Active inference, sensory attenuation and illusions

Active inference provides a simple and neurobiologically plausible account of how action and perception are coupled in producing (Bayes) optimal behaviour. This can be seen most easily as minimising prediction error: we can either change our predictions to explain sensory input through perception. Alternatively, we can actively change sensory input to fulfil our predictions. In active inference, this action is mediated by classical reflex arcs that minimise proprioceptive prediction error created by descending proprioceptive predictions. However, this creates a conflict between action and perception; in that, self-generated movements require predictions to override the sensory evidence that one is not actually moving. However, ignoring sensory evidence means that externally generated sensations will not be perceived. Conversely, attending to (proprioceptive and somatosensory) sensations enables the detection of externally generated events but precludes generation of actions. This conflict can be resolved by attenuating the precision of sensory evidence during movement or, equivalently, attending away from the consequences of self-made acts. We propose that this Bayes optimal withdrawal of precise sensory evidence during movement is the cause of psychophysical sensory attenuation. Furthermore, it explains the force-matching illusion and reproduces empirical results almost exactly. Finally, if attenuation is removed, the force-matching illusion disappears and false (delusional) inferences about agency emerge. This is important, given the negative correlation between sensory attenuation and delusional beliefs in normal subjects—and the reduction in the magnitude of the illusion in schizophrenia. Active inference therefore links the neuromodulatory optimisation of precision to sensory attenuation and illusory phenomena during the attribution of agency in normal subjects. It also provides a functional account of deficits in syndromes characterised by false inference and impaired movement—like schizophrenia and Parkinsonism—syndromes that implicate abnormal modulatory neurotransmission.

[1]  K. Cheng Theory of Superconductivity , 1948, Nature.

[2]  J. Lochner,et al.  Form of the Loudness Function in the Presence of Masking Noise , 1961 .

[3]  S. S. Stevens Power‐Group Transformations under Glare, Masking, and Recruitment , 1966 .

[4]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  Loudness functions under inhibition , 1967 .

[5]  S. S. Stevens Intensity functions in sensory systems. , 1967, International journal of neurology.

[6]  A. M. Richards Monaural loudness functions under masking. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  L. Weiskrantz,et al.  Preliminary Observations on Tickling Oneself , 1971, Nature.

[8]  E. Schafer,et al.  Self-stimulation alters human sensory brain responses. , 1974, Science.

[9]  G. Claxton Why Can't We Tickle Ourselves? , 1975, Perceptual and motor skills.

[10]  H. Haken Synergetics: an Introduction, Nonequilibrium Phase Transitions and Self-organization in Physics, Chemistry, and Biology , 1977 .

[11]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Gating of somatosensory evoked potentials during different kinds of movement in man. , 1981, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[12]  D Mumford,et al.  On the computational architecture of the neocortex. II. The role of cortico-cortical loops. , 1992, Biological cybernetics.

[13]  A. G. Feldman,et al.  The origin and use of positional frames of reference in motor control , 1995, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[14]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Anatomy of motor learning. I. Frontal cortex and attention to action. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[16]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  The Cerebellum Contributes to Somatosensory Cortical Activity during Self-Produced Tactile Stimulation , 1999, NeuroImage.

[17]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Predictive coding in the visual cortex: a functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects. , 1999 .

[18]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Spatio-Temporal Prediction Modulates the Perception of Self-Produced Stimuli , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  S. Blakemore,et al.  The perception of self-produced sensory stimuli in patients with auditory hallucinations and passivity experiences: evidence for a breakdown in self-monitoring , 2000, Psychological Medicine.

[20]  G. Curio,et al.  Speaking modifies voice‐evoked activity in the human auditory cortex , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[21]  D. Wolpert,et al.  The cerebellum is involved in predicting the sensory consequences of action , 1999, Neuroreport.

[22]  Sian L. Beilock,et al.  On the fragility of skilled performance: what governs choking under pressure? , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[23]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Motor prediction , 2001, Current Biology.

[24]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Abnormalities in the awareness of action , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  B. Chell,et al.  Manipulated Stress and Dispositional Reinvestment in a Wall-Volley Task: An Investigation into Controlled Processing , 2003, Perceptual and motor skills.

[26]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Two Eyes for an Eye: The Neuroscience of Force Escalation , 2003, Science.

[27]  C. E. Chapman,et al.  Sensory perception during movement in man , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  S. Gandevia,et al.  Reduction in perceived intensity of cutaneous stimuli during movement: a quantitative study , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[29]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Perceptual enhancement of contrast by attention , 2004 .

[30]  David Mumford,et al.  On the computational architecture of the neocortex , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[31]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Attention alters appearance , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[32]  R. Hari,et al.  Suppressed responses to self-triggered sounds in the human auditory cortex. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[33]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Attention Alters the Appearance of Spatial Frequency and Gap Size , 2005, Psychological science.

[34]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A theory of cortical responses , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[35]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Perception of the Consequences of Self-Action Is Temporally Tuned and Event Driven , 2005, Current Biology.

