Factors affecting allocation to needy and meritorious recipients: A cross-cultural comparison.

[1]  G. Leventhal,et al.  The Distribution of Rewards and Resources in Groups and Organizations , 1976 .

[2]  E. Sampson.  On Justice as Equality , 1975 .

[3]  H. Lamm,et al.  Preferences for an equal or equitable allocator. , 1977 .

[4]  Arnold S. Kahn,et al.  Sex of subject and sex composition of the group as determinants of reward allocations. , 1980 .

[5]  J. Greenberg,et al.  The Justice of Distributing Scarce and Abundant Resources , 1981 .

[6]  A. D. Souza.  Women in contemporary India , 1975 .

[7]  G. W. Walster,et al.  New directions in equity research. , 1973 .

[8]  M. Lerner.  The justice motive: Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms1 , 1977 .

[9]  G. Mikula.  Nationality, performance, and sex as determinants of reward allocation. , 1974 .

[10]  M. Deutsch.  Equity, Equality, and Need: What Determines Which Value Will Be Used as the Basis of Distributive Justice? , 1975 .

[11]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[12]  Gerold Mikula,et al.  Justice and Social Interaction: Experimental and Theoretical Contributions, from Psychological Research , 1980 .

[13]  A. A. Benton,et al.  Productivity, distributive justice, and bargaining among children. , 1971 .

[14]  M. Lerner.  The Justice Motive in Social Behavior: Introduction , 1975 .

[15]  A. Kahn.  Reactions to generosity or stinginess from an intelligent or stupid work partner: A test of equity theory in a direct exchange relationship. , 1972 .