Global rules for translating land-use change (LUH2) to land-cover change for CMIP6 using GLM2

Abstract. Anthropogenic land-use and land-cover change activities play a critical role in Earth system dynamics through significant alterations to biogeophysical and biogeochemical properties at local to global scales. To quantify the magnitude of these impacts, climate models need consistent land-cover change time series at a global scale, based on land-use information from observations or dedicated land-use change models. However, a specific land-use change cannot be unambiguously mapped to a specific land-cover change. Here, nine translation rules are evaluated based on assumptions about the way land-use change could potentially impact land cover. Utilizing the Global Land-use Model 2 (GLM2), the model underlying the latest Land-Use Harmonization dataset (LUH2), the land-cover dynamics resulting from land-use change were simulated based on multiple alternative translation rules from 850 to 2015 globally. For each rule, the resulting forest cover, carbon density and carbon emissions were compared with independent estimates from remote sensing observations, U.N. Food and Agricultural Organization reports, and other studies. The translation rule previously suggested by the authors of the HYDE 3.2 dataset, that underlies LUH2, is consistent with the results of our examinations at global, country and grid scales. This rule recommends that for CMIP6 simulations, models should (1) completely clear vegetation in land-use changes from primary and secondary land (including both forested and non-forested) to cropland, urban land and managed pasture; (2) completely clear vegetation in land-use changes from primary forest and/or secondary forest to rangeland; (3) keep vegetation in land-use changes from primary non-forest and/or secondary non-forest to rangeland. Our analysis shows that this rule is one of three (out of nine) rules that produce comparable estimates of forest cover, vegetation carbon and emissions to independent estimates and also mitigate the anomalously high carbon emissions from land-use change observed in previous studies in the 1950s. According to the three translation rules, contemporary global forest area is estimated to be 37.42×106  km 2 , within the range derived from remote sensing products. Likewise, the estimated carbon stock is in close agreement with reference biomass datasets, particularly over regions with more than 50 % forest cover.

[1]  Fortunat Joos,et al.  Sensitivity of Holocene atmospheric CO 2 and the modern carbon budget to early human land use: analyses with a process-based model , 2010 .

[2]  G. Meehl,et al.  The Importance of Land-Cover Change in Simulating Future Climates , 2005, Science.

[3]  J. Kaplan,et al.  The prehistoric and preindustrial deforestation of Europe , 2009 .

[4]  N. Ramankutty,et al.  Estimating historical changes in global land cover: Croplands from 1700 to 1992 , 1999 .

[5]  George C. Hurtt,et al.  Carbon cycling under 300 years of land use change: Importance of the secondary vegetation sink , 2009 .

[6]  Andrei P. Sokolov,et al.  Climate Dynamics (2006) DOI 10.1007/s00382-005-0092-6 , 2005 .

[7]  Limin Yang,et al.  Development of a global land cover characteristics database and IGBP DISCover from 1 km AVHRR data , 2000 .

[8]  Peter S. Curtis,et al.  Harvest impacts on soil carbon storage in temperate forests , 2010 .

[9]  M. Claussen,et al.  Contribution of anthropogenic land cover change emissions to pre-industrial atmospheric CO2 , 2010 .

[10]  H. Haberl,et al.  Unexpectedly large impact of forest management and grazing on global vegetation biomass , 2017, Nature.

[11]  J. Townshend,et al.  A new global 1‐km dataset of percentage tree cover derived from remote sensing , 2000 .

[12]  George C. Hurtt,et al.  The Land Use Model Intercomparison Project (LUMIP) contribution to CMIP6:rationale and experimental design , 2016 .

[13]  Richard Fuchs,et al.  Models meet data: Challenges and opportunities in implementing land management in Earth system models , 2017, Global change biology.

[14]  R. Houghton Revised estimates of the annual net flux of carbon to the atmosphere from changes in land use and land management 1850 – 2000 , 2003 .

[15]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Global Carbon Budget 2019 , 2019, Earth System Science Data.

[16]  Mireille Huc,et al.  GEOLOCATION ASSESSMENT OF 300 M RESOLUTION MERIS GLOBCOVER ORTHO- RECTIFIED PRODUCTS , 2008 .

[17]  J. Townshend,et al.  Carbon emissions from tropical deforestation and regrowth based on satellite observations for the 1980s and 1990s , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  C. Justice,et al.  High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change , 2013, Science.

[19]  E. Stehfest,et al.  Harmonization of land-use scenarios for the period 1500–2100: 600 years of global gridded annual land-use transitions, wood harvest, and resulting secondary lands , 2011 .

[20]  G. Bonan Forests and Climate Change: Forcings, Feedbacks, and the Climate Benefits of Forests , 2008, Science.

[21]  R. Gifford,et al.  Soil carbon stocks and land use change: a meta analysis , 2002 .