[36]  C. Frith The self in action: Lessons from delusions of control , 2005, Consciousness and Cognition.

[37]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Evidence for sensory prediction deficits in schizophrenia. , 2005, The American journal of psychiatry.

[38]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Sensorimotor attenuation by central motor command signals in the absence of movement , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[39]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Attenuation of Self-Generated Tactile Sensations Is Predictive, not Postdictive , 2006, PLoS biology.

[40]  J. Maxwell,et al.  Performance Breakdown in Sport , 2006, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[41]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Exogenous attention and color perception: Performance and appearance of saturation and hue , 2006, Vision Research.

[42]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Transient covert attention and the perceived rate of flicker. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[43]  D. Wolpert,et al.  An improvement in perception of self-generated tactile stimuli following theta-burst stimulation of primary motor cortex , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[44]  M. Turatto,et al.  Attention makes moving objects be perceived to move faster , 2007, Vision Research.

[45]  E. Schröger,et al.  Suppression of the auditory N1 event-related potential component with unpredictable self-initiated tones: evidence for internal forward models with dynamic stimulation. , 2008, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[46]  Karl J. Friston Hierarchical Models in the Brain , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[47]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Mere Expectation to Move Causes Attenuation of Sensory Signals , 2008, PloS one.

[48]  Atsushi Sato Action observation modulates auditory perception of the consequence of others’ actions , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.

[49]  Srikantan S. Nagarajan,et al.  Motor-induced Suppression of the Auditory Cortex , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[50]  M. Carrasco,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Voluntary Attention Enhances Contrast Appearance , 2022 .

[51]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Reinforcement Learning or Active Inference? , 2009, PloS one.

[52]  S. Kapur,et al.  The dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenia: version III--the final common pathway. , 2009, Schizophrenia bulletin.

[53]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Predictive coding under the free-energy principle , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[54]  E. Schröger,et al.  Attenuated human auditory middle latency response and evoked 40‐Hz response to self‐initiated sounds , 2009, The European journal of neuroscience.

[55]  Karl J. Friston The free-energy principle: a rough guide to the brain? , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[56]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Cortical circuits for perceptual inference , 2009, Neural Networks.

[57]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Attention, Uncertainty, and Free-Energy , 2010, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[58]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Action and behavior: a free-energy formulation , 2010, Biological Cybernetics.

[59]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Deficits in sensory prediction are related to delusional ideation in healthy individuals , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[60]  P. Mamassian,et al.  A New Look at Sensory Attenuation , 2010, Psychological science.

[61]  Jared Abrams,et al.  Voluntary attention increases perceived spatial frequency , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[62]  C. Spence,et al.  Juggling reveals a decisional component to tactile suppression , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[63]  P. Fletcher,et al.  Glutamatergic Model Psychoses: Prediction Error, Learning, and Inference , 2011, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[64]  E. Schröger,et al.  Selective suppression of self-initiated sounds in an auditory stream: An ERP study. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[65]  Florian Waszak,et al.  ERP correlates of action effect prediction and visual sensory attenuation in voluntary action , 2011, NeuroImage.

[66]  Carmen Weiss,et al.  The Self in Social Interactions: Sensory Attenuation of Auditory Action Effects Is Stronger in Interactions with Others , 2011, PloS one.

[67]  Carmen Weiss,et al.  The self in action effects: Selective attenuation of self-generated sounds , 2011, Cognition.

[68]  A. Therrien,et al.  Continuous theta-burst stimulation to primary motor cortex reduces the overproduction of forces following removal of visual feedback , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[69]  J. Maxwell,et al.  Neural co-activation as a yardstick of implicit motor learning and the propensity for conscious control of movement , 2011, Biological Psychology.

[70]  Simone Schütz-Bosbach,et al.  I Did It: Unconscious Expectation of Sensory Consequences Modulates the Experience of Self-agency and Its Functional Signature , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[71]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Predictions not commands: active inference in the motor system , 2012, Brain Structure and Function.

[72]  H. Wilquin,et al.  Motor Agency: A New and Highly Sensitive Measure to Reveal Agency Disturbances in Early Psychosis , 2012, PloS one.

[73]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A Bayesian account of ‘hysteria’ , 2012, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[74]  Andrea Desantis,et al.  Believing and Perceiving: Authorship Belief Modulates Sensory Attenuation , 2012, PloS one.

[75]  J. Tani,et al.  Spontaneous Prediction Error Generation in Schizophrenia , 2012, PloS one.

[76]  Mark R. Wilson,et al.  Conscious monitoring and control (reinvestment) in surgical performance under pressure , 2012, Surgical Endoscopy.

[77]  Raymond J. Dolan,et al.  Dopamine, Affordance and Active Inference , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[78]  C. Spence,et al.  Attention modulates sensory suppression during back movements , 2013, Consciousness and Cognition.

[79]  S. Xiong,et al.  A model for the perception of surface pressure on human foot. , 2013, Applied ergonomics.