On the voxel size and magnetic field strength dependence of spectral resolution in magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

While the inherent low sensitivity of in vivo MR spectroscopy motivated a trend towards higher magnetic fields, B(0), it has since become apparent that this increase does not seem to translate into the anticipated improvement in spectral resolution. This is attributed to the decrease of the transverse relaxation time, T(2)*, in vivo due to macro- and mesoscopic tissue susceptibility. Using spectral contrast-to-noise ratio (SCNR) arguments, we show that if in biological systems the linewidth (on the frequency scale) increases linearly with the field, the spectral resolution (in parts per million) improves approximately as the fifth-root of B(0) for chemically shifted lines and decreases as about B(0)(4/5) (in hertz) for a structure of J-coupled multiplets. It is also shown that for any given B(0) there is a unique voxel size that is optimal in spectral resolution, linking the spectral and spatial resolutions. Since in practical applications the spatial resolution may be dictated by the target anatomy, nomograms to determine the B(0) required to achieve the desired spectral resolution at that voxel size are presented. More generally, the scaling of the nomograms to determine the achievable spectral and spatial resolutions at any given field is described.

[1]  K R Thulborn Why neuroradiologists should consider very-high-field magnets for clinical applications of functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 1999, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[2]  K Uğurbil,et al.  Observation of resolved glucose signals in 1H NMR spectra of the human brain at 4 Tesla , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  K. Uğurbil,et al.  In vivo 1H NMR spectroscopy of the human brain at high magnetic fields: Metabolite quantification at 4T vs. 7T , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  R Gruetter,et al.  Automatic, localized in Vivo adjustment of all first‐and second‐order shim coils , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  A. Macovski Noise in MRI , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  T R Brown,et al.  A fast, reliable, automatic shimming procedure using 1H chemical-shift-imaging spectroscopy. , 1995, Journal of magnetic resonance. Series B.

[7]  V. Kiselev,et al.  Theory of susceptibility‐induced transverse relaxation in the capillary network in the diffusion narrowing regime , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  O. Gonen,et al.  SNR versus resolution in 3D 1H MRS of the human brain at high magnetic fields , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  K. Uğurbil,et al.  Ultrahigh field magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy. , 2003, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[10]  E. Haacke,et al.  Imaging iron stores in the brain using magnetic resonance imaging. , 2005, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[11]  Daniel K Sodickson,et al.  An introduction to coil array design for parallel MRI , 2006, NMR in biomedicine.

[12]  B. Mueller,et al.  Signal‐to‐noise ratio and spectral linewidth improvements between 1.5 and 7 Tesla in proton echo‐planar spectroscopic imaging , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  J. Babb,et al.  Field, coil, and echo-time influence on sensitivity and reproducibility of brain proton MR spectroscopy. , 2006, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[14]  G. Bodenhausen,et al.  Principles of nuclear magnetic resonance in one and two dimensions , 1987 .

[15]  P. Barker,et al.  Single‐voxel proton MRS of the human brain at 1.5T and 3.0T , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  Richard R. Ernst,et al.  The International Series of Monographs on Chemistry, Vol. 14: Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance in One and Two Dimensions , 1987 .

[17]  E Moser,et al.  Multivoxel 3D proton spectroscopy in the brain at 1.5 versus 3.0 T: signal-to-noise ratio and resolution comparison. , 2001, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[18]  R. Edelman,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging (2) , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  K Ugurbil,et al.  In vivo 1H NMR spectroscopy of the human brain at 7 T , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  K. Uğurbil,et al.  Resolution improvements in in vivo 1H NMR spectra with increased magnetic field strength. , 1998, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[21]  V. Kiselev Transverse relaxation effect of MRI contrast agents: A crucial issue for quantitative measurements of cerebral perfusion , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[22]  Yu-Chung N. Cheng,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Physical Principles and Sequence Design , 1999 .

[23]  D M Spielman,et al.  Optimal voxel size for measuring global gray and white matter proton metabolite concentrations using chemical shift imaging , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[24]  Ewald Moser,et al.  High‐resolution 3D proton spectroscopic imaging of the human brain at 3 T: SNR issues and application for anatomy‐matched voxel sizes , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[25]  S Li,et al.  Three‐dimensional mapping of the static magnetic field inside the human head , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[26]  C. Hardy,et al.  A review of 1H nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation in pathology: are T1 and T2 diagnostic? , 1987, Medical physics.

[27]  A. Roch,et al.  Relaxation induced by ferritin and ferritin‐like magnetic particles: The role of proton exchange , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[28]  E. Haacke,et al.  Theory of NMR signal behavior in magnetically inhomogeneous tissues: The static dephasing regime , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[29]  Josef Pfeuffer,et al.  Region and volume dependencies in spectral line width assessed by 1H 2D MR chemical shift imaging in the monkey brain at 7 T. , 2004, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[30]  H. Nyquist Thermal Agitation of Electric Charge in Conductors , 1928 .

[31]  K. Uğurbil,et al.  Magnetic field and tissue dependencies of human brain longitudinal 1H2O relaxation in vivo , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[32]  R. Gruetter,et al.  Methodology of1H NMR spectroscopy of the human brain at very high magnetic fields , 2005, Applied magnetic resonance.

[33]  D. Rothman,et al.  Improvements on an in Vivo automatic shimming method (FASTERMAP) , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[34]  C. Jack,et al.  Proton MR spectroscopy in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer disease: comparison of 1.5 and 3 T. , 2003, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.