[22]  Thomas Raddatz,et al.  A reconstruction of global agricultural areas and land cover for the last millennium , 2008 .

[23]  A. Belward,et al.  GLC2000: a new approach to global land cover mapping from Earth observation data , 2005 .

[24]  Richard A. Houghton,et al.  Global and regional fluxes of carbon from land use and land cover change 1850–2015 , 2017 .

[25]  Maurizio Santoro,et al.  Compilation and Validation of SAR and Optical Data Products for a Complete and Global Map of Inland/Ocean Water Tailored to the Climate Modeling Community , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[26]  Victor Brovkin,et al.  Biogeophysical versus biogeochemical feedbacks of large‐scale land cover change , 2001 .

[27]  Chengquan Huang,et al.  Integrating global land cover products for improved forest cover characterization: an application in North America , 2014, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[28]  Thomas Raddatz,et al.  Biogeophysical versus biogeochemical climate response to historical anthropogenic land cover change , 2010 .

[29]  Pierre Friedlingstein,et al.  Twenty-First-Century Compatible CO2 Emissions and Airborne Fraction Simulated by CMIP5 Earth System Models under Four Representative Concentration Pathways , 2013, Journal of Climate.

[30]  Erkki Tomppo,et al.  A report to the food and agriculture organization of the united nations (FAO) in support of sampling study for National Forestry Resources Monitoring and Assessment (NAFORMA) in Tanzania , 2010 .

[31]  S. Pacala,et al.  Projecting the future of the U.S. carbon sink , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  R. Houghton The annual net flux of carbon to the atmosphere from changes in land use 1850–1990* , 1999 .

[33]  R. Houghton,et al.  How well do we know the flux of CO2 from land-use change? , 2010 .

[34]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ dynamic global vegetation model , 2003 .

[35]  Holly K. Gibbs,et al.  New IPCC Tier-1 Global Biomass Carbon Map for the Year 2000 , 2008 .

[36]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Global Carbon Budget 2018 , 2014, Earth System Science Data.

[37]  W. Salas,et al.  Benchmark map of forest carbon stocks in tropical regions across three continents , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  Michael T. Coe,et al.  Testing the performance of a dynamic global ecosystem model: Water balance, carbon balance, and vegetation structure , 2000 .

[39]  S. Malyshev,et al.  The underpinnings of land‐use history: three centuries of global gridded land‐use transitions, wood‐harvest activity, and resulting secondary lands , 2006 .

[40]  John E. Thornes “Urban meteorology and air quality”. Meeting 21st March 2001, University of Birmingham , 2001 .

[41]  M. Claussen,et al.  Effects of anthropogenic land cover change on the carbon cycle of the last millennium , 2009 .

[42]  S. Goetz,et al.  Estimated carbon dioxide emissions from tropical deforestation improved by carbon-density maps , 2012 .

[43]  M. Torn,et al.  Ecological limits to terrestrial biological carbon dioxide removal , 2013, Climatic Change.

[44]  Tomoko Hasegawa,et al.  Harmonization of Global Land-Use Change and Management for the Period 850–2100 (LUH2) for CMIP6 , 2020 .

[45]  Damien Sulla-Menashe,et al.  MODIS Collection 5 global land cover: Algorithm refinements and characterization of new datasets , 2010 .

[46]  Scott J. Goetz,et al.  The Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation: High-resolution laser ranging of the Earth’s forests and topography , 2020, Science of Remote Sensing.

[47]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  The Structure, Distribution, and Biomass of the World's Forests , 2013 .

[48]  Chengquan Huang,et al.  Conservation policy and the measurement of forests , 2016 .

[49]  W. M. Post,et al.  Soil carbon sequestration and land‐use change: processes and potential , 2000 .

[50]  E. Stehfest,et al.  Anthropogenic land use estimates for the Holocene – HYDE 3.2 , 2016 .

[51]  S. Malyshev,et al.  The underpinnings of land‐use history: three centuries of global gridded land‐use transitions, wood‐harvest activity, and resulting secondary lands , 2006 .

[52]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Carbon emissions from land use and land-cover change , 2012 .

[53]  R. Houghton,et al.  Terminology as a key uncertainty in net land use and land cover change carbon flux estimates , 2014 .

[54]  A. Belward,et al.  GLC 2000 : a new approach to global land cover mapping from Earth observation data , 2005 .

[55]  R. Dewar,et al.  Analytical model of carbon storage in the trees, soils, and wood products of managed forests. , 1991, Tree physiology.

[56]  Elena Shevliakova,et al.  Historical warming reduced due to enhanced land carbon uptake , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[57]  E. Hansis,et al.  Relevance of methodological choices for accounting of land use change carbon fluxes , 2015 .