  D. Zhelev,et al.  Electrical properties of cell pellets and cell electrofusion in a centrifuge. , 1993, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[32]  M. Jaroszeski,et al.  Mechanically facilitated cell-cell electrofusion. , 1994, Biophysical journal.

[33]  Cytometric detection and quantitation of cell-cell electrofusion products. , 1995, Methods in molecular biology.

[34]  Jac A. Nickoloff,et al.  Animal cell electroporation and electrofusion protocols , 1995 .

[35]  D. Zhelev,et al.  Experimental tests for protrusion and undulation pressures in phospholipid bilayers. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[36]  Tadej Kotnik,et al.  Sensitivity of transmembrane voltage induced by applied electric fields—A theoretical analysis , 1997 .

[37]  J Teissié,et al.  Control by osmotic pressure of voltage-induced permeabilization and gene transfer in mammalian cells. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[38]  J Teissié,et al.  Correlation between electric field pulse induced long-lived permeabilization and fusogenicity in cell membranes. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[39]  D. Miklavčič,et al.  Effect of Electric-Field Intensity on Electropermeabilization and Electrosensitmty of Various Tumor-Cell Lines In Vitro , 1998 .

[40]  Roland Bramlet,et al.  Electromanipulation of Cells , 1998 .

[41]  N. Urano,et al.  Effect of mitochondria on electrofusion of yeast protoplasts , 1998 .

[42]  T. McIntosh,et al.  Membrane fusion promoters and inhibitors have contrasting effects on lipid bilayer structure and undulations. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[43]  A. Dalgleish,et al.  Human tumour and dendritic cell hybrids generated by electrofusion: potential for cancer vaccines. , 2000, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[44]  P. Gessner,et al.  Electromanipulation of mammalian cells: fundamentals and application , 2000 .

[45]  H. Mekid,et al.  In vivo cell electrofusion , 2000, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects.

[46]  D. Kufe,et al.  Activation of antitumor cytotoxic T lymphocytes by fusions of human dendritic cells and breast carcinoma cells. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  D. Miklavčič,et al.  Cell electropermeabilization to small molecules in vitro: control by pulse parameters , 2001 .

[48]  J. Teissié,et al.  Cell hybridization by electrofusion on filters. , 2002, Analytical biochemistry.

[49]  A. Mackensen,et al.  Characterization of cells prepared by dendritic cell-tumor cell fusion. , 2002, Cancer immunity.

[50]  C. Rochlitz,et al.  Cell fusion: an approach to generating constitutively proliferating human tumor antigen-presenting cells , 2002, Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy.

[51]  Takashi Hayashi,et al.  Immunogenicity and therapeutic efficacy of dendritic-tumor hybrid cells generated by electrofusion. , 2002, Clinical immunology.

[52]  S. Novaković,et al.  Setting optimal parameters for in vitro electrotransfection of B16F1, SA1, LPB, SCK, L929 and CHO cells using predefined exponentially decaying electric pulses. , 2003, Bioelectrochemistry.

[53]  Quantification of cell hybridoma yields with confocal microscopy and flow cytometry. , 2004, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[54]  Y. Mizukami,et al.  Factors affecting the electrofusion efficiency ofPorphyra protoplasts , 1993, Journal of Applied Phycology.

[55]  J. Teissié,et al.  Osmotically induced membrane tension facilitates the triggering of living cell electropermeabilization. , 2004, Bioelectrochemistry.

[56]  S. Mantell,et al.  Comparative effects of fusion facilitators on electrofusion attributes of N. tabacum mesophyll protoplasts , 1995, Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture.

[57]  Vladimir L. Sukhorukov,et al.  Hypotonically induced changes in the plasma membrane of cultured mammalian cells , 1993, The Journal of Membrane Biology.

[58]  Hiroshi Tanaka,et al.  Tumor-dendritic cell fusion as a basis for cancer immunotherapy , 2004, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[59]  A. Steinbach,et al.  Surviving High-Intensity Field Pulses: Strategies for Improving Robustness and Performance of Electrotransfection and Electrofusion , 2005, The Journal of Membrane Biology.

[60]  P. Walden,et al.  Recruitment of helper T cells for induction of tumour rejection by cytolytic T lymphocytes , 1994, Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy.

[61]  Y. Okada,et al.  Electric pulse-induced fusion of mouse lymphoma cells: Roles of divalent cations and membrane lipid domains , 2005, The Journal of Membrane Biology.

[62]  Damijan Miklavčič,et al.  Cell membrane fluidity related to electroporation and resealing , 2006, European Biophysics Journal.

[63]  Heiko Zimmermann,et al.  A biophysical approach to the optimisation of dendritic-tumour cell electrofusion. , 2006, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[64]  Damijan Miklavčič,et al.  Electrochemotherapy – An easy, highly effective and safe treatment of cutaneous and subcutaneous metastases: Results of ESOPE (European Standard Operating Procedures of Electrochemotherapy) study , 2006 .

[65]  Chang Lu,et al.  Microfluidic cell fusion under continuous direct current voltage , 2006 .

[66]  S. Said-Fernández,et al.  Use of a colorimetric assay to measure differences in cytotoxicity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains. , 2007, Journal of medical microbiology.

[67]  Elizabeth H. Chen,et al.  Cell–cell fusion , 2007, FEBS letters.

[68]  Boris Rubinsky,et al.  Irreversible Electroporation: A New Ablation Modality — Clinical Implications , 2007, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[69]  I. H. Lambert Activation and inactivation of the volume-sensitive taurine leak pathway in NIH3T3 fibroblasts and Ehrlich Lettre ascites cells. , 2007, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[70]  Frances S. House,et al.  An optimized electrofusion-based protocol for generating virus-specific human monoclonal antibodies. , 2008, Journal of immunological methods.

[71]  H. McMahon,et al.  Mechanisms of membrane fusion: disparate players and common principles , 2008, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[72]  W. Sadee,et al.  Monitoring intracellular pH changes in response to osmotic stress and membrane transport activity using 5-chloromethylfluorescein , 2002, AAPS PharmSci.

[73]  M. Kreft,et al.  Monitoring lysosomal fusion in electrofused hybridoma cells. , 2008, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[74]  Damijan Miklavcic,et al.  Optimization of bulk cell electrofusion in vitro for production of human-mouse heterohybridoma cells. , 2008, Bioelectrochemistry.

[75]  L. Mir,et al.  Nucleic Acids Electrotransfer-Based Gene Therapy (Electrogenetherapy): Past, Current, and Future , 2009, Molecular biotechnology.

[76]  Marie-Pierre Rols,et al.  What is (Still not) Known of the Mechanism by Which Electroporation Mediates Gene Transfer and Expression in Cells and Tissues , 2009, Molecular biotechnology.

[77]  Saulius Satkauskas,et al.  Extent of cell electrofusion in vitro and in vivo is cell line dependent. , 2009, Anticancer research.

[78]  M. Kreft,et al.  Fused Late Endocytic Compartments and Immunostimulatory Capacity of Dendritic–Tumor Cell Hybridomas , 2009, Journal of Membrane Biology.

[79]  Damijan Miklavcic,et al.  A Time-Dependent Numerical Model of Transmembrane Voltage Inducement and Electroporation of Irregularly Shaped Cells , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[80]  D. Miklavčič,et al.  Cell size dynamics and viability of cells exposed to hypotonic treatment and electroporation for electrofusion optimization , 2009 .

[81]  Damijan Miklavcic,et al.  Numerical study of the electroporation pulse shape effect on molecular uptake of biological cells , 2010, Radiology and oncology.